posted Tue, 07/30/2013 - 19:53
735
Short steroid cycles?
ad
I've been doing some research on running short cycles (as short as 2 weeks) as opposed to long cycles (10-16+ weeks). I believe 2 weeks is pushing it but 4-6 weeks doesn't seem like a bad idea considering shorter time off and possibly less clo/nol doses and shorter lengths of pct maybe? I've read 2 forums on this topic that were very, very helpful but I trust you guys much more!
Please respond!
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
We love shorties !!
Not a bad idea, but at the same time, 4-6 weeks would result in complete shutdown usually. If you're already shutdown, then why not continue to 12 weeks? Hell, 16 weeks? If avoiding shutdown and regaining natural levels is your goal, then 2-3 weeks would be the most your body could take of exogenous testosterone. Throw in a kicker, and you're completely shut down.
Only reason we run pct at 12 weeks is because pros < cons. After 12 weeks, that is.
From what I've read yes, you are shut down but recovery at that point is supposedly a ton easier. Something to do with how well LH reacts when only shut down for short periods. Thank you for the input. Hopefully someone can post the links to the forums I read, they were great. My cellphone is superduper homo as is the word "superduper". Damn I'm tired. 1:25am. Night freaks!