thetdog623837's picture
thetdog623837
  • 0
3139

My Experience With GW501516

ad

I have noticed a few people asking about gw recently and thought i would share my experience with it. I'm really into cycling and noticed all the hype,scientific research and reviews on other pages and how amazing it is. Im not going into depth on the effects *read up on it yourself) but basically its ment to shred fat and improve endurance drastically. I got 2 bottles hopefully going for a 2 month course. The product was thick like sludge and had zero taste which is what its ment be like. It is taken orally. The dose i started at was 1 ml/20mg a day, the highest recommended dose. I cycle 160 miles a week and know my speeds,times and recovery rates pretty well. Gw effects should be noticeable very quickly but wasn't doing anything for me in the first week. I continued to take 1 ml/20mg a day for a month to give it a chance until a bottle was finished. I didn't notice anything in this time and thought i'm not taken another bottle as I dont even know what's in this research chemical.

Conclusion- Does it sound too good to be true? Yes! Are the people that are writing these reviews actually done any cardio before they start gw?
( your cardio will improve if you go from nothing to doing cardio a couple times a week without anything)
There seems to be several forums promoting certain websites and getting "results" that are too good to be true!

If someone said to me would you recommend GW the answer would be NO! Do you know what's in these research chemicals? NO! I dont believe in any of these research chemicals now but thats just my opinion. Stick to products that are known to work (aas,HGH) Hope this helps people who are unsure on whether to buy, spend your money on something worthwhile TDog

Samzilla's picture

I tried it from two different peptide sources on here and it did nothing even at 25mg a day. Then for my pct I thought I'd try another source that's not on here since my friend recommended it. It cost a 100 dollars. But I gotta say it definitely did what they say it's supposed to at 20mg. I ordered 3 more and I'm running It again now along with lgd and s4 I spent almost 600 bucks on 12 weeks worth but you get what you pay for I guess because 10 days in the results are seriously phenomenal. The endurance and fat loss is really really good with legit gw. And the lgd is giving me pumps that remind me of when I was on dbol! I'm just guessing you got bad stuff, like I said first two times I got it, it did nothing for me. But from this supplier cardio is so much easier and I'm a smoker as well and this def helps. But mainly I take it for the awesome fat loss it gives, stacked with the peptides cjc no dac and ghrp6 I have a 62 pack for the first time in my life right now and it's pretty sweet Smile

Owes a Review × 2 In a promo × 3
Samzilla's picture

Yea man it really is!!

Owes a Review × 2 In a promo × 3
DrManhattan's picture

I have to doubt the legitimacy of your GW man. I've had great results as far as endurance and recovery from GW personally.

epoism's picture

Since there's that lingering tumor threat I use is sparingly, just in race situations. I take it in conjunction with clenbuterol during races. Power was good but that might also be a result of the clen. Also, I can't speak to its fat burning effects, since I am only using it a few days a week and during high intensity exercise (so I might be burning fat anyway).

In summary, I also picked up a few bottles and will use them until they are finished but may not restock.

DrManhattan's picture

The study on cancer was dosing rats at about the equivalent of you or I taking 2-3 bottles a day for 6 months straight. They were outlandish doses.

Notorious's picture

The thing is there is so many actual lab results that state otherwise! So many experiments in the pros and cons of use and abuse. I understand it is your opinion and respect that. But let me ask you something. If you ordered a pizza from dominos and it was just god awful horrible quality all around would you never order pizza again from anywhere because one company was bad? Was that some bunk product, probably. But doesn't mean good quality isn't out there. I agree with @Rustyhooker. There needs to be multiple comparisons from different companies

Notorious's picture

http://www.eroids.com/forum/hgh-peptides/peptides/gw-501516-2

I did some research for a fellow a few weeks back and that's one of the studies I found.

So, on the contrary, the highest dose given to the rats was 100mg per kg, which is only .1g per kg of weight. Now even the heaviest lab rat breeds (the zucker) get to about 2.2lbs aka 1kg. So no they were not given "grams"of the compound, only a tenth of a gram.

Now their best results (reduction in cancer, increase stamina, increased metabolism, etc.) and safest, was at 2mg-10mg for 5 weeks. 2mg/kg/ED. So 1kg is 2.2lbs, say you weigh 220lbs, that makes you 100kg, bringing it to 200mg ed, however, 1kg rat is double the average. Let's cut that in half. So technically you should take 100mg.. NOT 20mg. That's as far as the study goes, but agree to disagree.

Notorious's picture

So I decided to do the math and get things straight. I did my math right and if you want to get technical and covert what the rat took to human (they don't say what type of lab rat so we'll go with the average .5k) It should be 100mg most people say 20mg does nothing. By the math it would mean optimal use for 20mg you would have to weigh under 80lbs...That might be why. Even at 160lbs optimum use is 50mg. Some say otherwise. Not sure where 20mg came from (ill search a little more) but theoretically by the math it should be higher.