+ 50 HGH...BORN AGAIN
Alright here we go, I've written this three times over the last couple months and then erased and closed the topic. The problem with the subject I am about to touch on is that people will take me wrong and use what it is I'm referring to in a way not intended. I had a discussion last night with one of the advanced guys, and we have many, and the topic was "outside the box". The reason I say outside the box is that once you have used compounds for a long period of time you begin to do experiments. Someone who impressed me early on with this was roidnoid and I saw many writes of his where he would write cycles that were essentially synergistic, meaning not just one compound to do this and one to do that, but compounds that work with others to actually enhance the original and visabersa.
So heres the deal, many of us have the fear and have had the fear that our discussions if in the open would extend themselves into the "newb" or "common" thought processes . Its tougbh for many of us to have PM's and emails with each other when our ideas would be better talked about in a thread together to be bounced off of each other and discussed and debated. Last night a good friend of mine here said "I know it could not be done but it woluld be nice if we had a locked thread only some of us could enter". I know that sounds weird to many but we simply do not want these ideas becoming the new thing in the mainstream of our community. Many of us have worked very hard for a long time to set all the protocols this board has adopted. Such as test only first run, only add one compound at a time to learn the compounds and learn their effects on each other etc. This is the only way to learn how to manipulate your body without just throwing things at the wall in combination to see if it sticks. Because of that hard work all of our crazy thoughts and crazy ideas have been kept behind the curtains. So anyway, this member and I were talking and he said I have talked to x,y,z and have the votes that say we should be able to talk a little more open without fearing our thoughts will become mainstream, what say you? Well, I agreed. Its this, if you are new to gear you can't go straight to the topand if you do after being advised otherwise, thats on you.
I think what has helped keep me shut with out of the box talk is AEROK. You can imagine being someone who spoke to him daily right up to his death the thoughts of "outside the box" bring him to my mind. I have this in my corner, I advised him "daily" to slow down. Advised him daily, including in the thread we have posted leading to his death, to drop the insulin discussion, not there yet, if ever. All we can do is advise, we can't be their mommy and if we could, molmmies babies die every single day from doing things Mommy taught them not to do. So this sounds deep right? Well, the topics won't be as crazy as I might have you thinking by now, and thats good but they might be outside the manstream. I'll give a prime example before I get to my topic outside the box. 19 nor esters. We preach dual 19's is an absolute no no. It is, thats because newbs ruin themselves with a single 19 use not knowing what they are doing or running without a test base or running them way too long. I talked to a guy who had ran tren ace for nearly a yr at 18 years old and now at 21 he has no natty test! His numbers are that of a 70 yr old man, permanent axis damage, trt for life at 21. So you can see why resposible people bust there ass here to make you right, make you successful in a healthy way etc. It has been known that I got a little frustrated with a few members for running around here like chickens with their heads cut off frustrated and pissed at newbs. Frustrated because I know what they are feeling. Its frustration with new guys about to hurt themselves and unfortunately that sometimes comes out as anger but they were acting on their passion for this and their compassion for new guys they want to help and protect.
Bottom line, we want the new guys and all guys to he safe but its time we can have some open talks about our lives too, those of us who have used for many yrs that is. I actually liked the thread of Nitti's where he went
Designer in discussion and labeled it vets only. That may be what we have to do and then just hope the new generations don't take it on as "the norm" in terms of early use. If you do we advised against it and thats on you.
Alright so to add to the newr gereration of talks outside the box I'll kick it off with what I call "HGH, BORN AGAIN". I USED THAT TITL?E BECAUSE i think my new topic will be something never talked about, never discussed outside of myself and a coupl?e otehers and with anything new, there will be controversy and debate. I have had this convo with guys in PM but have erased the topic 2 times now just wondering, is it time? Well, today it is and like it or love it I'm laying down my thoughts on the new hgh thoughts and some science and opinion all wrapped into one. I'm goling to start with a very bold statement that might even turn off some of the big dogs like Vike, who never felt as though he needed hgh. The one thing I know about people like Vike though, he is open minded. You have to be to he successful and to grow with anything you do or you gtet left behind. Remember, at one point in time they thought if went over about 50 miles an hr in a car or vehicle you would not be able to breath. Glad we pusjed ourslves outside the box because I have to run about 80 to get to work on time given I wait to the last minute to leave!
So lets begin and I hope you are someone who lasted through this much writing, if you didn't , you don't have the patience to be here anyway, or you don't like me in which case, suck it Ed!
HGH has essentially had 3 uses to date.
