+ 12 test prop and counting its value
Ok let's do this thing! I have had this conversation 1000 times and again just now in PM. I have so many people tell me "I'm running 700 mg's of test a week because I'm hitting 100 mg's a day of prop". Or.."I'm running a gram plus a week of test since I'm hitting 150 ed split suspension". My reply is "No , you're not".
So let me ask, do you count the steak you ate Monday on your Friday caloric intake? Of course not, so why would you count prop you hit on Monday in Fridays test total for the week? Hell if we're counting test that we know is gone let's just count the whole fing yr's test in this weeks, right?
Give me your argument on this, either I don't get it or I can't explain it well enough to make others understand ( some do get it btw but others don't or I don't). Here's my argument, test prop falls off a cliff in free test blood plasma levels in 48 hrs. So let's go from half life to life and give it 72 hrs to be nice to it. So if I'm hitting 100 mg's ed the very most I can combine count the way we do long ester that is growing every damn week is 300. That's it that's max that's the most test you will have in your system impacting plasma levels in test ever at any one time....PERIOD.
Again, I'm not counting Mondays frito pie in Fridays cals because it is gone, its not even in my house anymore unless I forgot to flush and its sure as hell not in my body!
If you hit 700 mg's of test E split weekly the ester does not drop as quick as the pins go in your ass so you are actually growing the test count weekly having a higher impact on your free test blood plasma levels until the drop reaches the increase and then you maintain an average much higher than the max of 300 you might have in the 100 ed scenario with prop.
What say you? Agree/disagree/different perspective
(This has been a public service announcment and the views and opinions expressed may or may not reflect that of the host, rebate not available on 2011 closeouts, member FDIC)
- Bookmark
- 12
- 0
cdaddy7That gives me hope and I'm goin to have to put it to the test bc I have gotten to where my body loves some good prop and responds extremely well to it....I had a convo with u on PIP a month or so ago and i remember u sayin that the PIP was non existent....I'm about to start a new cycle and prop is on the agenda and I am going to run it on thru to see if mayb I can adapt as u have Master T....lots of changes in Cdaddy's thinkn bc of u and more to come as I have pm u on already
Dude this is one of those cases when you have to just go with the flow and say fuck science. And I'm all about science. Running 1g test prop is nothing like running 1g cyp, unless it's Watson ;) I couldn't even handle 750 of that shit. As far as long vs short esters, unless I'm prepping for a show you won't catch me pinning anything but peps and other things Ed. E3d is my max offseason, I like the break.
Instructional purposes only!
tread-mLmaaaoooo...BOOM!
Good post brother, this has me thinking a little and that is a good thing given the fact that my mind isn't very good at that.
Lets turn this around a bit and count the value of a longer ester like Test E.
Assuming that E has a half life of 7 days and we inject 1400 mg once a week. (Just an example ladies don't bust my balls for this cycle.) Technically the testosterone would deplete 100 mg per day thus feeding your receptors 100 mg/day, is that correct? One couldn't assume that day one your receptors are being fed 1400 mg/day day two your receptors are being fed 1300 mg/day, day three your receptors are being fed 1200 mg/day and so on can they?
tread-mThats the general idea you can find an actual chart for this on the net. Point being in a long ester for a period of time levels actually build which means you count the weeks test and then some . With prop after looking at the half life in a short time you have achieve perfection in levels. They essentially are falling off almost as fast as going in so we don't add the weeks mg's persay. Lets use 100 ed for the sample and say we want to have the wrporth of 700 by weeks end in our system. We can't expect that simly because the "worth" of Mondays shot is no longer with us on Friday. In that scenerio the most there would ever be in your system as to worth is 300. With the long ester building faster than depleting the worth does actually build to match a weeks mg's.
I like that knowlege brother!!! So how do you view a Sus blend for overall use verse lets say runnning a T-Prop and adding a longer ester like Test decanoate or cypionate mix? For example would you be in favor of starting with a T-Prop and a cyp/dec mix and exclude the T-Prop at desired week and maintain the longer esters or how some people run Sus for the entire weeks of cycle? I have had mixed results myself. some say the T-Prop can add a little shock due to the shorter ester and help with consistent gains, where some say bridgeit and keep level sustainable during middle to end weeks and only bridge down with a shorter ester. Just want to know what your take on it would be. Appreciate the info.
