Anonymous's picture
Anonymous
  • 0
7107

+ 8 Sciroxx Aromadex trouble

ad

Unfortunately I must warn the community about some problems I ran in to with Sciroxx aromasin.

They call it Aromadex and its dosed at 25 mg per pill, with 100 pills per pack . The batch number on my pack was 4537 . I had gotten this, Providex and Clenodex from Texxgears who I believe was an authorized distributor of Sciroxx, a name I thought I did not need to worry about.

Early June I began using 12.5 mg ED of the Aromadex, July 13 I had blood taken and on July 16 I got my number of 92.7 on Estradiol . I had been feeling kind of flat and my libido wasnt what I expected, plus my strength seemed off. When I got this blood work I decided to double my dose and take a full 25 mg ED , did that until August 8th when I got blood taken , the results for that last test show me now at 130.9 Estradiol , so I think its safe to say the product is garbage, which is where its going in the last pic, and I now have my answer as to why I felt this way. I have switched my brand of AI and will retest again in 1 month.

Ordered from: 
Sciroxx's picture

I'm not sure why everyone is just eating everything that it written here without actually reading the article ?!

the Estradiol suppression on plasma levels was found to be 32 percent !

This is confirmed as well on this much more - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14671195 which is also quoted on this article by megaT883.

what is more embarrassing is that MegaT883 who brought this article doesn't know to read either - the PEAK suppression was found to be 12 hours after administration (72 percents) but the average suppression under daily administration is 30-40 percents, which may also clearly explains the blood levels under so high testosterone serum levels

MegaT883's picture

That is incorrect. Quoted from the study :The PK properties of the 25-mg dose showed the highest exemestane concentrations 1 h after administration, indicating rapid absorption. The terminal half-life was 8.9 h. Maximal estradiol suppression of 62 ± 14% was observed at 12 h. The drug was well tolerated. In conclusion, exemestane is a potent aromatase inhibitor in men and an alternative to the choice of available inhibitors.
I'm embarresed for Karl you see what he is stating is incorrect. This is what he is leaving out.."At the end of the 10 day study blood was draw 24 hrs later after the last dose and estradiol was at 38%." This is the exact quote from the long version : There were 38%, 71%, and 45% decreases in estradiol, estrone, and estrone sulfate concentrations, respectively, after 10 d, approximately 24 h after administration of the last dose of 25 mg exemestane, This makes sense since the half life is right at 9hrs and max suppresion is 62% is reached at 12 hr. It then drops to 38% at the 24hr mark.
This product did very little to suppress estradiol.I'm wondering if it was even Aromasin.There was another study done "The Effects of Injected Testosterone Dose and Age on the Conversion of Testosterone to Estradiol and Dihydrotestosterone in Young and Older Men" It shows how much testosterone converts to estradiol.Noviceass is closer to the Young age group at 43. This graph shows that estradiol was never over 100 in the up to 35yr olds even at 3500ng/dl of Testosterone. So no Karl it's your product. Fifty-one young (aged 19–35 yr) and 52 older (aged 59–75 yr) men were in the study. This was estradiol levels without an AI being given.
http://jcem.endojournals.org/content/88/12/5951.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2913038/figure/F2/

Sciroxx's picture

Well science based - if the test level are a DOZEN times higher then normal then you may expect 1.5 higher estradiol levels then normal

MegaT883's picture
Sciroxx's picture

I'm responsible on the quality we release, not to one individual results under certain circumstances. Estradiol serum levels is quite intrigue issue. it's determined by many factors and it's quite difficult to learn from it conclusively on AI, especially when the one who posted these results is a fanboy of other source as everyone knows

What amazes me is that you got from me one product, you appreciated the quality, and I find u posting on any honest comment I put here after 5 minutes with such passion against Sciroxx,

should we wonder ?

B52-BODY's picture

Karl. Saying things like hurts only you in the long run. The way you express your opinion ,
instead of saying - I'll look into why you got a mislabeled product to start with, and Ill find out why my product comes up short in your test. You accuse and then say something smart assed about the person who bothered to take the time to have your product tested. Instead of you going out and posting test's on your own.This in its self doesn't make you and your company look good...just a thought.

MegaT883's picture

For those interested here is the complete study and I quote"The maximal suppression evoked by exemestane at the single dose of 25 mg in the present study was similar to published results in postmenopausal women, but the time course differed (24). Evans et al. (24) reported that a single 25-mg oral dose of exemestane maximally suppressed estradiol concentrations by 72% 3 d after administration, and estradiol levels returned to baseline only 8–11 d after drug administration. In the present study maximal suppression of estradiol of 62% was observed 12 h after exemestane administration and returned to baseline 3–6 d after administration.
http://jcem.endojournals.org/content/88/12/5951.long

MegaT883's picture

No problem Noviceaas . Just want to make you aware of another study "Effects of Injected Testosterone Dose and Age on the Conversion of Testosterone to Estradiol and Dihydrotestosterone in Young and Older Men". Basically the study shows that 19-35yr olds (11men) (since your 42 I would pay more attention to the younger numbers and add a few points)and 59-75yr olds (7men) the max estradiol converted on 600mg of Pharma Test E (Delatestryl) that was given for 20wks. With this info you can get a fair idea of where your estradiol levels will fall with the dose you used. Pay particular attention to figure1 and Figure2 of the study.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2913038/

FinMan's picture

Selling shitty AI's are the single most screwed up thing you can do to somebody.... I guess it doesn't matter if your gear is bunk too... Who needs an AI with Wesson oil ? +1 novice. Good job.

