Donjoegains's picture
Donjoegains
  • 0
5346

Basic Test HGH Metabolism Question

ad

Hey guys, first time on here, I'm taking 500mg test e weekly, 2mg CJC w/ DAC weekly. I plan to cut pretty aggressively and really take advantage of what HGH will do for fat loss. My diet for cutting will be 6 meals each with 50g protein, 50 grams sugar intra workout, and 50g carbs post workout. That's only about 1600 calories. With HGH fat glycogen will be used before muscle glycogen, so I should be close to 100% full the entire cut. This would put me on 3-4lbs of stored body fat lost per week. I'm worried about crashing my metabolism. Is the 100 carbs daily enough to keep T3 at a decent level over the course of 8 weeks or would it make more sense to run a reasonable dose of T4 at 100mcg a day to ensure the same 3-4lbs of fat loss per week. Also, if I'm coming off 4000 calories 300p 650c 20f and drop immediately to 1600 for a couple weeks and then add in T4 what would that do to my metabolism? Would the 100mcg of T4 which will be converted into roughly 25mcg of T3 bring my metabolism back to 4000 calories or will it have to do with LBM and how many calories I need to sustain my current size?

Pericu's picture

You through around with technical terms and you clearly don't even understand what it really is what what mechanism those things create. There seems to be a lot of misinformation. Do yourself a favour and read into the guides on dieting we have on this board.

Further it seems that you have a screwed understanding on what certain compounds do. HGH is not a magical thing you take and suddenly, as you stated it, that the body priors fat over muscle. Simply NOT true. Even one of the strongest compounds "Tren" can't give you this desired effect and if you go too low with your calories, there'll be muscle waste, no matter what you take.

Pericu's picture

Ok, I already see that we need to get to it in a different manner.

I'd like you to really think about the following questions;
1. > IFG-1 prevents cells from receiving glucose, energy put in the body would be used followed by stored body fat when there is no food in the body. It's kind of like putting your body into auto keto except you can maintain full muscle glycogen the entire way through assuming you carb up enough around your workout.

  • So, that would theoretically mean, I could keep my performance up as I'm used too, while running a super low deficit? This is what you are actually saying. Cells stay full with glycogen but energy is primarily used from fat stores.
  • What happens with the carb taken in? What happens with the energy? If IGF-1 prevents cells from receiving carbs, they must go somewhere right? If it's not taken up into the cells, it can't be either stored as energy for later, neither can it be used for energy via ATP. So pleeease, enlighten me

As for muscle wasting, I can see the reason to eat protein regularly for the nitrogen content, what I can't understand is why the body would use any muscle if it has a positive nitrogen balance and plenty of stored body fat to use for energy.

Well, do you really think that you could only hit your daily protein needs with sparing your lbm at the same time? Maybe for a week or two, indeed, but with your theory you could run an approach like it for a couple of weeks without any lbm loss whatsoever.
Sorry do be a bummer, but even with the strongest compounds you'd lose lbm in such a great deficit.
Further I'd like to share an outtake of a studie on IGF-1 and protein sparing:
Feeding is a therapeutic cornerstone in attempts to counteract muscle wasting. Even when adequate amounts of energy are supplied, muscle catabolism continues, and although adequate feeding postpones depletion, 1 there is a strong need for more effective strategies to counteract protein catabolism.
Should speak for itself. If not, I gladly get deeper into detail

That being said, I'm eating 300p 700c right now daily and leaning out a bit.

Right, so you're trying to tell me, that with your current stats you have a daily caloric intake of at least over 4200kcal per day and still leaning out?! Either your NEAT is super high or you really need to tell me your magic trick here, becaue you said it yourself, right now you take no compound with it. Pretty decent natural metabolism I'd say.

I plan to drop calories to 2500 and do 350p 200c 30-40f (era's) while on HGH.

Ok, when you claim you lean out at 4200kcal per day, that means this isn't even your maintenance caloric intake. That means you plan on getting on a at least 2000kcal deficit per day. Right then, sounds like a good plan...I mean, not for me but okay,

Starting week 2 or 3 I plan to run 100mcg T4 to keep things smooth, I should get bloods but I don't have insurance and I feel very comfortable cycling T4 as I've done it fine with high amounts of T3

What are you hoping to achieve with that approach? Do you even know how T4 works? 100mcg will most probably do shit for you.
And is "High amounts of T3" for you?

And please, feel free to share studies and references with us, backing your claims. I'd really like to see those.

Makwa's picture

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink.

Pericu's picture

Sad but true. I just read his reply and honestly don't want to give it another shot...seems useless because he thinks he actually knows stuff..i'll leave him believing that

Makwa's picture
Pericu's picture

You did it already. What kind of wall do you recommend? Bricks? Wood?

Makwa's picture

I found out cinder block leaves a nice rosey glow.

Pericu's picture

Never tried this kind yet. I'll immediately go and find one and smash it against it just a tad more than usual, just to be sure

Pericu's picture

Exactly. Makwa gave you a direction, people gave you answers already and I did two long posts, one two try showing you what's wrong and the second was to support the first one and encourage you to questioning the things you believe.

I just want to say one more thing. You think about stuff which only will make a marginal difference. Ie. Like people looking for supplements without evrn having their nutrition in check. Focus on the real important things which are basicly said nutrition, proper training and consistency. If you really have control over these, you can start alternating those, Ie. thinking about supps, compounds and all other small variants.

Pericu's picture

What I think?
I think you actually read nothing someone in this thread has written and that you haven't looked on the links we gave you.