AnonThis is so freakin' confusing!!! Can this post get deleted because i cant stop reading it lol. Its kinda like looking at one of those pictures and not seeing the hidden picture, it drives me crazy. Maybe, it's hard to think about because with steroids the question is always "how many MG's should i take a week" or " I take x amount of MGs a week" and when we talk about food its daily, so it almost seems like second nature to look at it from those prespetives. I could really care less what anyone thinks im just trying to get my karma to look like yours Tread. ;)
tread-mLol...it is that picture dear! I'm glad it drove you as crazy as it does me though, I don't feel so lonely now ; )
I see my main Guru is doing what he does best, now can a nooka get a shot of that sweeeeeet propinator
tread-mBaaaaazing! Now thats wats up!
I think another interesting part of the question is also how to target the ideal ng/dL for adequate blood serum levels. If we take a normal healthy male 31yrs his serum levels may display a higher morning ng/dL by runnning 150-200mg of TP EOD than the average male 50yrs old running TP 150-200mg EOD. Now switch to a women who needs far less testosterone but is using half the method above. She may experieice same results if not better with a lower ng/dL level. So what mg's you run verse the receptor absorbtion may not be accurate to assume that the total serum mg's taking on a daily or weekly basis. But in all fariness if you are Inj any mg daily or weekly it may always have a measurement of total serum ng/dL based on the gender, age, and involvement on the total Test serum. How bogged down or surpressed the receptor sites may be is also a component. You may just be pissing away Test....lets just say if your not hitting the gym hard. not having sex, not having an emotional experience (Anger, Sexual Desire, Stress) these are all components of hormones. Thats why we notice that extremely fit people are energetic, outgoing, sexual, work out, always on the go etc.... It's all in the science of hormones. Test is just great all around period.
tread-mI'm going to rep you for the effort and for using the term "sexual desire". Its under used in my opinion because I KNOW HOW TO COUNT PROP VALUES AND DO IT RIGHT! lol
Whats up tread can you not sleep lol its not 9am yet here you should be in deep dream world.
tread-mI'm trying honey, have an Eroids annonymous meeting in the morning so expecting good things! Lol
Oooh sounds ominous lol i am just trying to source some of that melanotan seeing that our weather is rubbish.
tread-m: ( I'm sorry, shall I send some sunshine your way from the Lone Star state? Lol
pleeeeese
tread-mI'll bring it myself...send V out for some tuna or something! Lool
Will do,hes gone for a haircut this morning so the kettle is on,will camomile tea do for you sir or would you prefer peppermint lol we have no coffee in the house at the moment due to dieting its murder.
tread-mCame for the tea, stayed for the Suze ; )
Hahahahah... i wondered who had been sat in daddy bears chair lol and you left the dirty cup for me to wash too!
tread-mLMAAAOOOOO...MY BAD BROTHER, I GOT DISHES NEXT TRIP OVER ... : P
I don't know brother, let's see:
if Lil Billy takes 100mg of prop for 7 days how many mg's of prop did Lil Billy jack in one week?
100mg x 7= 700mg
Math works for me LOL!!
tread-mOk then...if lil Billy take in 2000 cals ed for 7 days
2000 cals x 7 = 14,000 cals
Math works for me too, so you start counting cals and prop by the week and I'll count both by the day as the bloods indicate should be the case ; P
You are actually the only one here that surprised me, you usually get this stuff?
Anonyour math is totally correct he sure did eat 14,000 calories that week! Wheres the issue??? Again i hate this post hahaha. Its like youre contradicting what youre saying but at the same time youre not.
I totally get it brother T!
I guess the facetiousness of my "LOL" didn't translate well =/
tread-mNo it did but then it felt as though "whaaaaaaaaaaaat" looool
Its like that picture where everyone see's the butterfly but a few can't see it unless they stare at it a really long time! Well there are a few that have been staring a really long time and still don't see it...lol
I get it, you can't count what isn't there.So the most you'll ever have in your system in one week is the long ester (test E) and the short ester that lasted the 48hrs (test p) in your total for the end of the week. if you run 500mg testE per week and 100mg test p eod then from monday-friday (on friday you will have 600mg of test for that week). Because the other injecs of tst on monday and wensday are already out of your system and therefor are no longer in effect. But the final shot you did on friday is in effect, so that combined with the other inj (mon,thurs test E250) would give you the total.Am I right tread?
tread-mOut of the mouths of babes! You complete me Nooka!
thanks brotha n great post!
