Savfile's picture
Savfile
  • 19
1933

Eq?

ad

why is there so many damn mixed reviews on this substance? Also is it really necessary to run only in longer than 16 weeks?

Jc74s's picture

Can you explain in details when you say manipulating test

jpal's picture

If ran properly eq is a great compound

Savfile's picture

I guess the mixed reviews and cycle length are linked cause I have seen a lot of poor things said but almost all from 10-12 week cycles. Thx for the info bros.

Savfile's picture

This is taken from another site
EQ is complete shit!!! It won't add any extra muscle, it adds a little definition if your in the single digit bf and thats only after like 10 weeks of being on it. Then you start to notice a little vascularity which is almost always caused by high bp. I'm not saying you have to be on tren for it to be a real cycle either. I just think there are much better things that can be ran in a cycle. Masteron for example

Most of the complaints are similar to this

Savfile's picture

you realize this is the point of asking questions, if youd like I can list several other people with similar complaints, as you will notice I said most of them ran it 12 weeks or less. Eq is an amazing bulker you know from personal experience?

Savfile's picture

again you are just proving my reason for posting it, clarity

j223's picture

Why is there mixed reviews?? Your recommended dosage is incorrect. Also yes 16 is the MINIMUM. Ideally over 20 weeks.

That is why there are mixed reviews, because people do not run it high enough dose or long enough.

logan's picture

You are 100% wrong eq does not need to be taken for 20 weeks and a 20 week cycle is to long to begin with,unless you want your natural test levels to be shut down severely. The ester in eq takes four weeks to build up and by week six is peaked. the only reason you should run it for 16 weeks is because you get the maximum effects for an additional 10 weeks. You can run it as short as 10 weeks but your gains will be minimal. Extremely long cycles are not recommended for younger people as it could lead to TRT.

j223's picture

I never said I recommended for people to run 20 week cycles.

I was just pointing out how running a 12 week cycle of EQ is a waste. That would be like running dbol for 2 weeks. Sure you will gain a few pounds but your not getting the most out of the drug.

I do agree long cycles are not for the average gym rat, but EQ ideally is run past 16 weeks.

logan's picture

Fair enough, but be careful how you word things it reads like he should run it for 20 weeks. People with limited knowledge on AAS may take that and run with it. Next thing you know your advice that you had every good intention with now hurts someone.

mrgut28's picture

Laying down some knowledge! So much misinformation around here. Glad some people like you are helping the misguided because I don't have the patience for it.

logan's picture

Thanks brother, that's what I'm here for. I picked up a thing or two spending 23 years in the gym.

Savfile's picture

Tried giving you a thumbs up but won't let me. I must be to much of a newb.