posted Sat, 08/24/2013 - 14:59
1726
+ 5 Labs on 8-23-2013
ad
This is my most recent test level. My current cycle is Perf's Test Cyp 250 and EQ 300 E3.5D. The Test Cyp is from the No Homo Promo and the EQ is from right before his last promo. Expiration dates : 1/2014
Ordered from:
- Bookmark
- 5
- 0
Also in case anyone is wondering the Test Cyp is the short vials with the light blue cap and the EQ is the short vials with the red cap. All have the old Synergist logo and label.
The Exp date on the EQ is 1/2015 not 1/2014 as I posted in the description with the pic.
I used some tren e from that promo and thaught it was great. I am currently running cyp, prop and tren e from this last promo. Very interested to see what my bloods come back like, thanks for the labs bro.
AnonFor 500mg of test and 600 of EQ its ok but i would og imagines a lil more
Just my opinion not a fact
You're probably right. I'm a TRT guy and my Test level was at 204 in January of this year so my starting level is low to begin with. I have been saving my script Test for a rainy day.
AnonMy friend is on TRT and he did 300mg TestCyp a week and had his bloods done with results of 1908dg/nL
And i see ur using bout a gram of gear and only a lil less than twice the amount of test levels
Unless EQ isnt read as test in bloods
I've seen guys with 250mg test cyp in the 900's, I've also seen someone with 100mg test cyp at 1300ng so don't believe every single person should have 5000ng from 500mg test it doesnt work that way everyone will have different levels
EQ is NOT test and will not be read as test
Thanks for the info on EQ. Good to know.
AnonTrue man everybody is different everybody is chemically different
Yeah, not sure if EQ would read there either. I was doing TRT of 100mg test once per week and labs came back at just over 600. I really just started AAS this year so I'm learning as I go. Def no expert.
AnonIt also depends person to person since verybody has different amount of SHBG
thanks for the bloods!
Batch numbers on ur gear?
theyre the old labels probably w.o batch numbers
Awesome! Looks like its not as bad as we thought!