I'll try to make it as short as possible because I'm simply tired obviously talking to a wall.
1. No need for aas on a cut at least not unless you're near stage weight.
2. As makwa said, you must swim in money if you take HGH as a main cutting agent. Stop thinking those compounds will give you the results. No compound will boost your metabolism that much, unless we're talking about a certain compound, which I clearly avoid naming because I fear you'll even get the idea to take this certain compound
3. Read the basic information giving on this board. This should answer all your current basic questions and gives you a good guideline for setting up your dirt
4. Stop talking about compounds or mechanisms which you obviously don't have any idea off and stop reading into such complex mechanisms without having a decent knowledge about fundamental things.

Makwa's picture

+2 for continuing to beat your head.

Pericu's picture

Someone needs to get him kind of in the right direction. Hurts but still necessary.
Thanks for sticking with me here makwa!

Makwa's picture

I already gave you a guideline to follow.

Makwa's picture

This is where you are all fkd up. HGH is not going to stop your body from storing all the carbs you eat and you are not going to burn fat before carbs. Essentially, the HGH will help you to maybe burn a little more fat. End of story. Expensive ass way to diet if you ask me. Diet just like you would without HGH with the caveat that you may have to increase total cals a bit if the HGH is speeding up your metabolism to much and you are burning up lbm. You don't diet any differently when you are on HGH. Monitor your cals and adjust up or down if needed to meet your fat loss goals.

Pericu's picture

Whatever works best for you. The main thing is, that you find a dirt plan you could theoretically stick too 365 days a year (doesn't mean you should) but what's a diet good for when you fail at sticking with it.
So if the above setup works for you, I guess it's a good starting point and you can make adjustments on the road.

Further makwa and I just talked about it some weeks ago iii another thread. If you're not competing or making money with it, you have no business in going that low in bf%.
First off it's not maintainable, further it puts a high amount of stress upon you mentally as well as physically and most likely your performance will suffer. Everything in the 10-15% can already be pretty appealing visually, of course this will depend on different factors but I'd recommend on not focussing on a certain bf% but go with the mirror and what your performance in the gym tells you.

Makwa's picture

What is current bodyfat at? Maintaining 7% is unrealistic.

Makwa's picture

So you are looking to drop 8% BF in ten weeks. That is going to be tough to do without losing significant lean body mass, regardless of what you are taking. Any reason you only have 10 weeks?

Pericu's picture

And this is the problem. You act as if you already know that much but statements like these just prove that you have no idea about the most fundamental parts.
Stop reading about complex stuff when you don't even have the basic knowledge. Because otherwise stuff like this happens. You only get confused because you can't tell what's true and what's not and further you'll find yourself in a pool of information without filtering the good from the bad info and the useful vs. rubbish

irongame427's picture

There's no muscle glycogen and fat glycogen, glycogen is only present in the muscles and liver. Fat is fat,

Makwa's picture

You have a strange way of cutting my friend. Sounds like you are expecting that HGH to perform some type of miracle. You are relying way to much on the drugs thinking they are going to solve everything. You are going to damage your metabolism pretty quickly going about things the way you are. Stick with the tried and true methods to loose fat. It is tried and true for a reason...it works. What you have planned their looks like a trainwreck.

https://www.eroids.com/forum/training-nutrition-diet/weight-loss/your-fi...

irongame427's picture

Ya you'll lose 3lbs a week but in a month or so you'll stall and plateau and where do you go from 1600 calories? 1200? Even at 1600 say goodbye to your muscle, st 1200 forget about it. Then you wan talk about adding t3 or t4, the most catabolic drugs on the planet. You'll lose 3-4lbs a week but it's gonna be mostly muscle. Even on a 3000 calorie diet I lost muscle on t3.

You have zero knowledge of why to use these drugs, you take t3 so you can continue to eat a comfortable amount of food and be in a caloric deficit, that's the point of it. So you maintain on 3000 cals and you're not starving all the time, then you add t3 and all of a sudden your BMR has raised and you're now losing weight on those same 3000 calories. And your not using hgh your using ghrps and ghrhs, there's a massive difference between real hgh and stuff like cjc and ghrp. No dose of those peptides will come close to producing the effects of even a low dose of hgh.

And another note you say without hgh you would lose muscle, hgh is not very muscle sparing, the test you're running will do much much more for holding muscle then those peptides.

Makwa's picture

My head is fkn hurting from beating it against this wall

Pericu's picture

This dude has such a screwed perspective of everything!

Makwa's picture

My head is fkn hurting from beating it against this wall

chunkypbnj's picture

Hahaha!

Owes a Review × 1
chunkypbnj's picture

Why jump into a huge calorie decrease? Even with drugs you're going to feel like shit. Plus your fat loss is likely to stall and where do you reduce calories when you're already at a super low 1600. I would reduce calories 100-200 per week and let cardio and your gear shine. You may not even need to go so low calorie.

Owes a Review × 1
chunkypbnj's picture

Too big of a caloric deficit from the start. Gear & gh will bump your metabolism way up. I mean 3000 calories and you could possibly lean out and make gains. Ease in and listen to your body. Your plan is too aggressive. I would start no lower than 2500.

Owes a Review × 1
irongame427's picture

X2, if you maintain on 3000 and add hgh (he's not he's ghrhs and other peps) you will start losing fat on 3000 cals, like you stated I would drop to 2500 to start a 500ish caloric deficit. And when you stall you can go to 2300, or add some more cardio. But starting st 1600 is retarded. Seems like a crash get ripped quick diet.

This must be the New Years resolutioner crowd rolling in lol.