Yeah his point is well shared I think by many and I share it to "some" degree.. as someone who uses a lot of prop in B&C I have been able to figure something out that others who may only use it in short cycles or kicks and tapers may or may not have figured out. Ok so what I do is usually take my bp daily. Bp is a really cool way to manage your experience with test in terms of how frequently you need to pin etc but it takes a long time if you really want some science behind it for the individual. I say for the individual because we are all going to break down esters and carry test in higher levels differently based on our own body. So for myself in checking bp I notice at about 48 hrs the slightly elevated level I had i n bp drops back off. If I maintain daily injections the slight elevation stays in constant . So that is actuallly answering some questions for me. I know we can sit and do the math as to half life, life and build ratio in numbers but its still tough to debate the bp for an individual. If I go 72 hrs my bp does actually drop a bit more which means at 48 some of the test broke down in depletion based on half and then at 72 there was either further breakdown of "some" test. In the life. That means possibly even some of the ester possibly degraded faster than the majority and dropped quicker than the majority . Either way, by 48 hrs the largest depletio. As to half life had occured. I can go to the ed injection and after 24 hrs of the first pop bp slightly elevate. Continuing ed there is a slight build. And after a few days bp will slightly elevate again and then ceiling for me personally. By the end of about a week I have some degree of perfection there and all is stable, higher than normal bp but stable. Now take test E. Let the build and degredation of ester peak and a "semi"-stability comes in and you have achieved roughly wht you did. With ed prop inj. I will often have someone test to see if their prop is bunk by injecting 200 mg's of prop and watch for spike in bp after having ran 2 or 3 days of bp averages pre-use. That science does not tell us the strength of the product as to proper dosing but does answer whether or not its straight oil or product is present.
So. Long story short I agree with the 700=700 argument to the degree they will both be effective cycles but you will as a longer term user see there is a difference. Not a difference necessarily that will be extremely obvious in ny way if eating properf to goal because when doing so one might even see a much smaller dose is needed given the diet is the true reason for growth and the exta gear is just allowing protein to be processed at a higher rate of efficiency.
Anyway, provided your diet is clean and you have very high water intake, running an AI and limiting salt you can actually see how well a product is maintaining the "stability" I refer to by running bp a couple times a day using both long and short ester test seperate in different cycles and watching how they effect you personally. Easy way to prove out the debate in effectiveness is with suspension. You can see with suspension the bp will change dramatically in flucuation without multiple shots in a day and if using suspension even daily you realize half life does not really apply to it given no ester and that argument of in and out can play itself over to the argument that prop in short ester is in and out as well just actually having a little "build " factor and that a longer version of ester will have a larger degree of "build" factor giving 2 different experiences even if only detectable with a l?onger term user.