All ratios are given in terms of anabolic nature first to androgenic nature second.

Anadrol 50: 7.11:1

Anavar: 13.42-26.25:1

Androil: 1:1

Andropen 275: 1:1

Deca-Durabolin: 3.38:1

Dianabol:

Upper bound: 2.25-5.25:1

Lower bound: 1.5-3.5:1

Equipoise: 2:1

Halotestin: 2.24:1

Masteron: 2.48:1

NPP: 3.38:1

Omnadren: 1:1

Oral Turnibol: Given 100:0 Undefined. Infinitely anabolic to androgenic

Parabolan (Tren): 1:1

Primobolan:

Upper bound: 2:1

Lower bound: 1.54:1

Proviron:

Upper bound: 3.33-5:1

Lower bound: 2.25-3.75:1

Sustanon 250: 1:1

Testosterone Cyp, Enanthate, Prop, Suspension: 1:1

Winstrol: 10.67:1

1-Testosterone: 2:1

MENT(Methylnortestosterone Acetate): 3.54:1

Methyl-1-Testosterone:

Upper bound: 9.1-16:1

Lower bound: 4.14-7.27:1

Cheque Drops(Mibolerone) 2.28:1

Original Data : http://www.eroids.com/forum/steroids-qa/anabolic-steroids/anabolicandrog...

A lot of you seem to assume that a higher anabolic number means a higher anabolic rating. These numbers to my knowledge are the ratios and not the strength ratings of the compounds. Even then I doubt some of these numbers as every single compound was at least as anabolic or in most cases way more anabolic than androgenic.

This list was to make it easier to compare compounds in terms of RATIOS. This does not rate the strength of the compound, but merely how anabolic the substance is compared to how androgenic it is.

If someone can cite somewhere that says the original data is in terms of actual relative strength of the compound I'll edit in integrating factors so you can see strength of compounds as well, however I don't even believe these numbers are correct let alone that they are truly a measure of strength of the compound. Especially since a lot of those numbers said that many compounds were much much stronger than Tren, and the fact that strength is also dose dependent.