Darktide's picture

These labs are the single greatest benefit to the user here. If you are interested in knowing what is working and what is not. Thank you for this! +2

Beaker's picture

Wait a minute...... Hold the boat.... karlx is NOT going to draw his own blood and run a lab in Germany? And then vomit his swill here calling him a liar.... and bullshit artist? Oh, and wait... start a PM campaign to "back door" this user? Where is the justice? Where is the equity? See.. I had nothing to do with this... so apparently it means nothing.... This proves the point that he is crazier than a shit house rat....
Stupid in.... stupid out... nuff said.

HailRazor's picture

Oooooooh! Lol

j223's picture

I have the same problem. I'm not prone to gyno and my body is good at hiding bloat so another indicator I usually dont notice.

But if I start tearing up while watching tv I KNOW my estrogen is high! LoL

Elluckyluciano's picture

x2. Awww yea. Gotta give us hard working mofos what we paying for now. Lab tests are awesome on here.

sarmanti's picture

100% with you. I can accept some fake oils, don't get me wrong.. I'll be pissed, but in the end I'll accept it and move on. But fake AI or any other ancillaries is the biggest dick-move in this business.

sarmanti's picture

What AI are you now on?

dooduu2's picture

figures

Doss's picture

agreed.. 25 ED is a good idea, but i wouldn't do it for 2 weeks. maybe 4-5 days, then drop back to 12.5 ED. watch for sides and readjust if needed. 92 is high, but it's not so high that an aggressive protocol is needed. if the asin Karl gave is some bullshit, then a good asin would/should knock it back into range at 12.5 ED for a couple weeks, possibly less. could always drop the test dose back for a couple weeks to help catch up quicker.

Sciroxx's picture

This product got straight from my lab if the delivery was done on ?March

I sent FR to get to the root of it.

I asked Texxgears to contact me about 2 weeks ago about these issues, and I still ask him to contact me

With what other products you combined the Aromasin ? before and after the tests.

Other products arrived with this Aromasin - I'll appreciate of you post your feedback or lab tests on them

ReadyToKillIt's picture

Novi, you're a true diplomat. I just don't think I could be so understanding in a situation like this.

Sciroxx's picture

As a note - the Estradiol levels matches the high test levels, and I'll specify -

Pls read this article - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14671195 - Pharmacokinetics and dose finding of a potent aromatase inhibitor, aromasin (exemestane), in young males.

As you may learn there a dosage of 25mg of exemstane decreased Estradiol levels by 38 percents (and 50mg with 32 percents - anyhow it shows that an effective dosage of exemstane will decrease estradiol by 30-40 percents - there is statistically discrepencies as the clinical test was done on only 12 patients - if it would have done on 12,000 patients we would get much more accurate number between 30-40 percents). So as expected the Exemestane wouldn't decrease Estradiol levels by 98 percents or so as one may expect:) it's not formulated like this, and such outcome is certainly not welcome (without getting into the clinical effect of dropping that significantly the estradiol levels) - so if you expected while taking testosterone on superpharmacological levels to keep estradiol levels below 50 or even 100 with exemestane you were absolutely wrong,

Pls contact me - despite the fact that I don't even know you If there is any problem from any kind I'll always back up what I manufactured.

K

MegaT883's picture

The 32% is misleading as that reading was taken 24hrs after the last dose.If you would have posted the complete study it would show that a single 25mg dose suppressed estradiol 62%"In the present study maximal suppression of estradiol of 62% was observed 12 h after exemestane administration and returned to baseline 3–6 d after administration." So it suppresses estradiol by 62% 12hrs after administration. For those who would like to verify what I'm saying is true I'll provide the link to the complete study scroll down 3/4 page to the header that says Discussion and read what is written 3rd paragraph.
http://jcem.endojournals.org/content/88/12/5951.long

manbearpig's picture

You are so full of shit. You sold a bad product. Admit it.

MegaT883's picture

Yes he is

ReadyToKillIt's picture

Are you fucking kidding me. Flat out, blood test after blood test have shown that estrogen levels can be kept in normal ranges provided the ai used is properly dosed. They can even be crushed down to virtually zero. You're a jack ass scammer. You should be booted from here, or at the very least be given a troll tag. Your products are inferior and should be avoided.

Sciroxx's picture

Check my references to real science - with such high serum test levels thiese estradiol levels should be expected. this customer got 100 tabs - send 2 tabs to a real lab test.

I agree that estradiol levels may be reduced even to normal range, but you can't and should expect at serum test of ~6000 to get it, unless you do make some trial and error with higher level of or properly combination of anti estrogens.

in this case I assume thatt he product arrived from me, and very hard to fake any tabs anyhow so I take full responsibility, you may consider me as a jack ass scammer, but I back up the quality he got.

username97's picture

You don't use your own Test Cyp?

MONK's picture

Dammm.. lol.. all faith is officially lost. Now waiting for my homie Mint opening on Monday so I can salvage my cycle from the shitter. Thanks for posting this Novi , peeps need to know.

In a promo × 1