tomjones's picture
tomjones
  • 0
1713

professional members?

ad

I have noticed members getting bashed for negative reviews which is fucking disgusting.

Then these negative reviews are always followed by a great review with bloods ect. First off its quite easy to create a bloods doc. Second if you look at these guys with bloods the are only friends with mods and sources. It's quite obvious not everyone is being truthful. Do yourselves a favor and Google the source followed by scam or real or fake. You will see all the shit they did on other boards. Some sources here have been banned from other boards for under dosing and straight fakes.

MODS YOU SHOUD NOT ALWLAYS SIDE WITH SOURCES. NOT A GOOD LOOK. I KNOW YOU BAN SOURCES BUT THAT'S AFTER THEY GO MIA.

J Bol's picture

Wonder why TJ got banned???

CBBurrr's picture

I've always been quick to defend the rep of eroids, and call bullshit when people claim that bad reviews get deleted.
I stumbled across a SRC review page a couple days ago that appears to have just that scenario.
A couple of reviews that did not receive orders, negged into hidden status.
Comments, including 2 of my own in the SI flagged and hidden.

I've PM'ed a couple of mods about the situation, no reply and no change on the pages.
I'm not gonna jump to conclusions, but I sure wish mods would make it clear why they are hiding bad reviews and critical comments. If they are fake accounts leaving reviews, please say so. It sure looks like eroids is protecting a source.

Catalyst's picture

Mods don't hide it, if they wanted to do that its a couple of clicks on a mouse button. What happens is once it gets to a certain number, (I think it's minus 4), the software hides it as chances are it's likely to lack value to the community. Not an exact science, especially when it's fanboy bullshit.

CBBurrr's picture

What about comment in the SI's
Can anyone with an ADV tag hide those?

Catalyst's picture

Yep.

One would hope that with the adv tag cones a sense of responsibility. Unfortubately not always the case.

CBBurrr's picture

FR sent.

aneas's picture

Wow, you're clearly very new to this.. Here's a beginners hint: "other boards" rarely give ringing endorsements of their competitor forums or the top sources within. It ruins their reason to exist. Have a nice day.

madman's picture

R.I.P

Greg's picture

I think if you actually spent a few days reading the reviews you'll find that is not the case.

And, as this is a site where sources rise up the ranks by the members themselves, you'll probably find those at the top have fewer bad reviews than those at the bottom.

If you've been around, you'll also know that the mods were members themselves. When a new mod is needed it is the members that suggest mod candidates.

Unlike other sponsored sites, which make a living discrediting competitors, eroids is a "grassroots" based site where we encourage the members suggest rules, and police themselves. Unfortunately, there seems to be a lot more snakes in the grass these days. Perhaps you're one of them?

Green Ranger's picture

lol bro thanks to eroids community and my due diligence I've minimized my chances of getting ripped off. There is no place like home!

NoWeakAces's picture

Now you're spreading this shit in the SI's? Guess you weren't getting enough attention here or from your other post entitled, "mods!"

irongame427's picture

And a lot of souces on other boards have been banned on eroids for scamming people. If they haven't fucked our members there good in our book. And that goes for the sources we banned but are stil on other boards. They obviously haven't been fucking people on those other boards. So that's it. If a source fucks a bunch of people they will get banned from here.