Cleyon's picture
Cleyon
  • 0
2749

Blends, Good, Bad, and Ugly

ad

I was on a supplier's website today, and was looking at his blends. For an example

"10ml vial of 200mg Testosterone Enanthate, 200mg Trenbolone Enanthate, and 200mg Masteron Enanthate"

So that means for every ml you are injecting 600mg of stuff. All I have to say is that PIP is probably pretty tough. So the question came to my mind, "does anybody use this stuff?" well I know where to get that answer.

Let me know if you've used a supplier's blend, and what you thought of it. If you can give me the actual components of the blend that would help out too.

Thanks!

Nitti's picture

I've used blends and will in the future. Although I believe it's tough to maintain stability. Much better to run the compounds individually. Just less practical. But the bigger problem is how the hell do we know that everything that's supposed to be in them are actually present? Unless we send them out for testing we just don't know. I've heard stories of ppl paying mucho Trabajo for primo only to end up getting estro sides which leads me to believe they got test. It's just too hard to gauge and we really don't know. I like the blends (sometimes) for their convenience but its much better to use individual compounds IMO.

thepullmanator's picture

also something I have always noticed especially with tren test mast blends is that the doses are way off...I don't know much about tren but I do know it wins against test when it comes to receptors so that's why you run tren higher and the low test dose is just for sex drive and such....200 and 200 would give you crazy high amounts of estrogen am I right? due to the excess test floating around converting into esrtogen

Gsxr1000spanker's picture

The only other thing your could do is hold some tren e as well. So say inject half a cc of the blend and increase the tren level with a separate bottle on tren e.
I have never seen a brand get these levels right, at least for tren.
I have recently found a supplier that does a blend with a lower does of test e and higher dose of eq. It's the first blend i've seen that I would consider running.

In a promo × 1
Gsxr1000spanker's picture

Just going to change the above. You would really struggle to adjust long esters based in the way I have stated. You would have more of a chance with short esters.
And, I've never seen a brand get the test/tren levels right for ME to dabble with them.
Cheers

In a promo × 1
Catalyst's picture

This is the main problem, people tend to react very differently to tren / test ratios. As a general rule, lower test tends to reduce sides, but that isn't the case for everyone. With equal test to tren I wouldn't get a lot of sleep, but others dont have the same problem. Equally a friend of mine finds if he runs tren higher than test he gets a lot of anxiety and jealousy issues.

This is the problem with blends, there is no one size fits all approach and it's not practical for a manufacturer to make multiple varients.

UncleYoked's picture

The only blend I've ever used is sustanon, which is simply a blend of four diferent estered tests. I'm not even a fan of that really. Blends are made to make things easier and more convenient. But to me, theres nothing about running gear that is convenient. It's all about putting the work in and being dedicated to what you're doing. If that means I have to pull from multiple vials then big deal. I think it's fun anyways. Blends are also way less cost effective than buying multiple vials in the long run and they offer virtually no flexibility to adjust the doses of the compounds if needed.

MAC's picture

I like being able to control my compounds separately. I don't mind high dose single compounds, then I can cut down on how much oil I'm pinning which helps with multiple compound cycles. Some blends are cool though, like mast/prop/ace 150mg or 300mg per ml, that is straight. But high dose crazy blends I stay away from for the most part. Maybe ill try it one day