posted Wed, 07/31/2013 - 10:19
3150
Are you able to do a cutter with Equipoise?
ad
It sounds like EQ really stimulates your appetite. This fact seems like it would make it impossible (or at least very difficult) to include in a stack for a cutting cycle. The vascularity and quality gains it produces is what has me interested. I'm just researching options for my next cycle which will be a cutter since I will be entering a show. Just wondering how much it reallly stimulates your appetite and if anyone has successfully used it in a cut.
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
WithdrawlI never get increased appetite from EQ. Seems like some do and some don't. I love eq. I use it for every cycle whether I'm cutting or bulking.
AnonEquipoise is one of my favorite compounds for cutting and bulking. If I'm not running a short ester based cutting cycle, Equipoise will always be in my long-estered cutters. The appetite side is dependent upon person to person, worse for others, but it still comes down to self-control. If you have no problem dieting and being strict in general, than you're not going to go destroying your cut because of the EQ hunger. Stuff your face with cinnamon rice cakes and water if you have to, that's what I do lol.
Yes,,its great for cutting but you do have to control your appetite.
You will give you a distinct hard,,vascular appearance with superior
strength gains.
that vascularity is what has me drooling about it. Planning on being down to 5% BF so I am really looking to make those veins pop.
I recently ran EQ/Test/var for a cutter and it was amazing. Ive only ran test/var before, but EQ gives me more vascularity and muscle fullness than var by far. As far as appetite, it may have increased it a little bit, but it wasnt as if I was drooling every time I thought of food. The hardest days were ones where I was off from work, and really had nothing to do but sit around.
I will run EQ with any cycle I do from now on. Most people complain that they got no gains from it and only saw a little bit of vascularity increase. This is because their bf% was too high before starting EQ. Lower bf with EQ is better results. I ran it with a low dose test 300mg/wk, and the vascularity I had was insane. Granted I am always between 8-10bf% year round, but it was stupid. I had more veins in my abs and chest that guys at my gym had on their forearms. EQ is worth it to me. If you want to get huge and add tons of strength, maybe not, but if you want minimal gains, and to drop bf, I highly recommend it from personal experience
thanks for your input. I think I will definitely keep EQ on my radar for a possible compound for my next cycle. The vascularity I hear people talking about with it is what really has me interested.
Your welcome. If you have low body fat and want more of a recomp/cut cycle id go with EQ. Honestly, Ive always been in incredible shape. Im genetically gifted, and thank my dad big time haha. but I usually am at 220 year round and always have a 6 pack and veins everywhere, but EQ is ridiculous. Highest I went up was to 225 on cycle and I didnt eat to cut, but I didnt gain any fat at all. granted I do eat very clean. It really is a great compound. I had people staring at me everywhere I'd go and they would comment on my physique and vascularity. 600mg EQ worked great for me.
RustyhookerEq booms appetite thru roof. But like zewi said below add var til pct. Var hardens and kills appetite. Eq will boost vascularity etc. var will boost strength.
If adding mass i run eq/test high then finish with test low.
1-4 prop 150eod(blend with eq to cut pip)
1-12 test e 600/week
13-20 test e 300/wk
1-18 eq 600/wk
16-22 var 75/day half am/pm
20-22 prop 100 eod optional
I like aromasin. 6.25Ed when estro pops up. You'll have to adjust at time of test drop.
If running something like this for a show, what would be the optimum week in this cycle to hit the stage? I am thinking it would be somewhere around week 18-19 while the EQ is still there to reap the benefits of the increased vascularity.
RustyhookerStage prep is very different than just looking great. I'd hate to steer that wrong for you. Definitly chat with the PRO tags here as they compete. Some stage guys drop test completely to drop any extra water. Plus extra tricks. But please...check with competitors to dial that in. I'd like to see you posting up 1st place win!
Thats why I am asking all these questions right now. My show isn't going to be until May next year but I am trying to get all of these dumb thoughts and questions out of my head right now so that everything is dialed in when it comes time to start my next cycle for the show. Planning on taking 1st in the masters and at least placing in the top 3 with the young kids. thanks for your help so far.
AnonYou can cut with almost every roid. A strict cutting diet will yield low bodyfat
I know that diet will dictate whether it is a cutter or bulker, but since it apparently increases appetite it seems like it might be a struggle to restrict calories while using it. Just wondering how much of an appetite increase people experience while using it. Is it just a little increase or something that wants you to eat the entire fridge everytime you open it.
That's something you'll hafta figure out on your own brother. It affects some people's appetite more than others. I like Zewi's cycle he posted below but I would start with the 600mg/week dosage first since you haven't ran it before
Vewifor me its the fridge, but that's ok, I just eat more meals but they are smaller.
VewiYes you can do it.. Here you go..
One that I like without Tren in it.. 
1-4 test p @ 150mg EOD
1-16 Test E @ 300mg a week
1-16 EQ @ 600mg a week(or 800mg your choice)
15-20 Anavar @ 75mg ED
17-20 test-p @ 150mg EOD
This is exactly what im running ATM except with DBol 1-4 @ 40mg ED
The kick times work well
Test P and Dbol for NOW
Test E for LATER
EQ for MUCH LATER
Dbol to add mass/strength at the start
Var and Eq should finish me off lean and vascular.
Cheers Threshy
Looks like a good cycle. I think I may look into running something like this for my next bulk, except I'll drop the var for the bulk and maybe bump up the testE a bit.