posted Tue, 07/03/2012 - 06:12
2464
Deca or Tren?
ad
Deca or Tren?
34 years old. 6’1” @ 215lbs”. My goal is to reach the 240-260lbs mark. I have long arms and legs so I think this target weight will look good for my frame. I like the wrestler look (stone cold, goldberg in their hay day)…thick yolk, big neck, taps, broad shoulders. I’ve got several cycles under my belt. I’ve never ran Tren. So my question is should I continue to run test/deca cycle this winter shooting to become closer to my goal size then run tren this spring or go ahead and give tren a try. I have ppl who say deca is better and some say tren is better. Deca is better for mass and tren for strength. I know everyone reacts differently but I would like some more experienced input. Thanks.
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
I was in the same boat and I have mostly always run test/deca cycles but this last cycle I did was a test/tren/mast/var cycle. When I am trying to put on weight and ONLY build size and weight, then I always run test/deca/dbol(or drol). I hadn't run tren in a long time though and I wanted to switch it up. I have put as much as 39 lbs on with a test deca cycle but the last cycle i did (test/tren) I only put on about 19 lbs but it is a VERY solid 19 lbs. I am very happy i leaned out and ran this tren cycle, but as you were asking, I am going for bulk again next cycle so it will more than likely be the test deca. The only other thing I am considering is test e/eq/tren e.
if you want mass go with the Deca. Tren will harden you up and def build some mass but you will be better off with the Deca for sides and its just more comfortable. Like Irish said, DIET IS KEY!!!!! Its been said a million times, but seems most people dont get it. I spend 10 times on food than I do on gear. Good Luck!!!
AnonHow many cyclex you got under ylur belt already? Tren ahould be like after ten cycles under belt. Deca is better imo opinion too npp and deca have gains that are more keepable than tren . Tren gives big strength and etc but gains are less keepable is what I read