VikingMuscle's picture
VikingMuscle
  • 1
2114

-1 Tapering off cycle vs coming straight off

ad

Hey everyone, haven’t seen a post on this yet, But I’m sure it’s been talked about before. Was curious what the general communities thoughts are for those who blast/cruise or cycle/trt, when coming off your cycle do you find you retain your gains better tapering down on test a couple weeks post whatever extra compounds your running. Example 12weeks deca300/test500, then after 2 weeks post deca keeping test at 500, beginning to taper down like 500,400,300,200 week by week. or would you say it’s better coming straight off deca then immediately dropping test from 500 down to the trt dose.

Kayles420's picture

Same as Eagles said below! I have always tapered with short esters. If using test e I will wait one week and then start my test prop taper. If using Deca or even Tren, stop that shit probably about three weeks before you're going to stop your test. Taper down with NPP or Tren a. I have always found the transition into PCT to be so much more smooth when I taper with short esters because they leave your body much quicker and the PCT meds are not fighting the long Esters anymore. Just a personal experience from many years of use. But every single person is different. Also must keep that in mind

Eagles 2013's picture

I do prefer to taper as well, however I always taper with short esters. For example, if I was blasting on test-E and deca for 16 weeks I would taper off with test prop and NPP.

johnmarshall12's picture

I'm into tapering off gradually. I think you hold more gains that way and it is less of a shock to your system.

VikingMuscle's picture

Yeah that’s what I’m thinking too, like yeah the longer the cycle the longer it may take to recover. However such a harsh drop from a blast to trt dose is bound to decrease some muscle tissue regardless how on point diet and training is. Theoretically a decrease over a few weeks should allow the body to adapt slowly. May just have to push out the next run a month or so. But if you retain better gains from the previous cycle, I wouldn’t be racing to jump into another one so fast. Which ultimately is the goal to run as few cycles possible while simultaneously gaining and keeping the tissue. All fun thoughts into this.

BJ's picture

My personal PCT seems easier when I slowly taper down the old school way & don't do super long blast cycles! Trial & error

VikingMuscle's picture

True that!

VikingMuscle's picture

Great info, I like swapping out the longer esters right before a show, never considered it for a potential taper down. Really like that idea, thanks!

Bearded_muscle's picture

This is going to be very individual as the idea of TRT runs the gamut, from 70 mgs to 300 or more.

I have a prescription for 200 but I only use about 100 off cycle, that’s the amount I need to stay in range and not need any AI. Coming off I want to get cleared out ASAP. The quicker I clear out and go completely off, the quicker I feel comfortable getting back on. I haven’t noticed any loss off cycle. You’ll lose some of the “look” (veins, density, fullness) but the actual muscle has always stayed.

If I tapered down I’d have to extend my time off by however long I was tapering. If you’re going off, GO OFF. Get clean, clear, and your next run will be that much better for it.

Look at mrcoolbeans. He goes off everything at 270lbs plus not even trt and he holds his size because he works just as hard and diets perfectly when off.

Bulkdaddy's picture

Depends on genetics too big guy... +1

Owes a Review × 2
VikingMuscle's picture

Awesome, love the thought behind this. I suppose extending out the taper time and depending how bloods look it just takes even longer before jumping back into the game. Thanks for the reply.