godbiolab.is
payment method --bitcoin (prior),paypal, bank transfer
HPLC report :
HGH lab analysis
www.eroids.com/pics/godtropin-hplc-test-with-dimmer-by-god-biolab
www.eroids.com/pics/godtropin-hplc-test-report-from-janoshik
www.eroids.com/pics/lab-analysis-on-godtropin
www.eroids.com/pics/godtropin-hgh-analysis-0
www.eroids.com/pics/godtropin-hgh-analysis
www.eroids.com/pics/godtropin-puretropin
www.eroids.com/pics/godtropin-gh-analysis
Retatrutide analysis
www.eroids.com/pics/test-report-of-retatrutide-from-god-biolab
Tirzepatide analysis
www.eroids.com/pics/test-report-of-tirzepatide-from-god-biolab
Semaglutide analysis
www.eroids.com/pics/test-report-of-semaglutide-from-god-bio-lab
TB-500/BPC-157 analysis
www.eroids.com/pics/tb-500bpc-157-test-report-from-god-biolab
HCG analysis
www.eroids.com/pics/test-report-of-hcg-from-god-biolab
daily IGF1 and gh serum analyse on godtropin
https://www.eroids.com/pics/godtropin-igf1gh-serum
recent IGF1 test
www.eroids.com/pics/godtropin-blood-test
www.eroids.com/pics/igf1-on-godtropin
www.eroids.com/pics/mid-cycle-blood-test-godtropin
www.eroids.com/pics/an%C3%A1lisis-de-sangre-gh-e-igf1-godtropin240
www.eroids.com/pics/blood-test-ghigf1
www.eroids.com/pics/gh-serum-test-on-godtropin
www.eroids.com/pics/blood-test-ghigf1
www.eroids.com/pics/godtropin-240iu-blood-tests
www.eroids.com/pics/godtropin-bloodwork
www.eroids.com/pics/godt240-godtropin-vs-iron-lion-labs-orange-tops-10-i...
www.eroids.com/pics/good-igf1-test-on-godtropin
www.eroids.com/pics/latest-igf-labs-from-godt
www.eroids.com/pics/igf-1
a complete guide on hgh
www.eroids.com/forum/hgh-peptides/rhgh/complete-info-guide-on-hgh
I agree completely man. I’m hoping the results speak for themeselves because the price is great and I have seen multiple good reviews as well.
I’m only 2 vials in and I have 3 kits so hopefully they come. Nothing against you guys or godt.
I don't take it personally.
Your experience will dictate (at least it should) what you will use and what you won't.
If your not progressing you have to change things.
Just like if something is working...don't.
Godtropin has a good rep? Only on this site. Every other board this crap is a joke. Known for red welts and little to no effect. This is when people like myself and others that went from pharma to this notice it’s crap right away.
https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/godtropin-vs-meditrope.13438...
Go ahead and look on more roid boards. Mention godtropin. People will literally laugh at you.
What works for some may not for others.
Constant experimentation and research is needed to learn what works for the individual.
I could give a crap about what anyone on any board would have to say or if they laughed at me for doing something that is working very well for me.
Most on boards barely have a chance at creating a worthy beach body much less a championship physique to compete or turn pro.
To each their own.
Oh ok, I haven't seen the bad bloods
How long takes delivery to Europe countries?
months or several months?
Thank you
Bro's can someone tell me why i get really hungry after pinning a larger then normal routine dose? I am upping the use of this great stuff normally i do like 2iu twice a day and now 3.3 iu but after like 30 min i get really hungry all day!
Thanks
I also noticed hunger, more like if I'm having low blood sugar after pin GH and crave sweets like a fat ass. I can't control my self. I'm just being a fat ass.
Received packet pretty fast. This is my 3rd time ordering from him just found it weird on how fast it dissolved when I put bac water. Other batches I had to wait almost 30mins for it to fully disolve.
Funny how if you only use one product, that’s what you’re used to and you think that’s the “standard”
But actually real/pure hgh SHOULD dissolve within seconds.
