tread-m's picture
tread-m
  • 0
  • GURU
1925

T-4 or T-3 debate pertaining to HGH

ad

I know some of you are HGH users and many will go way over the 2iu recommendation as I do. I would like to see how many people are interested in the debate over T-3 or T-4. I tend to lean T-4 given the evidence appears to indicate the T-3 is relatively stable while on even 4-6 iu's and that if anything the T-4 drops off. By taking T-4 the body will convert 80% to T-3 anyway...or so the the new science indicates. I really hope there are enough HGH users here to have a discussion about your experiences either way. I am informed by a couple of top competition builders that argue the T-3 works great for them but I am always looking for what works better and the T-4 argument seems sound....let me know what you think and make your argument either way. I will post a good link if the discussion actually breaks out for those interested to read.

HG63's picture

I take it you have been reading Mr Roberts...

I agree with you on the T4 over the T3, although I think the 80% conversion rate is a tad high. According to published articles T4 is normally present in human serum in approximately 50 fold excess of circulating T3, and accounts for more than 90 percent of the circulating protein-bound iodine. T4 is 99.9 percent bound to serum thyroxine binding proteins (TBP). With less than 0.03% of the total circulating T4 being unbound and therefore biologically active I feel the 80% is high. However, high or not, it is a fact that the majority of T3 is derived from the 5’-deiodination of T4.

For me, there are two key facts that win over the T4 debate.

  1. Flooding the body with T3 only creates a negative feedback system.
  2. GH works best not because of the amount of T3 but because of the affect the conversion of T4 to T3 has on GH.

So with the half life of T4 being ~6.5 days (1.6 days for T3), and the therory of the conversion that aids GH, it does seem logical that keeping optimal levels T4 and letting the conversion take place would benefit over taking T3 outright.

Time for more research.

HG63's picture

Messing with insulin is some wicked stuff. My thought is you are asking for trouble with it. If you do go there, you need to regulate by testing 2/3 times per day. It's not like 3 or 4 or hg you can just do am or pm and go on about your biz.

Since your post, I have been doing more hardcore research into 4 and the theory of conversion that revs up hg not just the presents of 3. The problem with doing search on "normal" internet is that you get flooded with bodybuilding crap. Mind you, I take my workouts very serious but I want the pure science and the intended use first. Then we can associate it for how we need it. So as I look, I am seeing more about the 4 conversion. And when I have even more, I want to post.

If the 4/hg conversion theory is correct, then it sure would benefit the TRT/HRT longevity arena as well as the bodybuilding arena. And of course the actual intent which is for small statue children.

Since our growth (bone wise) has long since stopped, the question is, does the rev'n of hg with 3 or 4 do us any good in the long run. Sure you get tight soft skin and some fat loss, but is it worth it in the long run if you don't have the $$ to keep it going year over year.

Recent studies have shown that to gain the full benefits of hg you will spend on average 8k a year (via legal means).

So I don't know bro. I think the theory of 4 with hg is better than 3+insulin and hg. I have not, nor intend, to do 3+, but I will try the 4 with hg. Besides, my rat is itching to part of a clinical trial again.

HG63's picture

One other thought as I weed through the research. T3 is a product of the thyroid. Just as we PCT to help bring the body back into balance, there is no PCT for T3. This leaves the thyroid S.O.L. so to speak. Repeated on/off without taper can (in simple terms) fuck up the thyroid. And yeah, pm me. My rat likes gh