1. For growth issues for children with pituitary problems, its original use
2. Hrt for anti-aging
3.Bodybuilding to create new muscle growth not attainable with oils and orals alone
Today I hope to add a 4th to the list and again, it will be met with some outcry opposing it as all things do.
L?et me re-explain in boring fashion something I have touched on many many times here without goiing to this length previously. What happens in the body when a hormone is put in with a syringe or orally etc? There is an action that occurs right? So what did we learn in school about action? Every action has a reaction right? Exactly...so lets talk about action/reaction. The action was simply the addition of hormone. Now we talk about the complex matter of what the the body does with that action and not get too too scientific. In order for the body to create all the necessary balances there are regulations that are coodinated with the brain and glands to create balance and work towrads homeostasis. Such as if the thyroid puts out T-4, tha is a reaction. The brain reads the action that has occured and assesses the need ,if any. So if T-r level is higher than the brain deeks normal it sends another reaction to lower TSH. TSH is present for pos/neg feedback loop. So as it lowers in number that action is called negative feedback. The feedback the thyroid loop recieves is stop producing T-4, it is too high. Then the thyroid comes back into balance.
So now lets ask, what happens when you inject testosterone? That is an acion right? So what responce in negative and positive feedback loop occurs? Think of the axis (hpta), what is an axis used for? Balance right? So if the axis is there for the soul purpose and I just threw a shovel full of test on one side and that scale drops hard on that side what is the bodies primary job in homrone? Balance! So what then occurs is there is a feedback as dicussed above. The feedback is simply "holy shit, look at all this test!!!" That tel the HP to say "holy shit, look at all that test!!!!" It then fired up the glands and calls in all the part timers and has to fully staff to bring enough natty gh to make that balanc happen. Make no mistake there will be balance one way or the other or you have problems! Such as what happens if you have high thyroid or low insulin etc? You are unhealthy right? So in this case there is no difference, without that balance what you are doing is not the healthiest thing in the woldm so what did occur back there is that the hp gave it its all, it busted it ass for you brother and when the day ended they found while they did increase natty gh there was simply too much test to make tye full balance. So was the excess test wasted then is the question? Yes, to some degree. The body will utilize some of that exceess but it is or was not in the most efficient way, the use was minimalized and the most important thought there was IT WAS NOT THE HEALTHIEST WAY TO RUN YOUR CYCLE IMO!!!. NORMONE OUT OF BALANCE IS UNHEALTHY RIGHT, WE AT LEAST AGREE THERE CORRECT?
Sol now we begin to get to the heart of mmy thoughts. The "new" use for hgh in the cycle and pct run only. Ahhhh but Tread, you of all people know you can't just use hgh in the cycle, you said yourself, hgh has to be ran 6 months minumum to get thegh effect from it. Weeeeelllllllllllll, that is true actually but thankfully I have an open mind and love learning about this that we do. What I said is true in that "if you are looking to stack on a bunch of extra muscle with hgh real?ly you do need 2 or 3 cycles deppending on short or long in a yr with hgh blast and cruise within that yr. Thats not what I'm talking about though, in fact, I want to get off that topic enirely here today to discuss our health and more productive cycles as well as better hormone balanc in the cycle which are the reason for the first 2 things I mention iin tbis sentence, run on sentence as it were. For today lets discuss what I deem to be its "new" use. Cycle and pct only and I'll tell you why right now.
We just dicusse what occurs in the axis when you run oil and the fact your axis and hormone base is essentjally out of balance your entire cycle andwe have to agree while the cycle if proper to goal and not abused can be healthy in the ?ong run. why not talk about why the cycle itself might need to be healthier and not just the long term effect? Why not balance this cycle with hgh in low dose, not looking for the gh effect but rather looking for the balanc in hormone effect and a morre productive cycle all around?
Her is my theory and I want the debates, I want the arguments because I wnt to be right for the right reasons. I believe test at 500 with 2 iu's of hgh (good hgh) ed will yiled a more productive and MUCH HEALTHIER cycle than 2 comounds rran higher in mg's. Reason,you are actually in balance and the body is a much more effective machine in balance than when its out of balance. The furnace has time to kick on more efficiently than in the mass flucuatiion cycle you ran before hgh.such as AC cracked on high on a 100 degree day but all the windows are open. The house will be more efficiently maintained if you close the windows and closing those windows is what hgh represents here.
