posted Sun, 02/08/2015 - 12:52
1730
If a steroid is slow to start is it slow to shut down?
ad
If a long ester steroid takes longer to get working does it take longer to shut you down?
I'm keen to keep cycle as short as possible to ease recovery but also I want to maximise gains.. For instance could you run a cycle like this:
1-16 Boldenone Undecylenate - 600mg PW
10-19 Test P - 525mg PW
It already sounds stupid as I read it back but I thought it was worth asking.. If a steroid is slow to start is it slow to shut down?
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
I think you should of added yes with certain drugs. I know ive read 100mgs of deca is enough to shut your system down for up to 30days, and this happens with the first shot. altho im sure this will depend on the individual as most things do. could be wrong tho. good thoughts growmore.
I heard that about deca also but I've never seen proof to back it up.
Yes and yes. The steroid, when attached to a long ester, takes longer to achieve a concentration in your blood stream that would start the suppression of natural testosterone production than would the same compound bound to a shorter ester.
But, we are only talking perhaps a matter of a week or two and using a longer ester is not a way of avoiding shut down. You want the blood plasma level of the long ester to rise to a level in your blood where it can be effective and by the time this happens the process by which your own natural production of testosterone gets suppressed will already be underway.
So you're saying it would be benifical to run EQ 2/3 weeks before test if you were keen to keep cycles as short as possible but get the most out of the compound safely?
A week or 2 can be the difference between a easy recovery and a harsh one.
Thanks for the answe GH, good to see you're still helping as always.
Honestly I'm a huge fan of short cycle i might get flamed for this but i love testp cycles, my body reacts and fires on all cylinder Very well to this compound and when i say short cycle i mean 6 to 8 wks.. Recover is a lot easier on my body but yet i will still take few months off extra after it just to make sure my body is ready for another burst run.
No one will flame you for saying that bro. I've never ran a cycle less then 10 weeks but my experience of the contrast between a 10 and a 18 week (my longest) concerning recovery was dramatic, as you would imagine. So now I'm keen to keep cycles as short as possible. Saying that I'm also keen to try EQ.. I may look into the cyp version or even try running it 4 weeks before my test P.
I always feel as tho ppl who say they don't recover well after a long cycle is because they havnt come down properly, if you were blasting for 18 weeks what was ur high point and how long of a time frame did you pyramid down before your pct? I think some ppl plan these cycles out and look at a sheet of paper and what ppl told them instead of listening to your body and extending the pre set time to let your body adjust.
12 week tren cycle followed by cruising on 300 test a week for 6 weeks.
Recovery was a nightmare.. But I did recover. Lesson learnt.
Boom!
Well the ideas is that it will take a long time to completely leave your system,I guess a simple example would be if using test E you would not want to start pct in one week you would want to give it at least 2 weeks for it to work out of your system obviously you know this I am saying it is pretty much the same concept across the board.Disclaimer popped 2 vicodin so I may have worded it like a retard bare with me
This is the only time I have no clue what you're saying brother !
Yeah My mind is a little more cloudier than expected bro my apologies LoL
Forgive you this one time ;)