Need feedback - Multi-votes for source, products, labs
So we're testing new voting widgets with multiple voting criteria, that will better represent various aspects of the source, product, lab.. (labs in the works still).
It'll probably look something like this:
- Multiple votes for Source Reviews
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Overall Experience
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Product Quality (This should be in "lab reviews", but we're making sources partly responsible for selling bad/good products.)
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Customer Service
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Delivery & Packaging
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Pricing & Ordering process
- Multiple votes for Product Reviews
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Effectiveness
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Tolerability (1=intolerable, 5=breeze)
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ??? need suggestions
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ??? need suggestions
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ??? need suggestions
I guess we could only have "Effectiveness" for products since it's the most important aspect? Tolerability is also a question of experience and character, so i don't now..
- Multiple votes for Lab Reviews
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ??? Product quality
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ??? need suggestions
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ??? need suggestions
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ??? need suggestions
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ??? need suggestions
I'm totaly blank here, aside from quality I've no idea what else would be considered important with Labs. I mean there is minimal to zero business interaction here (for us regulars), judging a lab by its label is kind of lame, prices are mostly regulated by sources (ugl prices at least)..
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
For the lab:
Maybe gear tested by source? Proof of quality
this could easily be faked
"Multiple votes for Product Reviews"
*effectiveness
*PIP? (possibly break tolerability down for the less educated on gear)
*Smooth (thick as close to some amps or smooth injection as with most ugl carriers)
*Clean (as in no floaties, this happens to me often)
*recommendable (would you recommend this product)
Best I can do on the fly, with some time I could maybe come up with some more logical criteria.
sgtstedankoHell, I don't know either. Maybe pip. Some dudes gear is pip free, while others same kicks like a mule : ) maybe if the guys a douchebag to deal with or not. I steer clear of sources that are Dicks, or treat their customers like shit, no matter how good their gear is. Just please make sure its easy on my fat phone fingers.. nice work
limejellyjamcomment deleted, user has at least 22 fake accounts
~BFG
dbolzFor the labs i would suggest hormone quality/content, along with solvent quality. Also Sterility (no nose hairs in my vials) and consistency not one vial 7ml and the other 12ml.
For the products i would suggest sides expected, value for money and again consistency
TxBigBoyYou could add in PIP. Some labs have much more pip than other and some pride themselves on having painless gear.
that would fit under torelabiegsdflsgdfgslity
TxBigBoyTrue, well damn lol yea no clue other than quality
sgtstedankoLol. Great minds thibk alike. We were typing @ the same time, or something : )
TxBigBoyVery true brother!