Codeman253's picture
Codeman253
  • 336
380

+ 6 Science based "optimal" training vs bro splits

ad

How much does your training split/style even matter? I really like just hammering one body part a day, but it seems like the new craze is higher frequency lower volume, aka push pull legs or an upper lower hybrid split. There's also the endless debate of volume vs intensity. I feel like diet and recovery is way more important than training, but I don't want to leave gains on the table. Thoughts? I want to hear from some of you mass monsters on here.

BertAK-47's picture

PPL. Every other day. I learned with my body type that rest and food matter most. I used to try to hit everything twice a week and I wasn’t growing. I started resting more and all my lifts started going up. I train way fucking harder cuz I’m well rested. Which has been giving me way more gains. I’m no mass monster… yet. I think the only thing that matters is intensity, rest, and food. However the fuck that looks for you.

In a promo × 1
locknid's picture

PPL is where its at for me too. I tried all sorts of splits through the years but I always end up going back to some sort of PPL. Right now its PPLU, Mon - Push, Tues - Pull, Wed - off, Thurs - Legs, Fri - Upper.

BertAK-47's picture

I think body types matter majorly when it comes to best split for people. What works for some might not work for others. That’s part of this journey. Learn to become a machine.

In a promo × 1
Petecastiglione's picture

Intensity builds muscle. Do every set and rep with intent. Do the split you enjoy most.

With that said, recovery and nutrition is just as important. I don’t think anything can be considered optimal, because everyone responds differently. I’m a a HIT guy, but my calves only grew hitting them 3-4 times a week. I don’t believe anything is really that black and white. Where there is a study this week, there is another the next contradicting it. The only truth lies in what works for you and you alone.

In a promo × 1
Codeman253's picture

Thanks big dog I was hoping you'd see this

In a promo × 1
Gotem69's picture

Yeah its honestly individual based something we all know many top pros from the older era to today's bodybuilders used varying training methods and grew to become freaks so it comes down to intensity and the other factors pete has mentioned.

Owes a Review × 1
Pandateston's picture

100%, Big bro. Couldn’t agree more !

In a promo × 1
TeaBody's picture

“Where there is a study this week, there is another the next contradicting it”

Isn’t that the true.. well said

In a promo × 3
TeaBody's picture

All good stuff here… lots of variations in answers and to be honest, none of them are wrong.

I’ve always wanted to know if the “trick the muscles “ thing was true… for example) Push day, start with heavy flys instead of the standard bench.

In a promo × 3
Tanman's picture
shredski's picture

For me all that matters is I show up and put my all into. But I’m just like you I over think shit and want to “optimize” everything. But I’ve fucked with all different splits throughout the years but what I always fall back on is the typical bro split. Idk if it does anything but I like to “trick” my muscles and I’ll do 3 weeks same routine then switch it up and run that 3 weeks and within those 3 weeks some days I’ll go super heavy low rep others lighter weight higher reps but I almost always go until failure. I feel like what really matters is sleep and that’s the part I shit the bed on but hard as fuck when u got kids running around and waking up at 2am

In a promo × 2
Khandum's picture

Same I’ve tried every split you can think of, but always end up going back to a variation of a bro split. I get the best gains from it. I always trick my muscles up with swapping one machine or exercise for another one, and I’ll run it that way for a month or two before going back to my tried and true routine. This way the workout never gets stale. I also incorporate the same as you said, days where you go heavy with less reps, and days with lighter weight more reps. Every set to absolute failure. Each body part gets between 10-16 sets a week, this is recoverable volume for me, anything beyond that and I start to become hindered.

In a promo × 3
Khandum's picture

Same I’ve tried every split you can think of, but always end up going back to a variation of a bro split. I get the best gains from it. I always trick my muscles up with swapping one machine or exercise for another one, and I’ll run it that way for a month or two before going back to my tried and true routine. This way the workout never gets stale. I also incorporate the same as you said, days where you go heavy with less reps, and days with lighter weight more reps. Every set to absolute failure. Each body part gets between 10-16 sets a week, this is recoverable volume for me, anything beyond that and I start to become hindered.

