Cypher2377's picture
Cypher2377
  • 459
995

+ 1 Pre Cooked or Post cooked weight

ad

Got a question, for the past couple months I’ve been dialing in my calorie intake, keeping up with macros religiously but have always weighed my positions after cooked, now I’m learning that it’s recommended to do this raw weight/portions . What’s your thought, opinions?

randomdude's picture

Post weight for meat personally. Happy to get extra macros and nutrients from meat. Shouldn’t be a huge difference in calorie content.

Raw weight is technically what the nutrition label goes off of. But then how are you supposed to parse the amount of fat that drips off when cooking? What about the extra amount of calories burned from your body processing the food? There’s many variables. Don’t overthink it.

As mentioned below anything that absorbs water or any liquid to cook should be pre cooked weight.

In a promo × 1
smurfdude1234567's picture

We all know you LOVE getting those extra macros and nutrients from “meat” Wink

Owes a Review × 1
randomdude's picture

I want it in and around my mouth.

In a promo × 1
Jameshobbis's picture

Strictly pre cooked to many variables weighing post cooked always been the best and easiest way for me. Also nearly all items with macro breakdowns on are pre cooked macros so easier for me to manage iv done this for the last 12 years and never done me wrong. When I want to grow I grow when I want to get shredded I get shredded

In a promo × 1
wanted's picture

My 16 oz 96% ground beef turns into 13 oz after cooked. Scummers ripping me off

liverpool_96's picture

pre cooked because you may put more water in for example and that can affect cooked weight. or fry chicken a bit longer so it loses water thus loses weight.

In a promo × 2
JohnnyHardGuy's picture

Always weigh my food cooked just before consumption.

In a promo × 2
SeeOhShow's picture

If it’s something with water weight you want to weigh precooked. Post-cooked rice and meat weights can vary drastically depending on how long you cooked it (for meat and water evaporating) or how much water you added for things like rice and pasta (that absorb water)

This can lead to inconsistent calorie density with your foods. 100g medium rare steak is less calories than 100g well done simply because there’s more actual meat in the over cooked one that’s had all the water evaporated out.

Cypher2377's picture

Should have specified more, I usually only measure meat, since I don’t eat carbs, starches etc. but I know say for chicken and beef, the weight drastically changes from raw to cooked. Been carnivore for almost a year, so I only eat meat and eggs, on an occasion maybe 1 -2 a month some cheese

BigDdaddy's picture

Why the carnivore diet brother? Carbs are an amazing source of energy as well as gaining muscle mass when timed properly.

Owes a Review × 1 In a promo × 2
Cypher2377's picture

I use to be a carb freak, but honestly, now I’ve never felt better. Took a minute for me to get fat adjusted, my energy from fat instead of carbs. But I have great energy, no bloating or spikes in blood sugar, for me, it’s just an easier, healthier way of eating. Some would argue and that’s all good, I have a shit ton of energy, blood pressure and all that shit is spot on

BigDdaddy's picture

Well, if it's working for you and you feel great that's honestly what matters most. Keep killin it then bro!

Owes a Review × 1 In a promo × 2
SeeOhShow's picture

I have ocd. I even take out the scale to weigh out a glass of milk to drink. When I make rice I weigh out the water and rice lol. It’s not fun being me sometimes

BigDdaddy's picture

Lmao I'm ocd as well, but you've got me beat there bro!

Owes a Review × 1 In a promo × 2
SeeOhShow's picture

Gotcha. I will say it gets to the point of doing it so long that I’ll eyeball things then weigh it and I’m always within +/- 5g. So in theory I could do your method. But I love repeatability, so all my recipes are weight based. And damn sure when I bake I always weigh every ingredient vs using cups/tbsp/tsp

Zdaa8794's picture

Always pre. Nutrition values for any food is as packaged. So unless you’re buying something pre cooked with a label. Then it’s always raw. Assuming you’re following the package label and not logging a cooked food value from a tracking app. Try the difference yourself. Weigh out 100g cooked rice and 100g dry.

JohnnyHardGuy's picture

Do you eat raw uncooked rice? Do you eat raw chicken?
Would it not make more sense to weigh the food you are going to eat once it is prepared?
Just something to think about.

In a promo × 2
Zdaa8794's picture

The package label is listed as dry. 100g cooked is far less than 100g dry. Thus less calories than you think you’re eating.

Zdaa8794's picture

I would say it’s neither right or wrong. It’s how accurate someone wants to be. You have no way of knowing how much water is in the rice or how much evaporated out of it. In turn you now have an inaccurate measurement of actual calorie value of the set amount of rice because you don’t know what’s rice weight and what’s water weight.

Aggieguy's picture

Hell no skip all of that all you need to do is pull up to McDonalds and they have food ready to go.

In a promo × 1
Massa Ron's picture

I do cooked weight for white rice and dry precooked weight for almost everything else.

In a promo × 1
Cypher2377's picture

I’ve always done cooked weight, hell, maybe I have been doing something right after all--

BigBobby's picture

I do weight everything pre cook, so if I'm making food for someone else I can separate it

In a promo × 2
Khandum's picture

This is the only way, idk what these other guys are on lol

BigDdaddy's picture

True statement lol

Owes a Review × 1 In a promo × 2
HogCranker3000's picture

Same, this is the way.

In a promo × 2