posted Thu, 04/11/2013 - 19:59
841
What would you do?
ad
Well, I've been pondering this for some time, but now I'd like to hear your opinions on this. Here's the scenario (I call it a scenario as this is purely hypothetical). Lets say a bro has a total of 2000 mg dbol. Would that bro be better of running 40 mg for 50 days or would it be better at 50 mg for 40 days? Whatever the consensus is, I would assume that translates to other orals whether its a kick start or a finisher. My own opinion would be take the lower dose longer as it gives you more gym time with that compound in your system, I mean after all in the end you're still putting the same 2 g of dbol in your system. Or maybe I'm totally of base here and it doesn't matter one way or the other.
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
lower dose longer
30mg for 6-8 weeks is better than 50mg 4 weeks, hands down
That's what I was thinking. I know a lot of dudes that have the mentality of more mg=more strength=more gains. These are also the same type of guys that use Nolva as an AI and think pct is for morons. I try to lay some knowledge on them but they're set in their ways. Alas I digress, can I assume lower dosed orals run for a longer time is to cut down on sides and to solidify the gains?
yeah at 50mg my back pumps are painful and I have bloating, high BP, and can't wait to be off the dbol.
That's why people do 4 weeks.
When on 25-35mg you'd be surprised how comfortable your body is side free and can use much longer.
AnonFor sure! I don't go past 4-6wks anymore.But 30mg is plenty and limits the water that comes with dbol. 30mg daily is my happy spot.