posted Wed, 04/04/2018 - 04:03
276069
+ 46 Promo whore Blacklist
ad
A table of users with more than 8 reviews written in a running year
| User | Reviews | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Matthew4567 | 13 | Banned |
| asidphreak | 12 | Active |
| Milkshake7272 | 11 | Active |
| DelicateE | 11 | Active |
| TStark1 | 10 | Active |
| Trinitykiller69 | 10 | Banned |
| Villa52 | 10 | Active |
| ThundaWunda | 10 | Active |
| haapinessgains | 10 | Active |
| Fra22 | 9 | Active |
| 1waytickettogains | 9 | Active |
| nails337 | 9 | Active |
| selfster19 | 9 | Active |
| carolinehernandez013 | 9 | Banned |
| TestingInProgress | 9 | Active |
| Senshi47 | 9 | Active |
| Dkoon211 | 9 | Banned |
| Cloudy | 9 | Active |
| bgonz174 | 9 | Active |
| pocketaces | 9 | Active |
| Goodfella1118 | 9 | Active |
| Roastbeast86 | 9 | Active |
| MEXVOL | 9 | Active |
| Treninator | 9 | Active |
| Tat2man | 9 | Active |
- Bookmark
- 46
- 0
RustyhookerAnd its easy to buy a review if youre dirty....hense this whole forum is here
RustyhookerThose origional rules/ideas make sense. So when i see 8..10...19....ya, somenes playing bs.
AnonI am in favor of keeping the current limit.
I like it. Good story. Btw I do cruise but do not advocate it.
I once wrote 1 source review for 12 different paid for items. I included gear pics in the review too. It was a great cycle. So I think with good planning it's not that hard to obey the limit.
I think one of the big issues for the number of reviews is the type of compounds being reviewed. If someone is pumping out a dozen reviews on the basics like test, deca, EQ, tren, adrol. Something is fishy unless it is a twelve month perma cycle. You can only run so many cycles/yr using your standard compounds. Now in the example I posted below running a bunch of compounds from different sources during a prep, the reviews could add up pretty quickly.
The other tricky bit here is whether or not it is a promo or something they actually bought. If all the reviews are just coming from promos it should be alot less since I think this gaming the system.
In all practicality, if someone is rating more than 10 sources a year, that is probably excessive. You don't need that many sources to find quality gear and are probably just source hopping to get free gear on promos and watering down the review and rating system.
Your example is extreme. I find it unlikely that a source wouldn't be selling several of those "one off's " peptide source, HGH source, PCT source, AAS source. There is no requirement from eRoids to review. Obviously, it's encouraged but there must be a balance; people were gaming the rankings by reviewing small orders and not cycles.
Yeah, it is extreme, just going with the list there if I wanted to consolidate items from sources I could get by with 8 sources that I am comfortable with for those items. I could easily come up with separate sources that I am comfortable using for all of those items, too. Always good to have backup sources for items also.
Now using those 8 sources and let's say I wanted to try a couple different brands of GH while off cycle or testing out a couple different source's men's health items I could realistically be pushing 12 or more reviews.
Now let's say I run another cycle with same sources, but just 6 months later, My old review rankings have dropped off, would it now be appropriate to review again. Then I would be going way over 10 reviews.
I may be an extreme example and I don't think you want to make the norm to fit an extreme example.
Above 10 reviews and members would be running out of fingers.
Just sayin.
Anon14 reviews in a rolling year.
https://www.eroids.com/users/bulldozer5
The last 3 victims have all the same profile pic??
Dude is on a spree.
Just to be clear (as I understand it): 8 is the limit, at 9, you get to hold the member's arms behind their back while the Mod(s) wack his or her pecker to their (the Mod(s) ) satisfaction.
It use to be at 10 the member (or the member's member so to speak) was disciplined.
If there is a lower threshold for repeat offenders, it is yet to be publicized.
I always thought it was 10. Over that and you got spanked. Now we are down to 8. What next?
7 ????
