Anonymous's picture
Anonymous
  • 0
40897

+ 42 Mass Spec: Balkan Test E 250 from Ashop

ad

Big thanks to HailRazor for making this possible

Balkan Test E 250

Lot #: 009

Actual content: 162.9mg/ml

Ordered from: 
swoldier's picture

A shop looks like such a jackass in this thread. Bro nobody is creating "fake" labs. You're the #1 source cuz u give out a fuckload of free gear. NOT because your products are good. You call these guys names and claim they have fake tests, then YOU post the fakest, most out of date labs of them all. Don't take everything so damn personally, we as eroids users just want clean, accurately dosed gear. If you gear isn't accurately dosed maybe you should do something about that instead of claiming that well reputable member are trying to slander you. I trust HailRazor WAYYY more than I would ever trust you. I'm sure everyone else here agrees.

Owes a Review × 2 In a promo × 2
MONK's picture

This is turning into a mirror image of the Angus days!!' you all seem to have forgot pretty damn quickly.

How about we go about this with an air of caution instead of bull in China shop mentality!!

The guys with the knowledge, have it out in a respectful debate between minds. Clueless shitbags throwing there .2cents into it from a distance, stay out of it !!

Owes a Review × 1 In a promo × 1
ashop's picture

Yes for me is fantastic how people do not see exact that here is running the exact same Angus game.

Would be good if they will concentrate on giving answers on those issues professor found on their analyzes ( those are not all but he is waiting their reply and then he will have more )

Those are analyzes done with a single injection without respecting minimum rules for a analyze. He said a real analyst would never do this no matter what so probably they are students who does not know analytic but they are doing this and who know maybe they are convinced that their methods are good. Those are simple injections maybe a demo but not a analyze.

Yes I was wrong calling them fools or crooks and I ask excuses but I know I sell good products and is wrong but very wrong to come with bad labs and do a smear campaign against a source. I cam follow rules i can comply rules but I can not fight in dirty fights.

Absolutely everyone who ever tried my products know I have the best out there. Thats the reason they want to kill me because if I was bad nobody would care.

I get tons of messages from customers who tell me not to reply to this thread and ignore but here is like someone would say my daughter is a whore in public but I dont even have a daughter. Thats exactly this situation.

Mods please ask the original posters to answer issues my professor found on their labs so we can have a good debate and clear things AGAIN. I already proved once you can not analyze steroids * drugs*without a method.

MONK's picture

Theres clearly questions to be woked out from both parties but this gets fogged by a bunch of guys slinging comments which helps noone. People forget we are all in this together. Ultimately We all want methods of ansylisis we can use directly if possible or atleast fully rely on and refrence.

Owes a Review × 1 In a promo × 1
ashop's picture

Thank you so much. That is perfectly true..

Pale's picture

Maybe you missed my memo? You make a lot of bold claims in your post. Have you ran balkan gear yourself?

swoldier's picture

I have indeed. Seemed fine to me at the time but it was awhile ago and I was a lot less educated on the subject than I am currently..

Owes a Review × 2 In a promo × 2
ashop's picture

So you tested our products and you were happy but now a fake lab done by quite new members educated you ? Quite sad if you can not stay and watch this till the end. It will be same like with Angus. Those guys with their analyze messed the oil and broke the oil into fatty acid ( probe destroyed )and they considered those impurities. Lack of minimum knowledge as analyst. Those guys are not analysts they are some students that do a injection in a MS without knowing full process.

MONK's picture

PM sent.

Owes a Review × 1 In a promo × 1
ash48's picture

Glad mods are keeping a eye on this...

A lot of unnecessary comments, let's just see what happens with the party's involved...

All the insults are pointless...

Owes a Review × 1
ashop's picture

I am here for 15 years and I have survived numerous pervert atacks. Please mind your problems and leave me manage my business how I know.
I manage my posts also after volume of support emails . Just try to leave us 3 to clear up.

