whiteNcrispy's picture
whiteNcrispy
  • 86
1604

Rotating Test Esters Each Cycle

ad

I've heard on the grapevine that one should rotate esters each cycle, e.g. Test E, then Test C. Is there any legitimate purpose or reasoning behind this?

th3joker's picture

I like to start a cycle with a short ester and a long and then switch to just short at the end.

So I'll kick off with test-p and get the levels up quickly while I'm waiting for test-c or test-e to kick in then I'll drop the test-p until 2-3 weeks before the end of cycle and then switch to test-p and drop the long ester. I'm ready for PCT earlier but I'll have got the levels up quick to start with so it seems like a longer cycle as its working from very early on.

No reason to rotate between cycles that I can think of though.

wailer's picture

sounds bullshit

Roid Noid's picture

between test-e and c it makes little sense, however between prop, sust and c/or it makes more sense. People say test is test is test but I dont feel that way, the results i get from different tests is evident to me, and clearly should be used according to goal. I go up and down the weight ladder and bulk/cut dry/wet/ all play a factor when running test, for me they do.

whiteNcrispy's picture

Nice, good answer. I didn't figure it should matter at all. There's always bro science floating around. That's why I ask questions. Thanks!

boots2asses12's picture

hahah. Never herd that about c tho. thats interesting.

Juicin14's picture

yep test c has just a little longer half life than test e.

wailer's picture

yeah babeee

Carlos Danger's picture

I've heard to rotate long ester and short ester cycles. Just to keep the body confused and from getting too comfortable. Intersting topic though. IMO Test is test. Wonder what everyone else thinks?

whiteNcrispy's picture

That's kind of what I figured.