Yes , I get it, "we've always said hgh is a down the road thought Tread". Very true and for the purposes of gh effect and myscle building etc I'm still of that mindset. Think of this as being a topic I proposed before, "test and estroge". Many many people began running an AI in cycle for uses outside gyno once that was posted and if you look to the cycle threads all writes mostly now include an AI protocol in cycle. Some said well I have good luck without it. My reply was "so you are telling me having better luck is off the tablel? Open your mind is all I am saying. If nascar had said "we have good luck" with the tin cans of the 70's and stopped evolving we we would not have the era we have by which there are an elite few deaths in mgea crashes today. Evoltion will occure whether you go with it or not. This is contreversial and I'm greatful for that. It should he, Tread should not be the final word on jackshit, ever! This is my opinion and put it in one hand and shit in the other and see which one flls quicker. Let me close prior to including the pct benefit by saying. I think this to be maybe 3rd cycle advice, I still beieve its still add one compound at a time test only to start and this is low dose for balance purposes only NOT 5IU'S!!!!!!!!!!!
ALRIGHT NO THE PCT BENEFIT......
What are we doing in pct? Trying to reboot natty test right? How are we doing that? Well, we are trying to use nolva for one to influence or create a "positive feedback" to refire LH. This will then signal and refire nattyy test. Another way that is occurring is though positive feedback loop in the axis becaus the body is still producing natty gh, that never shut down.. so what happens by continuing our 2 iu's ed of hgh in the pct run? We basically double that positive feedback responce to fire natty test. IMO that not onoly conitnues a healtheir cycle and potentially fires you up quciker, it fires you up stronge given the mor gh in the body the more the axis asks for test and the more it asks for. Seems like a no brainer which is another reason I've often even thought of recommending gh just as a pct addition, still I believe the full ride is where the true health is. Realize, this in my mind is a health topic and has little to do with growth of additional muscle, I simply think we have healthier cycles and recovery and I think of this the way I do the an AI , anotuer way to create health and bnefit in the cycle. I will ammend something shortluy, I don't mean to think or have anyone think above that I came up with an AI protocol in cycle, many of us have used hta a long time I just think we have talked about it so much lately it is becoming part of the newer guys cycles as well and happen to think thats agreat thing. I love the fact we can all discuss these things and together turn something into actual protocol for the sake of everyone. Lets debate it, look forward to all reples and all science and opinion because I'm her tol learn just like the 25 yr old that walked in the door this morning wanting his first roll. Its still fun to me, thats the only reason I'm here.
- Bookmark
- 50
- 0
StevebGood read
Very awesome write up. Thanks for your time.
Great read:-)
well I have read through this thread a few times. I have loved what I have learned. There were many questions initially, still a few. ANd I suppose that I'm left with a real fucking noob question, and I dare sound like I'm an idiot.
But what is "good HGH" exactly? and this isn't some metaphysical Psyche question. with so many damned Yellows, blues, Reds, Kigs Rips Nors. Expensive shit. Cheap shit. Chinese shit ETC. preorder this, and blood test that.
I still feel like it's a random gamble If I buy some HGH.
I have lost a lot of respect for myself since I started to use AAS for the second time in my life. Mostly because I dont know shit. I learn shit now, but I still dont know shit.
I dont expect to understand a rapidly expanding and changing dynamic underground business in a few weeks.
I just wanted to voice my basic fucktard brain image of what I know. And I dont even know what "good hgh" is. Even after reading about it for close to ten hours total.
Anonwell, that is def ONE way to put it! lol
AnonAND THE PROOF IS IN THE PUDDING!
http://www.eroids.com/pics/blood-work.need-help.from-vets.-something-isn....
This guy right here has been off his cycle for 4 months and has been running some peptides to induce natty gh as well as riptropin. check out THOSE test, FSH, & LH numbers, fellas! That's increased positive feedback hands down!
AnonUnfortunately because of my personal needs, I have run two compounds from 4 weeks in to my cycle and still now on cruise. On and off for much of it I have also run 3-4 ius of HGH 4-5 days a week.
Now I only figured Id get away with this NOR19 compound for so long because I am 43 and have resolved my self to the fact that I will be supplimenting test for the rest of my life.
Now where I question my self a little is the fact that I run the deca to help arthritus, and by god it does work, but then theres the known side affect of joint pain as HGH dose goes up. So although HGH is great for muscle, skin, fat loss etc, am I doing my joints any favor by adding it in to the recipe ?
What is the synergy of a compound know to alleviate joint aches, and one that is known to cause them ?
tread-mI would drop your hrt hgh dose down to 2 iu's ed. Thats a good anti-aging dose with good gh and can help in rebuilding or at least slowing joint depreciation. Deca is masking the issue so no real help aside of the mask itself which is fine.
Anonok Thanks !!! I'll try 2ius, plus it will last a lot longer !
At this point Im fine with masking the issue, Im just happy to have a reprieve.
