posted Sun, 09/15/2013 - 15:20
1402
HGH vs Steroids, what is better?
ad
Well HGH is way more expensive, so I'm guessing it's better? But I hear that it is hard to use because you have to keep it refrigerated and ALSO get bac water
What is the difference between muscle gains of HGH and Gear? And which results are better?
And is it true that HGH has to be refrigerated?
Handling Gear is easy, but idk about handling HGH
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
In simple terms
HGH : Creates more/new cells
Steroids : Enlarge existing cells
Together they MAKE new cells and ENLARGE new and old cells
Result : Ideal Combo. Throw in some control of Insulin and you have an extremely anaolic environment
For muscle it is definitely steroids, for health and anti-aging it is HGH. I am sure there is a synergistic effect when using both but for me I really noticed the hgh more when off cycle.
Obama BlowsBAC WATER IS REALLY CHEAP
Anonthey are synergistic of one and other
Obama BlowsYou're the first one to make an intelligent answer lol The rest of us just kinda mumbled
Hgh AAAAAND Steroids. <3
Obama BlowsX2
steroids
I go with XV on this one............... STEROIDS.
AnonIMO the gains between steroids and HGH are not even close, not at all. Hands down for me its Steroids.
HGH is like icing on the cake, or perhaps extra seasoning on the steak , the cherry on the sunday .
HGH is easier than gear in my opinion, and yes it does have to be refrigerated!!!! Depends on dosage 2-4IU is mainly well being and fatloss. HGH is the shit, i have only tried pharma grade. Check out the HGH section for more info on differences.