+ 1 How much is too much
I just got my lab report ( http://www.eroids.com/pics/kodiak-test-e-and-tren-e-lab-results-7-weeks-... )
and the results seem pretty good.
I often see posts arguing the merits of using 1 gram, 2 grams, and less than a gram per week.
Where, instead, the conversation should be (IMO) what's the optimum blood level you should be shooting for?
I'm of the mind that less is more as long as you are seeing results. This cycle, at 900 mg per week, my free test is 1144 pg/mL and total test is 3272 pg/mL
At these levels should I:
Stay the course
Cut back and expect the same results.
Increase the dose for better results.
Mind you, I'm seeing great results as it is, personally I don't think I need or should go higher. Just wondering what others think that the "optimum level" should be or is it too user specific to think that way.
- Bookmark
- 1
- 0
Good numbers but increase the dose and see what happens...... that will be the answer YOU personally are looking for...... for others it could/would be a whole different set of figures.
Just for my own curiosity how much tren E have you got running please..... just to shed more light on the receptor battle issue that keeps cropping up.... because in this case it dosent look like your test is being wasted by tren controlling receptor sensitivity.
mjunkie got me rethinking that as well...
I'm running 500mg Test-e and 400 mg Tren-e
It's contrary to conventional wisdom but I can't argue with the numbers...
Ah... see thats why i always run near enough the same ratio test to tren.... free test always comes back really high on bloods with little to zero sides from the tren but still with all the advantages ... i have tried upping and downing the ratios in the past with significantly different readings and sides.... so for me the optimum dosage is a 40/60 test/tren split ..... others will do differently and probably do very well but we all have to find our happy mediums but!.. you and me both have now proved that tren is not dominating OUR receptor sensitivity.
It's AMAZING #, stay the course!
ALL from the top Quality Gear your using!
GATOR
Those are optimal numbers your free test is unbelievable. I wouldn't increase the questions is can these doses maintain these levels or will they start dumping into higher e2 or declining for some other biological reason. I would be interested to see the outcome. I say stay the course run bloods in another month just to see if the protocol is holding. Report back here so I can imitate it if it holds steady! Lol
AnonI think if you are keeping over a third of your test "free" then you are at an optimum place. Sounds to me like you have a nice thing going, why mess with it ?
That's an amazing free test number bro. Is there anything in your stack to account for that like proviron?
nothing but test-e and tren-e.
this is the most mg per week I've ever taken
RustyhookerIf you're feeling great then ride it. You know I'm a fan of a good low dose stack but sometimes just big n simple is just that. It's the numbers other than test to keep eyes on because you already know you can easily unbind test for a better "hit" per dose. Bp, rbc, etc. The numbers that show stress to your inner workings. If those are do-able...hydrate and go for it.
waltrI would personally side with your logic of "if i'm seeing great results with what your doing, then why change it?"
I'm not the most experienced person in the world on these kinds of things though, and I'm interested in what others may have to contribute on the subject.
Everyone responds differently. Some people will have 2000 total test on only 200mg per week test cyp other people will only have 500-800 ng/dl
there is no optimal level because it's not the same for everyone
How is that possible?
how is what possible? I've seen people on prescription test cyp test with levels around 2000 ng/dl
most people would be in the 800-1200 range though but that's my point you cannot base the same doses for everyone.
Just like any other drug in the world each person responds to a certain dose in a different way another person will.