I never said I have high diplomacy skills but I am 100% honest. I will say exactly what I think and I have not skills to lie you but I do what I know very honest and nothing behind customers back.

For moment my professor found lots of problems in those labs done by Jellotrip and HailRazor and they are not answering those issues. All they can do is to complain I called them fools and crooks ? OK sorry for that. Now please explain why your labs are bad, why you have not published methodology and why you only complain about some stupid words...sorry for them...

ashop's picture

So you poped out after Angus went down ? Quite strange. Anyway your skills are far worse than Angus he was able to give some answers.

Now you appeared not long time ago here gathered some Karma and you attack me that I was here for 15 years and I was never caught with lies ?

Is not that strange two guys who have no hidden agenda pop out gather karma and then goes to atack with some labs that are very wrong done ?

Can you ask your lab analyst to come with answers ? If not then ask excuses please

ashop's picture

For those who are curios please check here how similar is Jellotrip and HailRazor with Angus and his testing methods. The same way of forging answers analyzes same kind of replies

https://www.eroids.com/pics/estimation-of-steroids-concentration-by-mass...

https://www.eroids.com/pics/steriod-purity-assesment-by-electrospray-ion...

Here is a old post by me where I published methodology internationally accepted for testing steroids

https://www.eroids.com/pics/methods-of-testing-steroids-internationally-...

hermes's picture

are you saying these are the same people as the last battle? That they are fake angus accounts? I thought hail was around long before that. I'm just trying to figure out what you're suggesting.

Pale's picture

Well friend, maybe you should introduce yourself to everyone.

hermes's picture

Brother, I'm a very long time lurker and a short time poster. My fascination and passion rest in all those little molecules and how they interact within the body. The reality is that 169mg/ml is really good for a ugl. I Have nothing against the source except he called me names (herpes) on my first post. Kinda makes a guy wanna keep lurking. Not exactly a welcoming wagon. The #1 source ridiculing new guys would be something I thought mods would frown on. But apparently it's not that big of deal. So I just ask a question or two here and there, I don't see the problem???? Do I have to have a fancy number and tag next to my name to get some respect? I'm just truly interested in this conversation. Is that bad? If so say the word and I'll go back to lurking. But to answer your question........hello, my name is Hermes and I'm an OCD alcoholic and part time chemist.

Pale's picture

Wrong answer.I usually do not give second chances when I am lied to but I am feeling generous this morning.. I ask you again, who are you? Lets not go for three.

finafan's picture

I do not think he is saying that. He said that the difference between these guys and Angus was that Angus had more knowledge. That tells me he does not think it is a Angus Shill.

hermes's picture

Oh I see. I was confused. I went back and read all those posts and it was a pretty intense exchange. Much like it is now. But in the end I didn't see where it was resolved. Just seemed like a big argument.

finafan's picture

Exactly. I would like to see the end. Without blind testing I do not believe we will ever know. There really is only 2 things we need tested. Purity of raws and dosage of finished product.

HailRazor's picture

LC/MS/MS - 7329ng/dl
https://www.eroids.com/sites/default/files/gearpic/9256/MP%20LAB.jpg

LC/MS/MS - 32.64mg/mL
MS/HPLC - 37.8mg/mL

https://www.eroids.com/sites/default/files/gearpic/21800/image_60.jpg

If the lab analysis isn't accurate then we need to stop doing blood work also. I guess LabCorp is doing fake labs....my US lab is fake...and the Swiss Lab that you mentioned is fake....these are all three

ashop's picture

If your lab is good why you ( them) do not comment on all problems professor found on your analyze ?

HailRazor's picture

One of the Assay Reports on the Primo was done at the Swiss Lab that you approve of. I use multiple labs. I'm just wanting you to understand that these samples are sent off and the testing is paid for AShop. We have no control of the outcome and the Assay Results are what is emailed to us. No photoshop. We don't get the full descriptive assay report like you posted for the Balkan Test E ampules or whatever was tested. We don't get the testing lab scientist on 24 hour call so we can relay their testing methods to you. That's it....nothing more. Let's be friends buddy

ashop's picture

so you are not able to stand behind your analyzes problems found and you want us just to believe you..that analyze you posted is bad, from sample preparation to the end is all wrong. If you can not explain problems found then your analyze can not be trusted

Pale's picture

You make a good point. If these are just regular members sending in samples we are limited on several fronts what we can do. We have to be discreet due to our draconian laws, we have no control over how samples are handled and we have no control over what is sent back as far as data. Probably even more that I am too tired to remember.

