I keep reading threads here and on other sites that beat this topic to death, so I am loathe to do the same. However, I do question the conventional wisdom surrounding test ester blends and injection frequency.

Typical Bro science states that one has to inject EOD to fully use the prop ester.

Standard Sus:

30 mg testosterone propionate 2 days
60 mg testosterone phenylpropionate 4 days
60 mg testosterone isocaproate 9 days
100 mg testosterone decanoate 14 days

(Any many UGLs are upping the mgs to 400/500, putting that prop/pp mix somewhere around 150mg)

So at 2 days, you have 15mg test as prop left along with approx 45mg of test as pp, and the iso and deca have hardly been touched.

At day 4 you have 7.5mg of test as prop with 30mg of test as pp, approx 45 mg of test as iso and deca still hardly touched.

So why are injections every 3.5 days seen as "wasting test prop?" The prop went active, then the pp went active, then the iso, you get the point.

I would understand if the blend was not all test. For example, suppose it was test p and eq in a blend, then yeah... injections every 3.5 days would mean your test levels would never be stable. With sus though this is not the case. It is all test, when test prop starts to half, test pp is there to pick up the slack. When the pp halves, iso is there, and so on.

So what I see is:

1. Sus gives you the quick start of prop and pp along with the "stable levels" people want, while the iso and deca build up, which is what most folks are recommending anyway... prop kicker right?

2. Once the deca hits, that is all that is gonna matter unless you are using it at very low dosages just for sexual function while featuring other anabolic compounds. (which IMO is a perfect use for a test blend such as sus)

Maybe I'm a dinosaur, but what am I missing in this debate?