Actually, I think they were getting spanked at 10, now they are getting spanked at 9, you have to admit
there were several people who kept dancing up to the line and every time 1 of their reviews would time out, within 48 hours would post a replacement review. Greg also said "Understanding there are always exceptions to the rule, I reserve the right to look at contributing factors .....", I can't speak for Greg, but I would think one contributing factor could be a Pro tag or a known competitor.
I guess if you are running most of your stuff from one source you may be reviewing 8+ compounds but it is only one review so no big deal. I personally think the big deal is when all the reviews are promo reviews or the majority of them are and then walking that line when one expires hop onto another promo. You could easily run cycles for the rest of your life just on promos. Guys are unfortunately doing this and it is fairly easy to spot once you start reading through all of their reviews and looking at pics. Reviews are clearly being faked or they just half ass the review so they can move on to next one. It really waters down the reviews and trying to assess a source. The people who have been around long enough can see but anyone new really trying to feel out a source I feel sorry for. It is hard to really find a well written review describing everything.
I could burn up 8 reviews pretty quickly with just one cycle. Can't get everything from one source because lets face, some products are better from some sources than others and no point in consolidating gear from only one source if it is inferior to another's.
Hypothetical cut cycle (or is it):
Test from source 1
DHB from Source 2
HGH from Source 3
IGF from source 4
Trying out some new IGF for shits and giggles from Source 5
Adrol from source 6
Injectable SD source 7
albuterol Source 8
ECA stack Source 9
S4 (andarine) Source 10
HCG Source 11
TNE source 12
Injectable mtren Source 13
Nolva/PCT meds Source 14
cialis/viagra/dapoxotine Source 15
Now we could add in some mast and tren from Source 16
Some Halo for that final week Source 17
Maybe some peps Source 18
all of these compounds can be evaluated independent of one another I believe for the most part especially if they are ran at different times during the cycle and some are just so unique you know it has to be that compound. Kind of an extreme example but it can add up pretty quickly. And that is only 1 cycle. What about running two or three a year. I think some of these compounds can logically be bought from the same source to help consolidate things like the GH and IGF, if one is good the other should probably be also, but sourcing the best of all those products is going to involve a lot of sources.
What I would really love to see is someone put that cycle together on all promos. I am sure it could be done.
Now we are talking a real whore.
That is what is happening. I coined them to be "Frankenstein cycles" A complete abuse of promos and their intent. You might as well plan dining out at Costco, using the free food sample kiosks as your buffet court.
My understanding (and I'm frequently wrong), is that the limit is on source reviews, there is a section for compound reviews that may or may not have a limit on it (I haven't seen one enforced anyway), but that could always change with abuse. It seems to be a game that is played between the Mod(s) and the promo whores.
As for using multiple sources, there is a guy a page back who wrote 75 reviews for 38 sources over a multi year period. Do you really think he totally trusts all 38 sources?? If I give a good review to a source, in away I'm attaching my endorsement to that source and to me my word means something.
38 sources. Must not have been happy with many of them to keep jumping from source to source so I would expect a lot negative reviews. If not, pretty sketchy then. Find a few good sources that have what you need and stick with them. Nice to try a new source every once in awhile because there are some hidden gems and sources come and go and flip like a switch from good to bad all the time.
No, I think all his reviews were positive for the sources,...... it's hard to get in on the next promo if you post negative reviews. ROFLAO
Exactly!
RustyhookerIm seeing the folks with 8 in a very short time are getting spanked. Sering guys with 5 in 2 mo etc all promos
The Mod's discretion can cover a lot of territory, but 5 reviews in a 2 month stay here will raise eyebrows pretty quickly, along with whoring for more promos on top of it, reminds me of swine at a feed trough.
There are times when whoring is so blatant that they don't get to 8.
Being in more than one free promo at a time (essentially 1per cycle) is approaching whore status in my book. Try something free from a new source or a different product line from one of your old sources and use it in your cycle, great. Using a promo every once in a while to be rewarded for being a good customer, great. Hopping into a bunch of promos just so you don't have to buy anything for your cycles, whore to me even if it won't be at 8 reviews. Then all 10 star reviews just so you can get more.
