GH
First all I'm stuck on my phone so please excuse my grammer.
When we talk about growth hormone I'm pretty solid, iv been around the block more then once and have been using gh since 2007. What i can't find much on is dependency, or the actual need for. What I'm wondering is, if I wer to jump my ius up to say 6/8 ius a day while on cycle would it be posible to just go back down after cycle ? Keep in mind I run gh year round at an anti aging pace, never more then 3 ius a day even less at times. What I'd hate to happen is for my body to get used to 8 ius making 2 ius useless after my cycle.
now, iv done this befor and have not had a problem but I'm wondering if there's any solid proof that we do become immune to low ius after heavy use. Any thoughts ???????
Fyi move this to the gh thread if ya need to but it won't get much action.
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
This is a good topic. One I've been interested to know. I imagine just like any other hormone produced in the body , over supplementation may lead to poor natural production...... Just a guess tho. Have you researched on Google for medical studies on it?
your body isn't going to get "used" to making 8ius .. when you introduce anything exogenous your body senses that you have more than enough and the danger lies in your body shutting down natty production
opticxTheir is a negative feedback loop for hgh but it isn't permanent, wouldn't worry about it too much.
That cavalier attitude is no way to go about things. Fact is we really do not know the answer. None of the studies I have seen have looked at longterm effects on natural GH/IGF production after exogenous GH use.
bigwillyI also should add, I have been diognosed gh deficient by out doctor here at home. He has never once said that I would ever need to increase what's prescribed.
bigwillyMuch like the bible, every topic can and will be disputed, lol but my thinking was that since I don't produce naturally, or at least very lil, would high ius prevent me from going back down to an afordable regimen ? Just as 100 mgs of test dosnt do for me what it used to 8 years ago.
I also should have mentioned that the increase wouldn't have been over night, so maybe working back down would the smart move.
That's the real answer. With hgh, we don't have those answers and probably won't have any worthwhile data for a decade and even then it will largely be based on "questionable products". Will you desensitise to it in the short term? doubtful. Longer term, nobody knows.
opticxyour body responds by secreting somatostatin. Somatostatin effectively shuts down our own endogenous production of HGH for a few hours. After that time, our body will secrete GHRH and we will secrete some HGH. Thats really all I know about the negative feedback loop of taking hgh, other than that I cant really afford to take it nor would I really have a reason to unless its when im around 35 and I want to start supplementing my levels. Hgh isnt new but your right we really have no clue what high does of hgh or igf levels do to a person 30 years down the road. Not enough studies or time yet to tell.
you may want to explain what you mean by negative fb .. it confuses people