With that said tho if we are going to do damage to a source with bad results we need to find a way to optimize the accuracy and truthfulness of tests. Unfortunately I do not have the answers for that problem.

HailRazor's picture

Testing MDMA tablets is by far easier than AAS. It's actually helped that community by educating them on what's pure and what can kill em. AAS samples used to be accepted by many labs. But.......

As for damaging this source....well....him calling me retarded....and having a cousin that was mongoloid and died at age ten.....well.....I won't be jumping on any of his Promos. :(

ashop's picture

So you are testing hard drugs ? aha

Pale's picture

Yea, I don't agree with the name calling either but you guys are grown men, I can only do so much. Maybe he doesn't appreciate how offensive that word has become in our culture? I have a friend with a son that has downs... I have tried to erase that word from my vocabulary.

ashop's picture

yes i overreacted but you must understand I am honest and when someone come with bad analyzes zi see red. MY EXCUSES to HailRazor and Jellotrip please now lets try to clear up your analyzes errors. I think also a source should be protected for such analyzes . If someone post then post lab also and post contacts plus receipt for it. It should be some kind of protection because I swear those labs are wrong and very wrong they have not respected minimal rules and even sample preparation is dirty

ashop's picture

so you did not run but just tested it. I think your intentions are clear. I tought you run it before

MONK's picture

You've been warned about idiotic mindless comments like that. Cool off for a few days.

Owes a Review × 1 In a promo × 1
ashop's picture

Below is the professor reply:

1.

#A question of sample preparation. Where is the proof that the solvent (toluene) was missing the found components to start with? The solvent injection is missing.#

2.

#The standards database is used for authenticity. The quantitation has to be made using the calibration mix of standards in different concentrations for the construction of the calibration curve.#

3.

#One may or may not use the intern standard. It's also called "the tagging method" and it is used when one doesn't have the possibility to strictly control the device factors. When using this method for certain calculations, one should add it to the reference and analysis samples. We may assume that these tests haven't been done because the specters and the chromatograms of the reference mix are missing.#

4.

#The testing method of single injections is not statistically reliable. One should use at least 3 determinations and calculate the RSD.#

5.

#Three of the substances found in the sample ? Tricaprilin (mixture of glycerin an caprylic acid), tricaprin (glycerol tricaprate), decanoic acid (capric acid) are oil components. The other 2 substances are some sort of derivatives of the decanoic acid. The standards database shows an 80% coincidence for one of them, while the other one is not shown at all. Anyhow, they are not steroid substances that would show impurities of testosterone.#

6.

#It's hard to find a logic in the shown results. We have been shown only the initial components and the final components.#

7.

#We return to the same discussion we had before. The method of MSGC may be applied for product dosage but only if used correctly.#

ashop's picture

ask your chemists please and come with pertinent answers. You started with a fake lab and when I brought you evidences you are at the level of calling names or false accusations. So please come with answers from your chemists and defend your labs. Lets start serious and lets speak on the subject

ashop's picture

Now I got the email from professor i will type and post. Shortly was not used any standard substance there is only one injection and they make confusions of the excipients of impurities ( no ideea what impurities are )

finafan's picture

Until this method is proven correct there is not much reason to trust it. Ashop needs to realize that these members are not attacking him and making up lab reports. These labs are being paid for to try to help them and the community. Ashop does have a right to be pissed if the test is wrong. Think of the money it could cost him. If he is correct then he is the one getting scammed. I am not a A shop fan but I am for finding the truth. With out that A shop seems to have upper hand.