HailRazor's picture
HailRazor
  • 580
1315

HGH M/W "Fisher's" 22,145 Da (research GH)

ad

(Research Purposes Only. Not for therapeutic use)

(Looks like this sample has the additional Methionine Residue)

rhGH (22,125 Da for THERAPEUTIC use)

JUST A COUPLE LINKS:

I think this one got good reviews and elevated IGF-1

22,256 Da (AKA Red Welts)

http://www.eroids.com/sites/default/files/gearpic/15336/Report_Somatropi...

Fake JINTROPIN MS Results

22,147.5 Da

http://www.eroids.com/sites/default/files/gearpic/21800/7.PNG

BE SAFE

killroy's picture

So you are saying there are other rhgh variants out there ? And unless it has the exact dalton of pharma its research and may or will not perform as seros or nords ?

Owes a Review × 1 In a promo × 1
HailRazor's picture

Yea....but M/W is just one thing. The "structure" or protein sequence plays a big part in therapeutic properties and Therapeutic Protein Immunogenicity. This was from reading FDA/Pharmacodynamic studies.
So the GH Serum testing would be looking for 20kDa+ and 22kDa+ (I'm assuming)
So that test is pointless IMO (for counterfeit GH)
These one time IGF-1 high scores wouldn't show 191aa either.
So that test is pointless IMO (for counterfeit GH)
Insulin Growth Factor Binding Proteins would show "therapeutic" properties. (Bio identical)
But before I start arguing this point....I'm waiting on more info

I was able to elevate my IGF-1 by 182ng/mL with one SubQ injection not using BBing Forum protocol.
Baseline IGF-1 (125ng/mL)
After one SubQ injection (307ng/mL)

So I'm leaning towards FDA/Pharmacodynamics as a better way of testing the 'analyte' (GHish Chinese Product)

dudebro's picture

yeah i never understood that purity rating. wtf good is 99% purity if it's not even the real deal? makes no sense at all.

HailRazor's picture

Pure recombinant for research purposes? I just never understood comparing that M/W to justify a good product. M/W is just the tip of it from my understanding. But, lots of unusual side effects lately. Highest IGF-1 wins right? Or was that IGFBP-3? Hmmm