Makwa's picture
Makwa
  • 5.6k
  • CC
  • PRO
3334

+ 2 Bold cyp VS EQ comparison

ad

I am seeing more and more people running bold cyp cycles. I am really considering running it for my next bulk cycle. It would be nice to get some feedback from people who have ran both bold cyp and EQ cycles. What I am really interested in is:

  1. Are you able to run them pretty much the same mg for mg and get similar results or are you able to run say bold cyp at 500mg and get equivalent results to say running 700mg of EQ? There would technically be more boldenone in the cyp so I am wondering if you can run slightly lower doses than what you would for an EQ cycle.

  2. Are the results comparable? Did your 12-14 wk bold cyp cycle give you similar lbm gains and vascularity to say a 16-20 wk EQ cycle? I am thinking the longer cycle may have better retainable gains since the gains may be slower overall thus allowing the body to adjust to them better and making them easier to keep.

  3. Did you experience the massive jumps in RBC etc with the bold cyp? Or is the cycle over and done with right away so it really doesn't become an issue. Now that I am getting older this is becoming more of a concern to me. EQ is the only thing that has ever caused me to have elevated BP during a cycle. Did you still have to donate blood during the bold cyp cycle?

  4. Was the insatiable appetite there with the bold cyp? I really didin't experience it during my EQ cycle but I am wondering with a faster acting cyp if this comes on stronger and is more intense or not?

I am sure I'll have more questions, but hopefully with more and more people running both now, some of these can be answered.

gorillafit28's picture

I've got a pretty good background w the cyp version! Honestly there does seem to be a bit of a difference! Obviously one being noticing the water kick in a little faster but the main thing I noticed was far more vascularity and a little less hunger and w the bold ace this becomes even more apparent! O and one other thing my bold cyp seems to almost always crash twards the end of my big jugs I get of it I've never had a issue w eq doing this

Athlete126's picture

I have a ton of experience with regular EQ and after using bold cyp I will never go back. Bold cyp definitely got me the fuller, vascular look alot quicker than regular eq. I didn't feel a difference in pip which wasnt existent but I like the fact bold cyp is in quicker. I never get the increased appetite with either. My RBC was very high with both as well :/

Dacky's picture

I'm very interested in these questions too. As you know I am planning an EQ/Test run but I am keen to understand what can be achieved using Bold Cyp relative to EQ. 12/14 weeks seems so much more sensible than 20. This is besides the point that Bold Cyp is proving difficult to source domestic to the UK or Europe.

lonewolf1's picture

Hit Rusty up he is the eq/bold Cyp guy pretty certain he has ran both . Wished I could help u here but never ran either.

propkick2's picture

I only have experience with EQ. Ive heard that Bold Cyp can have a hell of a bite