posted Fri, 10/17/2025 - 20:33
962
Why do no sources sell Increlex?
ad
An old source on here used to sell it and it was honestly fucking amazing IYKYK (idk if mentioning old sources is against the rules or I would). It was pure IGF-1
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
Bro there used to be a source one here gimpjuices.net he'd sell insubolic the only igf I've ever taken that would keep me full all day and an amazing pump I believe my was true igf.
He was a reseller of Qtropin and insubolic
@Greg fix it to where he ain't a source on your forum anymore another option you could also go with is put him as inactive... just a few suggestions!
Keep up the good work!
Or you can follow the rules or go elsewhere.
What rule wasn't followed?
If you read the rules you'll know.
A link to the rules is in the footer of the page. (Very bottom). What was censored is also a big clue.
My bad he mentioned who used to have a certain product I reminded him of it just needed clarification on it. Didn't mean it as a suggestion .
Legit I had a perma pump from that shit
That’s the one!!!
I figured that's who you were taking about! Shit was amazing!
I’d literally be so hyped to hit arms with that shit lol
I know bro... I pinned literally every muscle that i trained for that day. Calves were a fun one to They would even get tighter than my biceps!
Can it please come back
That’s funny, I was just talking with key about it this morning. He used to have it made but stopped at some point. I didn’t get an answer as to why, or why labs don’t make it. On paper LR3 and DES are significantly more potent than increlex. Yet we always hear increlex is superior. The difference seems to lie in dosing. The manufacturer of increlex recommends around .12mg/kg twice a day. So if you’re 100kg that’s 12mg twice a day. Or Patrick Tuor recommendation of 2-7mg Ed. Yet with LR3 and DES we pussy foot around With 100-200mcg Ed dosing. I suspect if someone ran 2-7mg Ed or quality LR3 or DES they’d have similar results to increlex. Except that would cost a fortune lol. .
Exactly, the og insubolic (increlex) was affordable and really worked all for me. I really haven’t dabbled ever in Lr3 or DES, I’ve been patiently waiting to see increlex come back lol
That’s a really solid point, Iron … and one that’s been bugging me for a while too.
I’ve always wondered what the true advantage is of running IGF-1 LR3 or DES alongside GH compared to Increlex with GH. Since GH will already convert downstream to IGF-1 (even if in smaller, less “controlled” amounts), is there really a distinct edge … or are we just chasing different delivery kinetics?
Also, don’t you think pushing IGF-1 that high (like Increlex doses or multi-mg LR3/DES) would stall things pretty fast? I’ve heard a lot of credible coaches claim you start desensitizing or down-regulating receptors after just 3–4 weeks, so shorter runs with long breaks make more sense.
Then you’ve got guys like Palumbo saying “the less you use, the better,” recommending 25 mcg/day … which sounds ultra-conservative compared to what the pros actually used back in the day. The discrepancy between what’s said and what’s done is pretty wild.
It just seems like there’s still a huge gray area when it comes to the balance between effective dosing and adaptive resistance. What’s your take, brother? Have you ever seen real-world cases where higher IGF dosing clearly outperformed GH alone in body comp or muscle density?
There definitely seems to be a significant advantage running increlex with GH vs just GH alone when it comes to muscle growth. The mechanism for muscle growth on increlex is pretty unclear to me. Is it just because it elevates IGF-1 levels way beyond what GH could ever do? I can’t imagine it raises it that much higher than GH at the doses used. For use in kids the goal is to get them to normal IGF-1 levels. A 4 year old weighing 40lbs/18kg would take a dose similar to a BB, 3-5mg Ed. The high end of normal for serum IGF-1 at 4 is about 240. So 3-5mg Ed presumably would only raise their IGF-1 levels to 240. Possibly less if doctors want them more towards the middle of the range and not the absolute top. those IGF levels are well within the capabilities of GH for most people. How high could igf-1 levels really be on 2-5mg ed for someone who’s 100kg? Max a 240 point increase which is not that crazy? GH seems to have other anabolic pathways beyond IGF-1. Increlex doesn’t, but it still seems to be more potent than GH when it comes to muscle growth. So idk how that makes sense. I’ve had high IGF-1 levels like that on GH and never seen dramatic results in terms of muscle growth like people’s do on increlex.
I don’t know anyone who’s ran high does LR3. Everyone just sticks with the 25-100mcg Ed dosing recommendations. But I do know of some people who have ran increlex at a couple mg ED and got dramatic results. So is the difference because Increlex is magic, or because the dose is 10-20x higher? Idk.
Now would a higher dose cause faster receptor down regulation? It doesn’t seem to on Increlex when ran at up to 7mg ed. Idk if LR3 differs in that regard. I would think it’s more of a prolonged expose type of thing that causes it, not like a cumulative amount hitting the receptors which would happen in days on 1mg ed of LR3 vs a month on 100mcg ed. But I could be totally wrong about that.
I feel like it would definitely out perform in muscle growth but gh would be most ideal for recomp. I could be wrong.
Gimps R Us sells it. Large pack around a comma.
What
lol forgot we can’t post sources like that Greg was nice enough to edit it for me.
Whats the point when you can just buy IGF-1, Like what advantage would increlex have instead of just using IGF-1? I am just asking because I am trying to gain my knowledge as I don't know a whole lot about increlex.
Increlex IS IGF1 (man made), DES and LR3 are modified