XvBeast's picture
XvBeast
  • 322
8396

+ 4 Promos are bad for the voting system?

ad

i hate to be the one to bring this up..i wanted to ask ur opinion on something, a wise man named Greg brought something to my attention.. Do you think that promos such as the ones that require ppl to vote first on previous orders encourage members to lie and write fake reviews inorder to get free stuff. also do u think that promos that give members free stuff in exchange for votes are biased, and that members might be inclined to give that source a 10 instead of an 8 because they got free stuff... just my observation ... im just seeing excellent sources at the bottom of the board while others who may not be as good (in my opinion) are rising to the top 15

i am not saying any sources here are trying to cheat, but rather us members might be screwing up and some sort of regulation should be considered. honesty should be the number one requirement of this site

youngtricep98's picture

But you didn't run both labs at the same time did you?

XvBeast's picture

easy guys this is simply about promos and reviews.. not an argument about how find bunk gear, although i do see both of ur points . while destructos is 100% correct, u could add the exception that if i am a new guy (1st cycle) running test e (long ester) for 6 weeks and switched over to another test e for another 4 weeks, i may not know the difference until week 8, if at all. its possible that this has happened before.

youngtricep98's picture

I'm talking about running the compounds at the same time!!!! Not spaced bro. The reviewers are running two labs with the same compound AT THE SAME TIME. Your not gunna be able to tell which lab is doing the job.

BigJ-roll's picture

I think he is talking about all the guys that have been getting free packs from all these new shops and then reviewing and voting!

youngtricep98's picture

This is what I'm saying. But they are running gear from another source as well, same compounds.

BigJ-roll's picture

Yeah I mentioned it the other night!!! Your right!!!

youngtricep98's picture

Glad you get what I'm saying bro lol

BigJ-roll's picture

It's easy bro 4 new shops open and send all this gear and all of a sudden they review for all of them!! Oh well good on them I guess for getting what they can get when they can get it!! Not hating! Just something I noticed I'm retired young and on here all the time like all day!! Lol

BigJ-roll's picture

Rusty! You sure!!!?? Lol

youngtricep98's picture

Where did I say deca?

youngtricep98's picture

Samplers are getting short esters. Example aphis gear. Go look at the guys reviewing his gear. Then go look at the other sources threads they post on stating they are running their gear too. Same compounds. Don't get all pissed off bro. Your getting worked up over nothing.

Pale's picture

Sure there is potential for it to be abused, but it also is a way for sources to drum up new business. To ban it altogether I believe would not be very fair to them. I cannot help but think that this is more of an issue for ownership to decide, not us.

XvBeast's picture

ok Again... I didnt say we should ban it, but regulate it. and sure its up to BFG to decide what is right or wrong , its his site, im simply bringing it up

Pale's picture

Yea, my bad. After reading the rest of the posts it appears that maybe this is a little more serious than I had noticed. You guys have been here and seen this for far longer than I .

XvBeast's picture

no problem bro, i understand

Greg's picture

Just for the record, I once was offered free gear for a review. I told the source that I would disclose the fact that I got free gear and that it would be an honest review backed up with blood work (I figured I can afford to pay for blood work if he was paying for the cycle). The source accepted the terms and set me the gear. There were no strings attached and I was free to write the review as I saw fit. I let others know the gear was free so they can determine for themselves if I was being Biased. I posted my review 6 weeks after I started my cycle. I see no problem with this type of open promotion.

What I would have a problem with is a nervous newer member talking up a source in hopes that a "selective scammer" wouldn't scam him.

And I have a problem with a source that wants to advance in the ranks to sell more gear using "bought votes". These sources would worry me as they would be the ones to suddenly disappear when the shit hit the fan as people started realizing that a top rated source wasn't all that he appeared.

I think a post like this is a good vehicle to remind us why we came to eroids and stayed.

We don't work for the source. This is not a sponsored site. We are here for each other, and depend on each other to rate a source honestly. The only way this site works if that integrity stays intact.

alloneword's picture

X2, bloods separate results from rhetoric.

XvBeast's picture

excatly 100% what im saying, it almost feels like lobbyists and the congress

XvBeast's picture

well there are actually only a few ppl who i would trust on here when it comes to reviews mainly for my purposes. people who been around for a while w/ high karma such as tread. but say for someone who is new, who they gunna trust...they are going to read up and decide based on what the majority of ppl are saying, high karma or low karma. they dont know anyone

Pale's picture

XV, I know I spent a couple weeks going thru reviews looking at sources and actually attempted to order from another top ten before I settled on the one I have used. No problems. I have not received any free gear or taken advantage of any promos.

I really do not believe most noobs are even aware of the free gear or very understanding of promo's. We look around the site, we look at pics and cycle logs, we look at many source websites and read reviews before finally making an order. At least that is what I did.

aronl's picture

If you got free/promo drugs and they weren't good, why would you be reluctant to say so for fear of not getting a discount for more bunk crap??

XvBeast's picture

thats not the point. read the whole thread

dandog's picture

Like Beast said, these guys are asking for a positive review THEN they will send you the Promo. Its basically buying a vote. People that are short on cash may decide they wouldn't mind getting some free gear.

XvBeast's picture

While u might be an honest person brother, others might not. there is a promo right now to review first before getting the stuff. and sure if the gear sucks , im sure members will say so, why would anyone give a good rating to something that is bunk. but if the gear is good quality but not excellent, do u think that a member might be inclined to give that source an excellent rating instead of good.

im not saying we should shut promos down, just simply suggesting some sort of regulation or rules that is all. and ur right its about to get interesting, i think im about to get gang banged but its just how i feel and i couldnt help myself.. just simply asking for ppls opinions thats all

dandog's picture

Its buying votes and that's not cool. It would be cool if they would give the promo either way but then again if you think about it, if I don't like a source I'm not going to give a damn about any gear they send me that's extra. So I think it shouldn't be allowed at all.