Poor quality gh with a bunch of fillers take long to dissolve....so you’re complaining about something that is a good thing..,,
ClassyChassisThere are always "fillers" in a stable pharmaceutical preparation. Here is an example of one such formula and the reasons for the various components
a) hGH
b) Glycine
c) Mannitol
d) Buffer
wherein the molar ratio of hGH:glycine is 1:50-200, advantageously 1:75-125, and the molar ratio of hGH:mannitol is 1:700-3000, advantageously 1:800-1500. In a preferred embodiment the buffer is a phosphate buffer and the molar ratio of hGH:phosphate buffer is 1:50-250, advantageously 1:75-150. In another embodiment a non-ionic surfactant is added to the formulation. Advantageously polysorbate 80 is used, and the molar ratio of hGH:polysorbate 80 is 1:0.07.30, advantageously 1:0-1.10.
In a preferred embodiment, the formulation of the subject invention comprises the following components at pH 7.4:
______________________________________ Quantity per ml uponIngredient reconstitution (mg) Molar Ratio______________________________________r-hGH 1.0 1Glycine 0.34 100Mannitol 9.0 1100 NaH2 PO4.H2 O 0.18 110Na2 HPO4.12H2 O 1.32Polysorbate 80 0.20 3______________________________________
In general, the formulations of the subject invention may contain other components in amounts preferably not detracting from the preparation of stable forms and in amounts suitable for effective, safe pharmaceutical administration.
Suitable pH ranges, adjusted with buffer, for the preparation of the formulations hereof are from about 4 to about 8, advantageously about 6 to about 8, most advantageously 7.4. The formulation pH should be less than 7.5 to reduce deamidation (see FIG. 1). pH values below 7.0 result in particulate formation upon lyophilization (see FIG. 2). The aggregation is not related to deamidation.
Storage of lyophilized r.hGH at 40 and 60° C. resulted in increased formation of a trailing peak by HPLC. This peak increased with lower pH values (see FIGS. 3 and 4). Consequently pH 7.4 is an advantageous pH.
The molar ratio of hGH:glycine is 1:50-200, advantageously 1:75-125, most advantageously 1:100. Glycine greatly inhibits dimer formation when it is added in these ratios. Ratios of 1:10 and 1:1000 result is substantial dimer formation upon lyophilization. Glycine, which is a nonessential amino acid, has the formula NH2CH2 COOH. In addition to glycine, an amino acid such as alanine or derivatives of such amino acids are used in the subject formulation.
The molar ratio of hGH:mannitol is 1:700-2000, advantageously 1:800-1500, and most advantageously 1:1100. A formulation containing mannitol as the sole bulking agent, results in greater aggregate and dimer formation than one containing a mixture of mannitol and glycine. As an alternative to mannitol, other sugars or sugar alcohols are used such as sucrose, maltose, fructose, lactose and the like.
The preferred buffer is a phosphate buffer and the molar ratio of hGH:phosphate buffer is 1:50-250, advantageously 1:75-150, most advantageously 1:110. A buffer concentration greater than or equal to 2.5mM and less than 20mM is preferred, most advantageously 5-10mM (see FIG. 5). In this concentration range of buffer, minimal aggregation occurs. Advantageously a sodium phosphate or tris buffer is used.
The effect of using a mannitol-glycine mixture as the lyophilization bulking matrix is compared with using either mannitol alone, or glycine alone in FIGS. 6 and 7. All samples were buffered with 5 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. These figures are plots of the influence of bulking matrix on the formation of dimer over time, at a storage temperature of 40° C.
FIG. 6 demonstrates that a molar ratio of hGH:glycine:mannitol of 1:100:1100 results in the formation of less dimer upon storage, than either mannitol alone or glycine alone.
The importance of the molar ratio of hGH to glycine is shown in FIG. 7, wherein the hGH:mannitol molar ratio is fixed at 1:1100, and the hGH:glycine molar ratio is varied from 1:10, 1:100, 1:1000. The least amount of dimer forms in the sample which has an hGH:glycine molar ratio of 1:100. More dimer is formed in the other two cases.
