posted Mon, 06/16/2014 - 17:49
1808
Is a CC the solution or the product inside?
ad
Ok, I know this is going to get some nasty responses but I still will put it out there. Please be gentle.
If someone is referring to taking 1CC of Test a week and they are using Test with 100MG/1CC, does that mean they are taking 10CC of the solution a week to obtain the 1CC of Test? I know it seems a very obvious and dumb question but when I read of people taking 2-3CC's a week of Test (plus whatever else they are taking), the amount, volume and cost involved with the injections sort of don't seem realistic.
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
well to be honest I remember my first go at trying to figure out what everything meant! shit confused the fuck out me, not to mention all the god damn names sources use on bottles, plus one steroid gots 2-3 names plus some generic names and then theres the BB lingo. I think I spent half the day trying to figure out dex, caber and prami, and that was after i found out what source to find it with! LOL...its not a dumb question shit is confusing.
however this is the kind of question a child writes, and he asks it the way you did, so he can understand what people are saying in posts, but what he really means is he is trying to understand how to run his cycle. After years of doing this, posts like this stick out like a sore thumb and of course are gonna get you a lot of smart ass remarks.
Ok, forget I ever asked the question and a sarcastic thank you to those that are too full of their self-importance to think that any negative response means that a person is young or being childish. And what if a person is young anyway (which I'm clearly not)? Don't they have a right to a courteous and quality response to their questions?
In response to Crazymofo, the reason I posted the question was the purposes of research and clarification, isn't that the point?
Responses received have been overall trolling rubbish, insulting or asking for information that has no importance to what was asked. Maybe crack down on those that just write something humerous for the sake of hopefully getting a status point rather than hassle those with a genuine question....even if the question was not ideally worded.
I will continue to use this forum for the very good information that can be found but will no longer bother asking questions when anyone with less than a decade of experience with gear is considered a neophyte and treated with little respect.
As the common phrase goes 'I'm too old for this shit'.
Negative BS..... if thats the case i should go out to pasture!.......... Age card means fk all as long as i roam this board.
RustyhookerThen it's obviously clear that you're simply a hazard to yourself while you wallow in your blind arrogance. And in this game, you'll be the first to fall.
Just fantastic!
Dang, I like to write shit like that. It is rather good !
RustyhookerFirst cup of coffee gave me some spark. Lol!
Hi all. Thanks for your useful...and not so useful...comments. My question was apparently very stupid and badly worded from the responses but only sought for clarification. I have not posted stats, goals or prior cycles as there is no relevance to the question posed. My question was answered between Champion of the Mind and Iron Game.
RustyhookerThere's plenty relevance! Its a general rule to NOT just bust out info. One question leads to another then lil Timmy 16 is off and hitting roids in high school.
There's no stupid question. But there can be stupid answers. Answers that cause harm or half cocked notions.
The question was related specifically to how a dosage is determined, not how to apply to a cycle and my goals. With respect to your Exp level and not trying to start an argument but if I responded with matters that were not specific to my question, I would have received irrelevant responses. A specific response is going to be far more beneficial and probably cause less harm than a convoluted answer.
Asking for stats and priors is just standard protocol around here. It is to help make sure bad advice is not given. And to also help prevent someone who is too inexperienced from doing something too advanced, which could potentially be dangerous. Take your question for example. It is a red flag that you have not done your research. It is a basic dosing question. Then add the fact you are responding childishly is another red flag that you might be young.
Edited grammar error.
Stats
Age: 48
Height: 6'3"
Weight: 215
BF:
Boom that took 3 secs to copy and paste.......... :/
Now how about some BF% and some priors?
RustyhookerLike bookwork! +2 perfect response
RustyhookerStill no stats priors or goals...YET....answers posted?
Dudes like 15....
I would love to see the breakdown of your last cycle.
You're hurting my brain..
A cc is a unit of measurement by volume. Its the equivalent of 1ml. A standard vial is 10ml, which is also 10cc. Its just 2 ways of saying the same thing.
So test 250 means 250mg per ml.
It also means 250mg per cc. Because a cc and a ml are the same thing. This what you're aiming for?
I took care of it bro.. read through my comments... I don't think he know what he was asking originally LMAO
Lol. Shit I have no clue either Haha
Best answer then is NO DON'T DO IT LMAO
Test usually comes in 250mg/ml unless it's test-p which is usually around 100mg/ml. If the guy is taking 1cc of test then he is running 250mgs of test weekly, unless ofcourse it is test-p which would only equal out to 100mg... running 100mgs of test weekly isn't that much.. if his running 1cc of test-p weekly it's not doing much if not anything productive. there's too many variables here to put a period on what you're saying.. we need some more information... like what kinda test.. i'm assuming test-p... how many injections... which days are you pinning etc.. give me something to work with bro.
The question is around the reference being used by people. I have always assumed that dosages refers to the active part and not the oil but wanted to make sure I was correct. I'm just running a cruise dose at present until next cycle
I made a post that indicates the true dose per 100mgs of all common hormones..
http://www.eroids.com/forum/steroids-qa/anabolic-steroids/the-true-drip....
IDK if people are factoring that information in.. I am.. but thats me.. usually and majority of the time they are referring to the hormone and its ester collectively in that single cc.
That's gold. Thanks!
Ha ha, sorry guys. I will try again. The example is a Test solution of 100MG per 1ML (1CC). If someone is talking about taking 1CC of Test a week, in this instance are they taking 10CC (10 x 100MG) or just 1CC (100MG)?
Is that better or exactly the same? :-)
I'm not sure if I'm understanding you correctly but a cc is just a measurement of oil/liquid. Ifs the same as a ML. So some gear might be 250mg/ml and others might be 100mg/ml. So a ml or cc means nothing regarding the actual dosage someone is using. Two people can both be taking 2cc a week but one persons on 500mg a week and the other is on 250 because the mg per cc is higher
Yeah, that's where I'm coming from. Thanks!
Mr KfizzleThis confuses me! Don't confuse me lol you're overthinking this shit! Start back at the beginning man.
RustyhookerWhats your stats? Priors? Goals?
1cc is the same as 1 mL
If your taking 1cc of test a week (which is pointless) at 100mg then you only use 1cc a week
Wtf u talkin bout Willis..that made no sense
Yeah I tried to edit it but you replied..lol....brain fart