AnonIm a woman so what do i know right?! but heres my thought.... you dont calculate your caloric intake for the week you calculate it daily, as to where steroids you do a weekly calculation of the different compounds you take. You really cant compare the two, but i get what your saying if you looked at it in that perspective. In my eyes if i took 50 mg's winny ed, then i did 350 mg's of winny for the week, and if i ate 30 grams of protein over 5 meals a day then i have consumed 150 grams of protein in a day. Just my 2 cents. sorry to dig this post back up but i just read it.
tread-mNo sorries, I love this topic as confusing as it seems. So I think you hit the nail on the head b ut I think you did so with your protein analogy rather than winnie. In fact especially rather than with winnie given its short half. So lets use winnie and protein since you touched on it. You said "you don't calculate caloric intake for the week". So I ask why not? Your answer of course would be "well, todays calories are gone tomorrow". So that has made my point....if todays winnie is gone tomorrow why are you still counting it a week from now? Your analogy with the protein at the bottom simply had yolu counting protein daily and winnie weekly but hthey are the same thing at the end of the day. The logic for not counting protein by the week also applies to winnie we just have not applied it mostly. I watched a study unfold by where bloods were drawn daily with prop shots every 24 hrs. The bloods showed that free test b lood plasma levels fell off a cliff at 48 hrs just like winnie would do at 24 and protein would do at 24 so it has always puzzled me why we are still counting those compounds a week later. I hope that helped L, my point is I do things for reason and not out of habit just because everyone else did it that way. There is simply no more of a reason to count winnie a week from npw unless thatg same reasoning is applied to calories. Does that make any more sese of it to you? Thanks for the reply and taking the time ; )
I wanted to make a comment here to bring it back up the top again. Alot of people should read this. I also feel it should be a sticky so it doesn't get lost pages down the list.
Cheers
Walla
well I have seen your point in all this, read it many times, logically makes sense. however I dont believe it is 100% accurate. if it where then you would reach stable blood levels in 3 days and it would never go any higher, to be honest I dont feel prop until after 6 to 8 days, and if you load it in the riod calc it doesnt stabilize until 14 days. 100mg/d prop will be fully kicked in at day (I think) 14 at 95mg/in the body everyday(that is due to the human error factor of 5%). Test-e dont kick fully till like week 7, 700mg/w will get you to 115mg/in the body at the maximum...My point is that regardless of the ester they still build and in the end I cant tell the difference from 95mg/or 115mg, so saying 700mg/w means the same to me whether its prop, e/c or what have you. I suppose it might work like that for suspension or TNE but never really seen someone say im running 700mg/w of one of those as part of a calculated cycle, but if I ever do ill send them your way!
tread-m"I don't believe its 100% accurate". I think you're right, I think maybe 80% have a "similar" experience and 20% a very different one based on many things. In my case for example, I can feel prop in under 48 hrs and it will show up in bp elevation in under 24 testing it with a 200 mg shot. My difference may be that I pull shbg in control early on and in others case they may need a week or even longer to control that value with test injections and not feel the effects nearly as quick. I see your points on "suppose it might work for TNE/susp" but you can simply chart the activity from susp to prop to E etc and draw the similar conclusion with prop. I don't necessarily trust the roid calculator in the human experience in the way I do the actual human experience in lab testing. I'll try to find the larger study I read on once upon a time and link it. In that study. Test prop began full elevation from 12 through 40+ hrs and then with continued blood tests through the duration of the test it drops in dramatic fashion at the 48 hr mark. So in the scenario you point out in math by where you achieve some stability at 72 hrs, I believe that is correct. The problem ther is the study did not determiine when the "individuals" each personally "Felt it kick" which would be very different for each individual such as is different between you and I.
I think the "feel it kick" issue is resolved by seeing where an individuals estro is, where their SHBG is and the overall total values in virtually all hormone. In an individual with very low test that realization may come much earlier than in an individual with normal or high test as well. At the same time that may be very off as well, the individual with very low test is also very likely to have very high SHBG, in which case not only is what little natty test they have being robbed, the new prop injections will be robbed as well for the period of time it takes for the new test injections and or AI to drive it down. In that scenario you might see an individual not feel the kick for even 2 weeks even though the blood tests would have shown the test elevation all the way back to day 2. Those individual factors will play huge rolls in the actual effects in est use but I can assure you , all of the individuals in the study had marked and measurable test increase at 48 hrs and likely a degree of tability at 72 even if "full" stability was not the case due to other factors.