The formulation of the subject invention may optionally include one of several types of non-ionic surfactants, such as the polysorbates (e.g. polysorbate 20, 80, etc.) and the poloxamers (e.g. poloxamer 188). When polysorbate 80 is used the molar ratio of hGH:polysorbate 80 is 1:0.07-30, advantageously 1:0.1.10, and most advantageously 1:3. On a weight to volume basis, polysorbate 80 is added in amounts of about 0.001 to about 2% (w/v), in order to enhance further the stability of the hGH. Polysorbate 80, in concentrations above 0.01% (w/v) reduces the amount of aggregation forming upon lyophilization. In addition to improved shelf life, the surfactant containing formulation of the subject invention inhibits the formation of protein aggregates when the reconstituted formulation is shaken.
Other pharmaceutically acceptable excipients well known to those skilled in the art may also form a part of the subject compositions. These include, for example, various bulking agents, additional buffering agents, chelating agents, antioxidants, preservatives, cosolvents, and the like., specific examples of these could include, trimethylamine salts ("Tris buffer"), and disodium edetate. In one embodiment, no proteins other than hGH are part of the formulation.
In a further embodiment of this invention, the use of nonionic surfactants permits the formulation to be exposed to shear and surface stresses without causing denaturation of the protein. Further, such surfactant containing formulations, may be employed in aerosol devices such as those used in a pulmonary dosing, and needleless jet injector guns.
In order to prevent surface induced denaturation of hGH that occurs during aerosolization of an hGH formulation concentrations of non-ionic surfactants in the range 0.1-5% (w/v) are used. FIG. 8A shows the severe aggregation of hGH in a mannitol/phosphate buffer upon aerosolization. Only about 30% of the protein is present as intact monomer. The remainder has formed dimer. trimer and higher order aggregates. The formation of aggregates was eliminated as shown in FIG. 8B which was obtained from a sample after aerosolization of the hGH in a mannitol phosphate buffer, containing 1% polysorbate 80.
Yes always fillers but I meant it more as more pure gh(pharma) should not and never does take 30 mins to fully dissolve. Takes less than 30 seconds.
ive some that took a minute or two for some chunks in the bottom not 30 mins but it wasnt instant all same batch some instant some not different source obviously
Don't know bro, but if I don't swirl it at all and just put back in fridge, it takes at least 15 minutes or so.
Several batches from 2-different sources =same results, give or take a few minutes
ClassyChassisYeah, I don't know what could take that long. All the substances used in HGH preparations dissolve pretty easily.
Yeah man, mine always takes a while too, I'll put bac water in and put them back in the fridge for 30 minutes or so and they are ready to go!
If not it's a lot of swirling very slowly
Ive never had one take longer then 3-4minutes. And been using it for about a year and a half. Not sure about the 30min thing...
Agreed.
Same here
I haven't checked this page in a while, but I just placed an order and had a tracker within an hour after donation, same as the last time I ordered, but it looks like some folks here are having some issues?
I dont get answer to my PM so I ask from community.
How long it takes get order to Europe?
Week, month or months? thanks
SonofaBitchI just wanna say this source has been on point with communication with me. Over a period of a month this guy never failed to respond within a days notice.
@cummin apart. I mean from which country they send
General Tso's
ClassyChassisThat's a big secret that we can't let Customs find out.
My last kits came in the mail today, best news I've had this week. Bad news is that I'm gonna have to buy a bigger freezer. Had to throw most of my wife's ice cream out to make room for these last few kits.
You must have a tiny freezer, and no reason for the gh to be in the freezer anyway
Savage haha
Yeah, but out of the four tubs I kept, one of them was the low calorie kind I bought her. She'll be so greatful I thought about her caloric intake that she'll forgive me for throwing out all the rest. Right?
Or you’re implying that she’s fat and shouldn’t eat the higher calorie ones