posted Wed, 02/22/2012 - 11:20
1344
+ 1 Never judge a book by its cover
ad
I obtained some Kamagra Gel form one of the sources on eroids. The Packaging I can only describe as perfect. It was so good I would say I was 99% sure that it was going to be the real deal. Came to using it today and the contents of the sachets in no way resembled the real McCoy. The taste and texture was also vile. I’m not going to name the source at the point but will PM them to see what their thoughts and actions will be, since I think it’s only right to let them defend themselves and hopefully rectify matters. So for the guys who are so keen to pronounce things G2G before they have even tried their gear I would say as the old saying goes “Never judge a book by its cover”.
for those of you out there, that do NOT agree with this post, you have every right to disagree. However, it appears as if I must repeat myself regarding down voting. Down voting is made available to you all for when someone violates the rules. IT IS NOT MEANT FOR YOU TO SHOW YOUR DISPLEASURE ABOUT SOMETHING YOU DISAGREE WITH. If you have problems understanding this small point then please come talk to me. I would be happy to discuss it with you in private. Taking points for other than rules violations is not ok and will not be tolerated. Kapeesh???
- Bookmark
- 1
- 0
Thanks for your vote of confidence Jo. I am heading over to the supplier intro right now to give the outcome of my chat with the source
+1.... I understand your point. Just because it came in a pretty little package doesn't mean the quality is good. People are too quick to write reviews sometimes. This was a prime example why we shouldn't be doing that. After you sort things out properly you will then give a proper review and inform people what they should know. You're doing the right thing. The point of your thread is about judging gear too quickly based off surface level appearance. Everyone could take something away from this. If they aren't looking into this source or product then they may miss the point your making if it's only posted under a review or supplier intro. This applies to anything anyone gets from any source. Don't judge off appearance. Take the time to find out if the stuff is what it's supposed to be first.
Thank you BD
Wazup Labrats
i agree with you withholding the source until you get all your ducks in a row. i did the same thing earlier this week. it turned out i actually did a good review even when i got crap viagra... why??? cause they made it right. I let the world know...in the source review section that the viagra sucked but the replacement they sent was great and over all the service was great. People need to understand that some of these sources resell products they bring in. when they know they have a crap product they can remove it and move on but if they consistently sell crap i have a problem with it. so i agree that you are doing the right thing as long as you tell the whole story in the end.
I'm about to buy the same gear... Your withholding of information puts both of us in the same boat.
You could say (just as tactfully) "Heads up guys, I just got some questionable gear from source. I will PM them to see what their thoughts and actions will be, I'll update you on their reply. In the mean time you might want to hold off on your order".
And you would do this on the sources introduction thread.
Well I imagine the thread has already caused you to to proceed with caution on your order. I also know by now where to post it if and when I choose. If you want to PM me on the matter I am totally cool with that
Always check out a female in profile and look for an Adams Apple.............jusy sayin
Im pretty sure I seen a sex change show on tv and they had a surgery to remove an adams apple too. I don't know why I was even watching the show. Still can't judge a book by its cover.
Maybe you will just have to take the chance and judge it under the covers then. Good luck ;-)
Good point. There are always exceptions to the rule. Nobody wants a hand full of nuts when they are expecting a hand full of.......!
How is that helpful?
I believe I said "I am not going to name the source at this point". My point is not to go jumping to conclusions just on how something appears to be, until you have actually tried it. Too many people are quick to do that. Also too many people are too quick to slag sources off before the have given them chance to put things right. If they are not willing to put things right then it becomes a different matter entirely JMO
fair enough