+ 1 Fake reviews and deals with sources
Can a MOD please look at my latest review and tell me what on earth I did wrong, how any of what I said constituted "taboo topics" that EVERY OTHER review on that particular page didn't also have.
Once I've been told what I did wrong i'd like to be sent a copy of the review so I can post an amended version if a mod will be kind enough to do so.
Sorry for the trouble, but i'm determined to get this review up,
EDIT AFTER BEING TOLD WHY IT WAS FLAGGED:
This is unbelievable. EVERY SINGLE review on the page for this particular source discusses the exact same thing which my review got flagged for as "taboo" ....95% of those reviews are OBVIOUSLY fake, there are dozens of them on the first page which has pushed the real (often negative review) past the first page. ALL these reviews share something in common, they are all positive, mine is negative.
It is obvious that eroids is NOT impartial, I have seen this going on before, some mods obviously have arrangements going on with some sources to keep negative reviews off their page. With all the talk of karma whoring and what should be done, this serious issue is not getting addressed. I'm sure i'll be negged for this and. this thread will probably be closed immediately and the issue silenced. I wonder if any mods will actually step up and address the issue.
- Bookmark
- 1
- 0
day two.. thread still open..
no negs ......
AnonIts obvious we have a sacrifice for odin..
Ya know, the more I think about it, the more I realize what a dick head thing this is to say. You are not only talking with zero knowledge of actual fact, but you're really going to use words like OBVIOUSLY? Congratulations! You have succeeded in showing everyone just how insignificant an issue you bring to the table. Coupled with your arrogance and lack of respect or thirst for the truth, I think I can nominate you for Ed's group with a clear conscience
It's obviously obvious no? Now, how do I get to Bold my font?!
Also, does this mean cyanide cycle reviews are officially off limits? :(
For serious though, I initially believed this would have been a nice learning experience once he was informed of the error... Boy was I wrong. Some people get so butthurt for no reason, and pretend like airing the private matter in public on the forum is ever going to solve shit. When has that ever worked? This issue is private and should have been handled privately the entire way through.
It's obvious x 2
star text star = text
star star text star star = text
I obviously missed that obvious scheme. Thank you, obviously.
Ok, now you're obviously being condescending obviously. Obviously its upsetting me.
This is all becoming very inobvious to me and I am obviously confused as to the obviousness of the situation!
As a side note, regarding reviews, would it be possible to have a page pop up before the reviews stating the guidelines and the no-no's of reviews? Would that even make a difference in the reviews and avoid threads like this?
Obviously yes, Because one is in place already.
Maybe if BFG has some time he can review and update the notice.
Thank-you for bringing this situation to light. Sometimes things can go by unnoticed, (I know not as exciting as the obvious conspiracy theory you concocted).
I've edited the Taboo thread to include reviews of deadly compounds to be forbidden as well.
My bad, I thought people had more sense than that.
https://www.eroids.com/forum/general/general-talk/eroids-taboo-topics
Please let me know if there is any thing else I can do to address the issue.
-Greg
RustyhookerYou will never be allowed to post on narcotic, dnp, slin, etc....taboos. unless you want eroids to be invaded like Silk Road...Google it!
Here's your problem and answers.
https://www.eroids.com/forum/general/general-talk/how-to-post-a-review-f...
And as for this, your true answer is in front of your face, just a few clicks away. The mod trainees are extremely aggressive (as they should be) with shittycahcah reviews. There is an absolute ZERO tolerance policy for crap reviews. I'll show you what I mean in a min. But your answer, you already covered it. DNP is NOT a review we want posted. It isn't a compound we want discussed and since this is a private website, it is our prerogative to allow what we wish. DNP is a dangerous , foolish compound to use. Only the elite among us should entertain it and most don't fall in that category as most are not being paid to do this. The accusations,...i'm so sick and tired of hearing bullshit about conspiracies. Wahh wahhh, the mods blah blah, cmon bro! Do you know how we do things? Are you really that arrogant that you think you are the exception to the rule? Shit!! That old song is tired as hell.
Thank you the conspiracy shit is getting old that is all you hear lately
Hi Nikon, I'm sorry you feel this way...when I saw this happen this morning I had to research it a little myself...bc most of what you say is at least partially true! Let me first start by saying get real if you think any of us have prearranged deals...with regards to this particular src none of us need DNP we (the mods) are all perfectly capable of adjusting our diets to loose weight without resorting to such exetreme measures!
As far as why your review was taken down and others are still up is this is a newer rule (see post taboo subjects) unfortunately a few "challenged" individuals can ruin things for the whole group sometimes! When we implement new rules sometimes they take a while to go into effect and we don't always apply them retroactively as that would tick a lot of people off...
I will however look into the reviews on that page and see if something needs to be done.
-ToT
As do I. Doeth thou even hoist?
More like Doeth he even diet?
I'm guessing from what you wrote you reviewed DNP. Perhaps the mods have decided they no longer want DNP mentioned on the site, which considering what the compound is wouldn't be a bad idea to be honest.
I don't know, just hypothesising. You're jumping to huge conclusions and making some pretty wild accusations. Adding 2 and 2 and potentially coming up with anything other than 4.
hmm that is kinda strange... every review on that source is a taboo topic like you said.
You may notice they all follow a similar format and are written by users with 1 karma and have no profile, Fake reviews.
yeah i don't think there's any deals with sources or anything like that but yeah maybe some fake reviews slipped by the mods. there were less mods around here back when those reviews were made so not as many reviews were getting flagged. not sure why yours was removed and those weren't though.
Yes i certainly can. PM incoming