posted Mon, 04/22/2013 - 11:16
1554
+ 2 Manditory Source Discussion Forum
ad
I think all sources should be required to have a source discussion forum. Otherwise, it is very difficult for experienced users to give advice to noobies who are sitting ducks for scammers. I exposed a fraudulent source by posting blood tests and posting a link in the source discussion forum. Where else would noobies be as likely to see that information? They are not as likely to do searches for lab tests etc.
- Bookmark
- 2
- 0
AnonYou mean a separate forum for each source?
It's a good idea but unfortunately I don't think it's feasible.
There are hundreds of sources, even if BFG could make a forum for each individual source it wouldn't be fair since forums are in a fixed location there would be no rotation from active sources, if it's alphabetical you will start seeing source pop up like AAA-Anabolics or something.
I do like your idea but it would be a logistical nightmare.
It would be nice to have labs pinned directly to our supplier intros or review page.
Hey BB, what I'm talking about is the regular source discussion feature that pairs with the review feature. You get to it by clicking on the "Ask and Discuss - General information and discussions" button from a sources review page. It basically serves as a forum dedicated to that particular source. It's their intro page.
And here is a sample of a source that doesn't have one: http://www.eroids.com/reviews/buy-hgh-growth-hormone.com
AnonAh ok gotcha!
I was thinking you meant a forum where only that labs reviews and results are posted.
Could be a cool feature to have a lab tab
Yep, I like that idea too! Anything we can do to make it more intuitive for newbs to find good source-specific info will help keep them (sources) honest.
+1 BRO excellent idea.
Thanks - It's tough but we need to stay a step ahead of the ass holes!