default
Sat, 01/23/2016 - 22:57
1635
SARM stack
ad
Default - Use Group's defaults.
I have ran 2 sarm stacks on the past and my last was LGD with 677. I loved the in cycle gains but realized after the fact that a lot was water weight from the LGD. Also, upon reading further I'm noticing that at 10mg daily LGD is more suppressive than most believed. I'm looking to try a new stack to increase lean mass and shed some unwanted stomach fat. I was thinking of trying YK-11 and MK-677 and possibly adding in MK-2866 during my mini pct. any suggestions or past experiences would be greatly appreciated.
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
YK 11 IMHO is more suppressive than LGD. I want use YK 11 off cycle, it's best to use on cycle with a test base. If it were me I'd just stick to a 6 to 8 week ostarine and mk 677 cycle and make some nice lean gains and save the YK 11 for when your on cycle.
Much appreciated! i think ill run both Mks for a 12 week cycle. Any input on RAD140 or the SR9009? All these new sarms are starting to catch my attention. I'm not sure what to run and which suppress the most with all of the varied studies out there
I've ran Rad 140. It's more impressive on paper. I like Ostarine over Rad 140 any day. There are a few guys trying the SR9009 out but haven't heard any feedback yet. The short half life and bioavailability doesn't make it to appealing though.