In a promo × 3
BigCoachKen's picture

Just to answer your first question, your split only matters if its what you enjoy and will keep you motivated to push each and every workout. Bro split, just destroying one muscle group once per week still checks that box for me.

I wouldnt have such an issue with the science based community if it wasnt being touted by broccoli head retards sportin arms with less girth than my wiener.

Petecastiglione's picture

@BigCoachKen this is the answer ^

In a promo × 1
5percent4life's picture

Science based nattys are a cancer to the industry. Im glad their king nipptard blocked and got a temporary op on me lmao.

In a promo × 2
Cypher2377's picture

I just recently, ( last 3-4 weeks) changed over to push, pull, legs, and to be honest, I haven’t noticed any gains or losses. I’m gonna ride it out another couple weeks and evaluate the results. I’m an old head so it’s been hard to change up what’s always seemed to work for me, but I’m giving it an old college try.

In a promo × 1
Tanman's picture

Man at the end of the day doing what you enjoy and doing it consistently is the best bet. I was heavy weights low rep guy most of my younger years because I enjoyed the fuck out of it. I almost passed out, threw up, and shit my pants the day I hit my all time 1RM on deadlift and it was one of the best moments in my life lmao.

I'd probably still train that way if my joints could handle it, but at 38 they let me know real quick that I can't roll like that anymore. I do a higher frequency with moderate weights and moderate volume these days. But i track my lifts and progressive overload with autistic levels of dedication these days, so even not going all out balls to the wall like I used to my progress is better now than it was back then when I was lifting super heavy but only vaguely tracking my progression. Consistency always wins.

Bodhi's picture

This debate has existed since the first guy picked up a barbell. Is it 6 reps to failure or 12? PPL, bro split, upper/lower, or full body? HIIT or Zone 2? Low carb or high carb?

Hell, remember John Cisna, the science teacher who lost weight eating nothing but McDonald’s to prove calories in vs. calories out?

Everyone wants to optimize the last 5%, but almost nobody has mastered the first 95%: showing up consistently, training with intensity, progressively overloading, recovering well, and eating for their goal.

There aren’t any shortcuts. The best split is the one you’ll execute relentlessly for the next five years.

Codeman253's picture

I'm such an over thinker though. If all variables are the same what routine is going to build the most muscle? We'll never know lol. I'm 100% locked in but this shit still keeps me up at night lol

In a promo × 1
SeeOhShow's picture

A shitty split done consistently will yield substantially better results than bouncing around all different kinds of splits trying to find the perfect one. End of the day nothing, absolutely nothing, beats consistency. That goes for your diet, training, recovery methods, and anything else in life. Do what you enjoy but do it consistently

randomdude's picture

The best and most optimal split is the one you enjoy.

In a promo × 1
sandman3698's picture

I like hitting thing twice a week but I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually matter. Consistency, recovery and hitting them good is what I think matters most.

In a promo × 2
Novalentinehere's picture

I’ve been battling this too. Some of these new training styles are so foreign, they just don’t make sense to me. But then when we were running VCRs at home, DVD players were space technology. Maybe that’s just the way it goes

In a promo × 2
Levijeansnmore's picture

Just wondering what would these newer styles of training be ? Probably foreign to me as well

randomdude's picture

I’m not even sure it’s still popular but RPE always seemed so weird to me. Never had an interest in trying it.

In a promo × 1
press1's picture

RPE tends to be used more for Strength based lifting mate to make sure you aren't constantly burning out your CNS and joints - whilst still being able to get stronger and being able to recover for the next session.

Training to failure you can do a lot more in Bodybuilding as it lends itself better to muscle hypertrophy, increasing muscle mass and getting a better pump etc

I don't buy all this bollocks in terms of how much you can talk after your set in terms of breathlessness as sessions can feel different to each other - I think Reps in Reserve is a better measure such as 2 reps in reserve.

randomdude's picture

I just prefer percentage based programs for strength. They just make more sense to me. Just like RPE I can still make adjustments on feel. That’s just me though.

You might be surprised to learn I train like a powerlifter and strongman (even though I’m far from being one lol). Some oly variants. Never really got into the bodybuilding style of training.

In a promo × 1
Codeman253's picture

100% agreed, Im too fucking dumb for that shit, just train harder than last time.

In a promo × 1