Now we have to factor in a persons shutdown. If someone is in relatively normal state of test ratio and even if all other markers are in the normal range, someone has the serious possibilty of not "feeling the kick" until the process of negative feedback loop in the axis has occured to the time and degree necessary to deplete LH production from the pituitary. In that scenario true to varying degree in all of us other than those cruising, the scale on one side is having to drop as the opposite side is raising and that acual feeling of kick not be present until the scales have had time to change and elevation well beyond that individuals natty has occured.
So you can see, in just a couple of scenarios you can explain the difference in the "individual" and there are likely at least 100 othe variables, still not taking from the facts that the bloodwork will show in reality which is the 48 hr cliff.
Good read. The whole thread is a good read. Im goin to take my T. Prop ED...
It's called accumulative values my good man Tread. And yes you are again 100% on the money. It's the same as having a piss after drinking 1000ml of water and your bladder only contains 500ml. You still have an excess 500ml of water in your system (very basic terms) the. If you drank another 1000ml of water and pissed out another 500ml you have then pissed 1000ml and taken in 2000ml so the accumulative value of water in your system is 1000ml. 500ml more than the last drink and a full liter more than before you had the first drink. I couldn't think of an easier way too put it. If you can't understand what the big guy has said or me either google accumulative drug values and I am sure there will be a mountain of info for you to sift through.
tread-mFinally, some nice info! As Madden would say " that's the ole piss jug fleeflicker right there!"
Haven't heard that one. Piss jug fleeflecker. I can understand how newer guys struggle to take the info in and I can see where they go wrong. They are too busy looking at the whole week and the weeks worth of gear taken. But as you say if the mg have been processed it's gone. You can't count it. This is a subject that probably should have been raised a long time ago as as sticky. It's one of the golden rules of AAS use in my book.
http://www.1girl1pitcher.org/
I think this sums it up!
tread-mLol...brother you have waaay too much time on your hands! I can't believe you actually found the piss jug fleeflicker!
tread-mYou'd be surprised how many vets, mostly other boards, I've argued this with! Counting a 150 ed prop as over a gram a week...nope, not going to count Mondays protein shake either since its gone too by friday! Lol
OKAY, I HAD TO READ THAT TWICE BUT I C YOUR PROBLEM. I CANT REALY RELATE BUT ILL TELL WHY I USE PROP. test prop 100 is one of my all time fave. for some reason all i have to do is stack 100 t prop & test e 250 (and deca or whatever, or just those 2) i stack these two every 3 days, or twice in 7 days, im geneticly tone and cut with hardly no % of fat. i only usualy use prop in summer, but good for winter cause small amounts of T-prop great for sex lol, in summer because it keeps me looking like a cut up beast w/o the water. i love prop. cheap and great to stack on top of any cycle. and you can get away with 2 times a week or ,in my case, evey 3 days (1 day away from twice a week). it keeps me pumed and cut up like i just got out the gym and NO WATER! when i used to get from doc in florida, they got busted for some reason, my personal n p would tell me that mainly for comp. well i love looking comp. ready. i love the pump it gives me and for you new bros, if you cant pin twice a week or more, better stick to cyp or enanthate at high dose. pinning is nothing after a few times. i acualy look forward to the adrenaline rush from pinning. most likly all in my head. I GET MY PROP FROM GBNSTORE.COM AND USE THERE KALPA, BALKAN, AND SCIROXX. THE KALPA SEEMS TO LAST 4 DAYS.
Signature Compounding Pharmacy?
palm beach life
HA,HA...yes, lookin good is the way of life..Also, never wanting to look old..So, I heard..For legel purposes, lets just call it male rejuvenation.
tread-mSome refer to it as "fix a flat" for the standing weiner challenged.
Lol, ya I tried to use that excuse to my doc and he recommended subliqual CIALIS/TEST compounded in a troche lozenge. 5mg test and 40mg CIALIS..I had to buy it thier aswell. 15 bucks for 1..Next time Ill do Bloods and get what I want, when its time.
"it works"