Bobbie1mr's picture
Bobbie1mr
  • 0
2290

No gains from test e and eq

ad

Calling them out by announcing their ranking is the same as mentioning them by name. Also, I hope you kept some extra to be tested because all the mass specs look excellent so I would hope you realize that it isn't as simple as "claiming" someone has fake stuff anymore. Get your gear tested or you have no legs to stand on. And read the rules more carefully. I'm sure you think you found a way around them but this is NOT allowed.

EDITED BY MODERATOR

Dickkhead's picture

It's seems like it's always new folk coming in and complaining that some otherwise reputable lab is selling bad gear. The rest of us seem to have blossomed and grown on the products of these suddenly sheister operations. The noobs have no clue as to the economics of producing gear and why it DOES NOT line the pockets of suppliers to under-dose anything. Do labs sometimes have problems with the companies that supply them the raws they use in production. Yes, certainly; it happens. But, the accusation here is one of deliberate intent to defraud. I agree with rustyhooker - your "proof" needs to resist the most stringent scrutiny if your gonna run your mouth at this level . . .

vhman's picture

Quit yapping about how much you know and just post your results. Everyone here has done many cycles and we don't go around making claims unless we have solid backup. It's pretty simple. Maybe that's the problem....

vhman's picture

I hear people talking about bunk gear, but 99% of the time they never produce actual testing. Everyone here wants reliable sources and REAL proof if things work or they don't. That is all I'm asking; nothing more.

JRTX956's picture

Remember guys, he is a experienced user ! Dont flame him to hard lmao calling the EQ fake at 400mg ? Really ... first off, even if you where where dosing the EQ correctly it wont kick in till around week 12-14... and at 400mg. Your just throwing your money away... bump it up to 800mg then come back when your on week20 of EQ and then let us know if you see a change... did you even frontload your EQ? Probably not ... I just finished a 20 week eq run with the source your talking about and loved every bit of it.. Smile

the_gainz's picture

This is not the place for source reviews if that's what your trying to do. And I have a feeling this won't end well with you bashing a source on the forums

ac89's picture

If you are looking size you aren't eating close to enough calories. From what you listed that is 3200 calories a day. Your lifting 6 days a week for 90 minutes doing high intensity! You are going to be burning a lot more calories than you think in the gym as well as through out the day. Kick the calories up to 4200. Also I would take more off days and maybe do some lo intensity workouts and see what happens.

Also are you getting bloating?
and eq can take 9 weeks

jm99's picture

Why did you say in your review of them that "Quality is good been using for 22 days. Having sides like oily skin and breakouts and strength increase," if you're now saying that you haven't seen any oily skin or breakouts.

Now I've never used this source so can't speak for the quality of their gear but recently ordered some and would certainly hope its not bunk.

Catalyst's picture

You've now been told several times by several people you can't mention source names in the forum, yet you keep doing it. You want a mod to kick you?

Catalyst's picture

You don't get to decide who goes where, it's a forum, you're addressing an open audience. I've try to help you avoid mod conflict and you think you've got the right to talk to people like that? You need to grow up.

-2

Nitti's picture

You cannot mention sources by name or rank or anything else that suggests who they are. You have to take that stuff to their supplier discussion page. You have been warned and you post edited already. Stop mentioning sources here or you will be forcing my hand in taking further action!

Catalyst's picture

I'd be careful the way you're putting this over. Whilst you may not have named the source, you have made it clear who it is which isn't allowed.

Without knowing about your diet etc it's hard to comment. I would, however, suggest you've got the EQ wrong. 400mg is possibly too low, as well as 8 weeks being a little premature to comment on how effective it is.