posted Fri, 06/15/2012 - 07:25
1760
toremifene
ad
I'm debating throwing it into my next pct rather than nolva. On paper it looks superior to nolvadex but I haven heard of to many people using it. How many of you all have used it? and what did you think of it?
also how did you dose it? I'm not having to much luck on the interned finding out how to dose it.
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
Also I was looking at the toremifene from extreme peptide.
everything ive tried from them has seemed pretty legit but I the could just be selling nolva with a different label lol
56tooOh and as far as the dose; tore is nmost comonly supplied in tablets at 88.4 mg which are labeled as and equal to 60 mg of torem base. Dosing protocol for this drug is 30-60mg/day
so using it in pct I would do something like 60/60/30/30???
My next pct would be clomid 100/100/50/50 then nolva 40/40/20/20 but instead of the nolva switch to tore
56tooReally bud I dont know the protocol and to answer your post above I buy from extreme too and everything I've ever bought from them was good
56tooUnlike aromasin and arimidex, toremifene is a serm like nolva and unlike the 2 AIs the two serms are actually good for your lipids because the serms tend to be somewhat estrogenic in the liver while blocking estrogenic activity in other parts. Estrogenic action in the liver is important in the regulation of serum cholesterol ( it tends to support HDL synthesis and LDL reductions). So in the case of toremifene you have a drug that blocks gyno while at the same time supporting improved cholesterol values ( which gives me reason to start using Nolva in lieu of aromasin from now on being I have LDL problems I inherited. And Toremifene has this positive effect on lipids more so than Nolva. I beleive the reason why its not more widely used boils down to availability.
zewiNothing wrong with that--most people use NOLVA cause it’s easy to get ahold of and everyone has it unlike Toremifene. Nolva and Toremifene act the same except Toremifen is about 5x stronger but weird thing is the side effects (rare on both) are even less frequent.