skalpa's picture
skalpa
  • 0
3143

+ 5 TRENBOLONE - explained

ad

been researching tren quite extensively recently. its by far the most tatalizig compound to me and i've been gathering as much information about it as i can. i came accross this post on another forum and thought you other eriders would appriciate it and take something from it.

http://forums.steroid.com/showthread.php?508157-Atomini-s-all-you-need-t...

strongman480's picture

does anybody else find it kind of odd that this atomini guy says he has ran tren for 5 years and doesn't look at all impressive.good read I agree, but the fact that this dude isn't ripped or massive raises a red flag for me. if someone can't walk the walk and talk the talk how creditable is this person?

mikebuie's picture

old post but still, +1 couldnt agree more. been saying almost the same thing a lot lately

katharina13's picture

i agree with you. maybe his gear was just bunk.

Atomini's picture

Listen, buddy... Just as how the average joe blow out there thinks that AAS are magic pills that allows you to wake up the next morning looking like Jay Cutler (and we all facepalm at that don't we), we too within the AAS using community have very similar misconceptions among ourselves. We tend to think that the more knowledgeable and more experienced members on a forum are gigantic beasts when we see they have 5+ years of cycling under their belt or whatever. The truth is that less than 20% of us have the genetics to be anywhere NEAR as huge as a pro, let alone the fact that many of us aren't even aspiring to have physiques like that. I certainly am not! Almost 4 years ago I got pretty damn big, I reached about 225 lbs. at 10-13% bodyfat but I lost it all when I hit a period where I couldn't maintain my nutrition and training. It takes A LOT of consistency in one's nutrition to get big and remain that way, and it can be lost very easily by a little slip-up here and there.

I am happy where I currently am, and being the biggest motherfucker in the gym is NOT my goal, and nor could I achieve that with the lifestyle I currently have! And I don't know how old you are, but in time you will realize that too! I have a type of physique in mind that I wish to obtain and maintain, and i'm happy with that.

Not every experienced vet and AAS user has to be a big huge massive cow, you know... I hold 2 jobs, one of which is ABSOLUTELY IMPRACTICAL to have a physique that is massive. If I get too big and heavy, there goes my ability to do all kinds of things efficiently because i'm now hauling around this extra weight on my body slowing me down. I am also a university student, so fit that life schedule in there as well! I don't have every hour in the day to perfect my meals with impeccable timing, and training like you think everyone else does. Sometimes reality gets in the way of things. I'm constantly striving towards other goals such as earning my M.D.

Insinuating that someone doesn't know their stuff just because they're not "ripped or massive" is a giant display of faulty logic on your end. You need to educate yourself a bit on logical fallacies, buddy. You shouldn't judge a book by its cover!

mikebuie's picture

i think strongman just means that if the guy says hes been running tren for 5 years and looks like that, then maybe he might not really be as knowledgable as he seems. it plants the seed if doubt in my eyes when someone talks like theyre experienced, notice i say experienced and not knowledgable, yet doesnt look the part. it makes me wonder is all. i know damn well though that lots of guys are incredibly knowledgable when it comes to AAS, dieting, and lifting, but that doesnt mean they want to follow the lifestyle to a T is one way i can think to explain it. to me though its like book smarts - more often than not whats taught and learned on paper and in books doesnt always transfer over into real life quite the same. you can research and be taught for years but never truly understand it and be able to teach others imho until you've DONE AND LIVED it - experienced it. am i making any sense. sorry man, i dont mean to offend and hope i havent, just tryin to share my opinion even if we dont agree

edit: i posted this before actually reading the link like an ass (very informative and easy to understand btw, straight to the point and hits them all). i stand by everything i said, but not so much in relation to you though. i can see in your avatar you've definitly put some work in and also see how your size is in direct relation to your goals. theres many others on this site though that seem to be all about giving diet and cycle advice, yet have no pics of themselves whatsoever ... just makes me wonder and is why i say i stand by what i wrote

strongman480's picture

using the excuse that your job gets in the way of your gains is not acceptable. I am a construction worker and I can still manage to keep my body weight. If you want to be big it can be done with a little more work. I said your post was a good read. you had a different pic 6 months ago and you did not look like you even used anabolics. I'm glad you are happy with your body. it is your body after all. I have a different goal than you and I will be "the biggest motherfucker in my gym" I'm going for a pro card so in time i will realize that I will be the best i can be. In order to be that big there are things that you have to do and also sacrifice and i am ready to do so. Sorry I offended you, was just stating my opinion. let's agree to disagree.

Atomini's picture

I never once stated that my job gets in the way of my gains. I simply stated that one factor involves the fact that having more mass than a particular point makes me more ineffective at that job, and the other factor involved is the simple fact that I just do not wish to be an absolutely massive guy. If you want to push towards a physique that will get you your pro card, then all the power to you and I commend you for it - but that's not my desired goal. The general point I am making here is that whether or not someone is "ripped and massive" is not indicative at all of the depth of their intellect on a particular subject, which in this case is the subject of anabolic steroid use. I happen to be someone who is extremely knowledgeable in this particular field, but whether or not I have the physique of a competitive bodybuilder shouldn't have any bearing on that. I am the chief writer for www.steroidal.com in case you did not know - you should check out my works on the main site and the forum.

At the end of it all, no offense was taken. I just feel that passing judgement over the depth of someone's knowledge based on their appearance is... well, the wrong way of going about things.

spartacus91's picture

agreed bro some people choose a different path....me for example will go up to 85 kg and luck massive on my ecto frame then after i have finished my training will drop back down to 66 kg because of the type of training and intensity of it...diet will not help for royal marine/para training its common to go back to your genetic weight...

Gixxerboy07's picture

Good read. Very informative.

snuka2012's picture

Don't stop posting if u find something else of interest...just do the right way next time. We all learn from or educate each other...it's a good find.

snuka2012's picture

yup

killroy's picture

Even though this was C/P from another site... I still read it and thoroughly enjoyed doing so. TBH if i came across it on that other site, I'd probably just skim through. lol I find it hard to pull a tl;dr on eroids. +1

Owes a Review × 1 In a promo × 2
HllwdBdBoy's picture

This is a copyright fiasco waiting to happen LOL!
Other sites don't like us poaching their info

Nitti's picture

All you need to know about tren right here. Great info from the king of trenbolone!
http://www.basskilleronline.com/finaplix.shtml

You should post links, not copy and paste entire articles of other ppl.

finafan's picture

I agree with this. I think the problem is that members gave karma for this. That and the post is not edited.

finafan's picture

Just edit it. Delete it and post a link.

sc2216's picture
madmash's picture

Read the first sentence buddy! He says it's a quote from another site

sc2216's picture

lol yeah ... I guess I missed it or he didnt make it clear enough about the "quote"

snuka2012's picture

Nevertheless it would've been proper to provide the synopsis and then a link rather than copy and paste.

levelup's picture

well played

snuka2012's picture

Nice read...but not likely the OP is the writer .

Hench's picture

you did your homework. good job.

jpal's picture

nice read +1

OmNom's picture

I enjoyed reading this def giving it a plus, you gave this a lot of time.. One thing I'll say is I find more hair loss on straight test cycles than I do high tren low test.. At least so far.. If I were to imagine the reason.. test and tren fight for receptors but tren always comes out on top.. So you have more useless test floating around to convert to estro and dht