I am a bit confused about the sources scoring system used on eroids.com. I'd be grateful if someone could explain to me how the scoring works. There seems to be some inconsistencies.

For example, if you look at the current HGH & Peptide source reviews here: https://www.eroids.com/reviews/hgh-sources , the top HGH & Peptide sources have a score of typically around 80 or 90, but then most of the rest of the sources are scored at zero.

Yet some of the sources with a zero score have many pages of mostly good reviews ("I recommend shopping here!") with only a few bad reviews ("I DO NOT recommend shopping here!").

For example: stenlabs.com has mostly good reviews, and one or two bad reviews, but is given a score of zero (see: https://www.eroids.com/reviews/stenlabs.com ).

By contrast, evolutionpeptides.com has quite a few bad reviews, but is given a high score of 85 (see: https://www.eroids.com/reviews/evolutionpeptides.com ).

Also, can I ask, why is the scoring system quite extreme: the top sources that are scored in the 80s or 90s, but then most other sources are scored at zero. Surely you would expect a more even range of scores: if a source is excellent, then it might be scored as 80 or 90; if source is just average, then you might expect a score of say 50 to 70; and if the source was low quality, you might expect a score of say 20 to 40.

In other words, you would normally expect an even range of scores, rather than a system where the score is mostly either in the 80s or 90s, or otherwise zero. So I'd just like to understand why the scoring system quite extreme, and why there are so many sources with zero score.

Also, on a different subject, why is peptidesciences.com no longer listed in the HGH & Peptide sources? If you look at the reviews for peptidesciences.com here: https://www.eroids.com/reviews/peptidesciences.com , you see that the reviews are good, but this source is not listed at all on the HGH & Peptide sources page.

Peptidesciences.com were listed a few months ago with a good score of 86 (see the April 2016 archive of the HGH & Peptide sources webpage on the Wayback Archive, where peptidesciences.com was listed: http://wayback.archive.org/web/20160430160656/https://www.eroids.com/rev... ).

But now peptidesciences.com seems to have disappeared from the HGH & Peptide sources list.

Anyway, if someone could explain to me how the scoring system works, I'd be very grateful.

Myself, I have come to eroids.com looking for a reliable supplier of somatropin, either Hygetropin or Jintropin (which I need for medical reasons, rather than bodybuilding). Eroids.com is a great review website, and I am very grateful for it. Eroids.com I think is the only website which user-reviews peptide, HGH and steroid suppliers, and helps people avoid the scam and low quality suppliers.