Hitman187's picture
Hitman187
  • 0
1570

+ 2 bold cyp/ 1-test

ad

i recently just finished running a cycle of 1-test cyp. i loved the compound and the results i got from it, problem is im not too fond of the solvents used to suspend it (eo, guaiacol). theres no way injecting that shit in your body is good, so im looking at alternatives, and was thinking of bold cyp. has anyone ran both 1-test and bold cyp? just curious of how bold stacks up and the similarities and differences.

- K A P S I Z E -'s picture

Dunno who negged you for this but I fixed it. Have been wanting to try 1-test. If it's anything like Boldenone I'll like it cus I love eq

In a promo × 1
manbearpig's picture

A few years back people used to say that if the compound isn't mass produced (referring to 1-test) then there's a reason and it's garbage.

I've used it twice, and let me tell you this. It makes you look like fucking superman. Strength, vascularity, mass... It should be in high demand, and more labs should be making it. Right now there is only one lab that I know of who has it stocked right now. Maybe another one that is private.

Pip doesn't concern me unless I can't walk! And I rarely ever had pip when I used it from either lab.

Theonslaught's picture

I'm curious.
No supplier can get 1 test cyp cause its No longer made. When I say supplier I mean the manufactures of these hormones.
so I'm very confused.
Always wanted to try that of back on market.

biguriel's picture

Just because the usual powder sources can't get it doesn't mean there isn't someone out there making it. Or maybe it's still an old stock, who knows.

I know of two labs with it, gp and noble. Gp supposedly has a mass spec test showing there's really 1-test in there. I've used noble's and whatever it was, it was damn good stuff. Aside from the pip.

Theonslaught's picture

I didn't say powder sources.
I said manufacturers of the stuff.

But awesome if that's the case.
I'd love to try it. I wanna see gp mas spec.
Only used their oral though.

Makwa's picture

I just finished up some bold cyp a while ago. It was mixed with primo and mast so I haven't been able to run it solo per se but I would say lean gains, hardness, vascluarity were better from the 1-test. I just can't seem to reproduce with any other compounds that grainy look the muscles get from 1-test cyp. They both had a little bit of pip but nothing major, similiar to the pip I get from pharma sust. Both are good compounds. If EQ treats you well its nice to run a shorter cycle with the bold cyp, but if I had to choose one over the other to get ready for a comp it would hands down be 1-test cyp.

irongame427's picture

I havent ran 1 test but i have ran bold cyp a few times and bold cyp is just a faster acting version of eq so if youve ran eq think of it like that just kicks in ALOT faster. its an awesome drug if you get it from the right source who knows how to make it in a high mg (200-250) and not have it crash and no pip. Bold cyp is notorious for bad pip but the two sources i used it were great cooks and made it with no pip at all. From what Ive heard about 1 test is its prettty powerful in terms of muscle building its very androgenic, the total opposite of boldenone. One similarity is they will both harden you up nicely. bold made me vascular as hell and very hard and dry looking, i looked better on that cycle then i ever did before. I loved it. Its a slow mass builder but what you gain is all lean tissue no bloat and its easily keepable, I only ran it 10 weeks and i felt like i short changed my self not going longer and i ended up with about 13lbs of quality and i didnt drop a single pound when i came off. Based off the chemical structure of 1-test, it should be very dry and should not aromatize, changing the postition of the double bond from a 4-5 ( regular test) to a 1-2 double bond (1-test, where it gets its name) mean its incapable of converting to estrogen. without running 1-test but looking at the chemical structure and hearing all about it they both dry drugs and will leave you looking hard and dry and dense ( if your diet inst shit) 1-test is very androgenic while bold isnt, bold is a slower mass builder 1-test is most likely alot more powerful gains should be more rapid. Bold will boost youre appettite, help youre endurance. Decent strength gains with bold nothing crazy though. Not like one week you just become an animal its all gradual.

So like i said i havent ran 1-test so just take your experience with it and compare it with mine with bold cyp.

irongame427's picture

Hmmmm, so many damn possibilities. im getting more and more interested in 1-test now. If the results are similar to tren but without the appetite supression im in.

Makwa's picture

Don't forget about the overall also Smile

Makwa's picture

Never ran any tren so I can't compare it to that but I will say it is pretty impressive with no negative sides you hear about tren and was the staple in my last prep.

biguriel's picture

They say 1-test is similar to tren but for me that's not really the case. The effects are more along the lines of a strong DHT derivative, very good anabolic effect but clean lean mass, strong androgen but not so much as tren, sort of like mast but much more anabolic. Or, I'll say it, a bit like superdrol, really as a great glycogen loading effect, makes veins pop out all over etc.

It does not have the fat burning potency nor the mental side effects of tren and other closely associated steroids like dienolone or methyltren. The only noticeable side I get from 1-test is lethargy which I do not get from tren.

strongman6969's picture

I noticed much more vascularity with 1-test, and 1-test didn't seem to increase my appetite. Both 1-test and bold cyp gave me pip, more pip was with 1-test. Chemically, boldenone gets 5 alpha reduced in small amounts to dihydroboldenone(1-test) just like test gets converted to dht.

Hustle28's picture

How was the pip on the 1-test cyp?