posted Sun, 12/14/2014 - 19:13
842
confused
ad
Im really confused... what's all this talk about the generic gh were getting is just peps? A few months ago people were praising blacktops and now there junk? Is there any proof behind this claim of generic gh being peps? If not id like to hear the reasoning behind it. If the Chinese found a way to mimic gh with peps, I dont think we will ever get generic gh that is real hgh again.
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
RageMonkeyTheres a whole thread on it in the peptide section
A few members detail how it could theoretically be done using a combo of ghrh ghrp and hgh frag
HGH 176-191?
Everyone has been relying on only elevated IGF-1 to confirm the legitimacy of their imported "HGH".
Standard protocol by the FDA /PD/PK is a combination of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 to test the 'analyte' or rhGH being administered for its 'effectiveness'
Lower or Higher IGF-1 levels set by pharmacodynamics would raise a 'red flag'
Most of the 'Imported HGH' would be stamped 'Research Purpose Only' by FDA standards.
lol cause we all finally had enough time to run them and came to the conclusion they're junk.