Generator's picture
Generator
  • 166
3093

Welts

ad

There is always talk of welts in those choosing to use HGH. There are many questions surrounding the topic and even more answers, some valid, most are based in hysteria. You've heard them all before I'm sure. When 3 people post up comments of welts on an SI, inevitably the topic of 192 ensues and someone who read something on some other forum will overreact and start shouting about 191 vs. 192. It's shit, get a refund, hold this source accountable. Here is a link to some information you may find helpful, maybe not

http://dermnetnz.mobify.me/reactions/urticaria.html
Urticaria is widely known in the medical field and comes with a litany of precursors: solar, physical, chronic, acute, my personal favorite is Dermographism. This link will show you a small sample of how the epidermis can react in a variety of urticaria. Perhaps some research will help you from getting caught up in hysteria and wild accusations of fraud. While this in no way ensures the quality of any UG product, it does give room for a discussion.

Finishstrong's picture

I have many welts, many. I don't think it necessarily means it is bunk. In my case, I think it was too many pins in same area too frequently. First, I try not use the same site for a few days. I pin as many different locations as possible. When I go back to same site, I space at least 2 inches from previous.

Generator's picture

Good call.

Generator's picture

Nor have I, but I've only gotten a welts one or two times on all the generics I've run. We know that generics aren't pharmaceutical quality, but does a welt mean it's bunk, only SIMEC knows, and until that comes in, I don't see a reason to jump the gun.

DBG's picture

yup. its def a huge issue with generics right now...I think cuz of inferior quality

DBG's picture

marked for further investigation Smile
Thanks guys

DfromPhilly's picture

Thanks to everyone for your contributions. Learning a shit ton.

Generator's picture

Awesome information as always, thank you guys. I'll read up on this, hope everyone else does the same.

HailRazor's picture

Can I elaborate ? Smile

I'll just wait for another time

Maybe start with this:

http://www.pharmacypracticenews.com/download/SR1229_WM.pdf

Understanding GH (it's not an actual Generic Med)

RELATED PROTEINS TEST
(European Pharmacopoeia 6.0%)
(Cheap Generics can be higher %)

DIMMER AND RELATED SUBSTANCES (Higher Molecular Mass)
(European Pharmacopoeia 4.0%)
(Cheap Generics can be higher %)

Dimmer and related substances of higher molecular mass: rhGh aggregates that coexist with normal rhGh. They don't have biological activity and cause antibody of rhGh. The antibody combines to rhGh molecule. The antibody prevents the rhGh from combining to it's receptor to stimulate growth, cause the biological activity of rhGh to decrease .

N-TERMINAL ANALYSIS
(Met-hGh)

BACTERIA ENDOTOXIN TEST
(Possible Welt Issue also)

HailRazor's picture

I think "Generic" is the big misconception

Understanding BioSimilars, BioIdenticals, Follow-On

Also try:

http://www.drcranton.com/hrt/hgh_body_of_evidence.htm

( Generics, Immune Response , Welts, etc)

GENERATOR's right also. Could be a number of issues.....BUT.....with such a large amount of complaints.....well.....I'll stick with ole trusty Dr. Lei

Generator's picture

I totally agree, the partial dilemma, for me anyway, is the spuratic nature of it. Some have a reaction while others don't. My girlfriend gets welts from one brand while I don't. I've heard people talk about getting welts and then not. What I hope to see is an end to the unsubstantiated claim of 192 vs 191. Killer info as usual man, thanks.

HailRazor's picture

And that's the thing....the info you posted is one of the potential issues, no doubt.

That's why I hadn't said much....but lots of complaints.....so...I'd rather just see what the Lab Test results say

Generator's picture

Exactly !

HailRazor's picture
HailRazor's picture

BILL ROBERTS:

Redness and Swelling in Response to GH Injection?

Redness and swelling should not occur at a growth hormone injection site. That said, with legitimate, sterile GH a very small percentage of injections will go wrong in some unknown way, temporarily causing these effects. A reason for this could be the needle picking up some skin bacteria in the injection process, despite good procedure. If the redness or swelling subsides, a single such event should cause no suspicion of the product.

If it’s a known-good product yet such responses occur twice in a row, the vial should be discarded. It may have become contaminated.

If it’s a product which is new to you and unproven, then the most likely explanation is that it is a cheap, 192 amino acid product which no one should use. Continued use could result in developing immune response not only to the bad product, but to genuine GH as well.

Not sure if doing IM inject instead if SubQ is the safe answer :(

Generator's picture

There is no direct link to welts and Hgh. The point is that there are a myriad of factors surrounding welts, which include pressure, cold, allergic reactions to drugs and pressure, it doesn't mean the hgh is bunk, though I'm sure some are.

Generator's picture

It should be there now.