This is another one of my crazy ideas that are floating around in my head. What i've tried to do here is to make the standard Test/EQ (Undecylenate ester) more effective by incorporating another ester variants of the same Boldenone compound, namely Boldenone Acetate. So rather than waiting multiple weeks for the Undecylenate ester to kick in, why not have an immediate effect with the use of the Boldenone Acetate.

Obviusly you need some form of Test in EVERY cycle, so í've tried to replicate the same idea with Testosterone Propionate which will be followed up by Testosterone Enanthate and if you wanted to, im sure you could include the Testosterone Deconate into the mix.

The method below of front-loading the EQ for 2 weeks will make sure that you hit a peak in EQ levels around week 3, as opposed to week 5/6 resulting from a 1 week front-load.

Here's one ways you can front-load your EQ:

Consider the half life of EQ for instance. 14 days.

If you would do this normally at... lets say 600/wk then after 2 weeks without any injection you would have 800 ish half life residue + 600 (injection) = 1400mg in your blood. This is what is actually effective on your receptors. It is slow releasing. In theory frontloading the amount you would normally have at the week that the substance is supposed to "kick in" will have it kicking in right away.

For the EQ you may do 1200mg for week 1 and resume normal dosing for the rest of the cycle if you're doing a 12 wk cycle. If you're planning a shorter one then preload EQ a bit more, but I wouldn't consider doing a 8 week cycle on EQ alone. (See: http://www.eroids.com/cycle_logs/eq-exploration-a-different-viewpoint)

Also, have a look at this thread, i found it very useful: http://www.eroids.com/forum/steroids-qa/steroid-cycles/front-loading-vs....

A front load of EQ for 2 weeks will see your levels reach 1800 by week 3 and remain at this dose consistently. This option is definitely the best, although you don't peak as high, you reach your peak by week 3, and then that peak is maintained throughout the rest of the cycle. So this way is clearly the best option for running an eq ace + eq und cycle.

By front-loading EQ for 2 weeks results in peak levels by week 3. If you run EQ cyp alongside this, it is unnecessary since you have the same compound in your body twice (since both estered variants of the same compound) are in your system. However what i would recommend is an EQ ace and EQ undecylenate cycle, where you are front-loading with the EQ ace in the period in which it takes for the undecylenate ester to kick in.

Also, for a front-load of the undecylenate ester, you have the option of running it for 12 weeks (for example) since it 'gets to work', in this case from week 3-12, and with an EQ ace kicker, you have the EQ compound in your system from weeks 1-12 (aka. the whole cycle period).
However, you do have another option, which is to run an EQ ace and EQ cyp cycle, in much the same format as a test prop and test e cycle. A 12 weeker will be sufficient in this case, and the cyp ester will be valuable in this case too.

To conclude, to get the best value for your money when running multiple EQ esters is to either use an EQ ace + EQ cyp cycle OR to run an EQ ace + EQ undecylenate (front-loaded for 2 weeks) cycle. They can both be ran for 12 weeks and I am definitely considering this for my next cycle.

This is a prototype, whereby the AI, hCG and PCT and Testosterone dosages are irrelevant in this case...

...What i'm looking for is your opinions on this cycle layout, making effective use of all the esters available on today's AAS market while maintaining a cycle which is as efficient as possible.

ALL opinions are welcomed