AnonBeen some 7's all for promos and/or sources that pay store credit for good reviews from accounts only a few months old. And they didn't get to keep their karma. I saw it.
Anon8 reviews in less than 12 months
https://www.eroids.com/users/press1
LMFAO
Is this page your little safe place Twinkie
As you seem to be losing your memory as badly as your mental health state, you stated this about 5 times in the past 6 months. In fact you said this just before the temporary ban you got for carrying on then too.
AnonThis is the first time your name has been posted here. You are at 8 reviews in a rolling year.
"Eight is the limit. A very generous one at that. 10 is a "hard limit". (At a mods discretion)"
-Greg
Take it up with @Greg or @BFG.
He's at the limit. Last review was in October of last year. Going to let this slide.
AnonUnderstood.
They have known I have been at 8 reviews for months, you have continually pointed this out.
So you start an argument with me which you must have been planning over the course of the day, you begin losing the argument as you always do so your only thing to do is try to get my karma wiped which you are obviously so envious of as its all you ever come out with.
AnonYour name finally got posted here and you were called out for upvoting a review that did not meet review standards today. Take it up with the Mod or Admin.
Anon8 reviews for 7 sources in about half a year.
https://www.eroids.com/users/muaythaiguasian
And he just posted a gear pic and a review and rating for a source that does not even carry the brand he reviewed. On 2021-11-25 he reviewed another source for a brand of gear they do not carry too. So he's a blatant liar and whore. His reviews and ratings should all be removed since they're obviously fake.
Glad to see you're digging deeper than just numbers,.......... keep it up, well done.
Detective Shred is on the case!
Rustyhookerhttps://www.eroids.com/users/steaknlobsterlikeamobster
Just posted another review and his tag says owes 2 more. 13 reviews
Shred tagged him near the bottom of this page, I commented on his giving reviews on gear received 3 years ago.
RustyhookerI know. Check the convo on his last review. And check the note by bfg on the site. And he still posted review with middle finger up. Lol
AnonHe owes reviews. So I figured Mod or Admin are handling this in a way so that he is still able to post his owed reviews. It's also at their discretion to evaluate and judge reviews. Greg said this:
"Eight is the limit. A very generous one at that. 10 is a "hard limit". (At a mods discretion)
Understanding there are always exceptions to the rule, I reserve the right to look at contributing factors like age of account, one off products, excessive promo use, days between reviews, number of concurrent sources reviewed per cycle, etc."
Not to take away from your post , but to add to it:
Greg added in a different post:
Anon9 reviews for 9 different sources in under 6 months.
https://www.eroids.com/users/decahead
I would like to suggest his name be changed from decahead to dickhead.
I negged him on his last review; made claims without ANY proof.
Or, considering it's DECA,........ dickLESShead.
Rustyhookerhttps://www.eroids.com/users/yukon-jack
I stopped at 19?
Its okay !!! He blamed it on the
ALCOHOL
Do you think he spoke to the wrong big Greg?
I think those who control the buttons have been aware of look a like name for about 10 years, I remember when some want-a-be tried out the handle "Tread-N" instead of the well known Tread-M, i didn't last long, To quote Hollywood "that ain't going to happen". So, if a username caused confusion with a leadership name (ie: Admin, Mod, Guru or maybe Pro), said new user would be given a new name of their own choosing or one would be chosen for them.
Anon8 reviews. Just missed 9 reviews by 2 days. And owes a review.
https://www.eroids.com/users/gamejiachex
Anon6 reviews in under 6 months and owes 2 reviews, maybe more. We all know where this is headed...8 or more reviews in a rolling year very soon.
https://www.eroids.com/users/goldo
Im sorry if you dont like my reviews but Im honest with all of them. I’m taking avantage of the promotion but I use the product and give my honest feedback
Your reviews are fucking horrible and should be flagged for lack of detail. If sources are gonna send you free gear at least put in the time and effort to write a proper review.