Give them a vote if you find it helpful.PermalinkAs we've come to expect from our resident guru, another great article. I've read through this several times now and as you know under your guidance have embarked on gh program recently. Very informative and particularly helpful to those not as familiar with gh.
Very helpful - appreciate the work you put into this post, tread-m; and thanks to gorillafit for pointing me to this article.
this is golden advice my friend.. great read, a lot of good info in here.. as always, our resident guru strikes again..
Read entirely ...noted..seems like great advice
Read the whole thing.... made alot of sense especially on the hormone balancing.
Once again Tread another incredible informative post. You hear it all the time but again this is a huge help to my research. Big thanks!
Outstanding read. I would assume that's what you would produce here for us, but none the less outstanding.
First off I do think all topics should and could be discussed in an open and honest forum. On the same hand I think that if the experts here would agree to have a locked forum I would support that as well.
There are many forums on the internet, even more supplier's but no community I have found with the profound knowledge and caring Like I have found here on eroids.
I may be a shower shoe, not even a BOOT yet in my tour into this realm of the world. I agree whole hardhearted that low doses are the way to go. and there are always exception's but I find my body very receptive to small doses, and big knowledge.
Thanks, and best luck on your journey
Good read mate. Ok I have a question. If we use GH during cycle and then use it as part of PCT to kick start natty test (which by the way is very clever) at what stage do we start to recover from excessive amounts of GH and Ptirity gland secretion deminishies. in my eyes after reading this and it does make sense mate. I would possibly consider as part of my PCT using GHRP to stimulate the natural secretion of GH to higher levels. This could maybe be done after the PCT has been run using GH to assist the Natty test production. Like you mate I am here to continue to learn and keep an open mind. I also want to discuss GH protocols as well in another thread but will leave that for another day. Let me know your thoughts mate. Cheers
tread-mAs to the excessive amounts of gh and return to norm. That is the nice thing about stopping gh, it never shuts down on the natty side with gh use the way test does on the test side of the axis so it is literally immediately as to "normal". With it not shutting down the balance effect in the axis prompts what it needs from the natty test side through positive feedback and visaversa so there is literally zero interuption on the gh side. The only interuption at all is from males hitting hgh too close too bed which can create negative feedback for that night as the axis recognizes "plenty" in the system.
Ah rightyO. Also then on that note it would also be better to administer your GH then in the AM as opposed to the PM. That way you wont be missing out on your natural GH secretion over night? Just a thought big guy
tread-mTHAT HAS BEEN MY THOUGHT AND USE WALL, I don't even mind those that split but I suggest second round at least 4 hrs pre-sleep.
Anonhell of a read, brotha! i was doing some reading of my own elsewhere about the benefits, if any, of low doses and short-term uses of HGH particularly during PCT. Came across a study that was conducted where the test subjects were given low doses of it while under an induced state of hypogonadism. The results: zero reduction of lean body mass. Then cdaddy pointed me to this post. +1
tread-mThank you sir!
hey tread you opened my eyes and grounded my ass with this,im not talking about the hgh use part of it.but as a newb myself its real easy to look around and see what people use and think..ya im gonna do that.but you talking about your friend that pasted,made me realize,keep shit simple or you get in over your head.i had posted what i wanted to tr for a second cycle and was quickly responded to and i was told to slow down.this thread you wrote clears up why you guys care so much.i thank you all for that,and im sure my health does too.
tread-mI'm glad you could benefit from it.
I think this makes sense. Will try it for sure. Thanks a lot for posting this. May I repost this?
tread-mYou may but you may want to wait until I have had time to clean it up..spelling etc. Will do so in the next couple days as I get time. Thank you
CleyonThank you for taking the time to write this multiple times. I think that working with our bodies natural strengths and weaknesses, and using compounds in a synergistic manner is a great idea.
tread-mMy pleasure c.
Great post!! +1! I have to agree 100% on balance and consistancy in maintaining homostasis is one of the biggest factors to getting results from your cycles...Good job brother.
tread-mThanks Shrap!
Nice bro... love the thread. when is ur 1st book coming out? you can and should write one luv u bro. homo, I mean no home can I pitch a tent in ur yard and you can teach me the ways oh wise one... in all seriousness you have taught me so much i never get tired of your posts. Thanks tread
tread-mThanks E! Much appreciated, its fun for me and love sharing what I can.
You should change your handle to Yoda! Lol.
tread-mLooool
cdaddy7Master T, you an I met in a thread on this very discussion on Hgh and my own misconceptions..getting older myself i am looking at ways to improve my overall health always..there is true benefits to Hgh but as u said we must approach with reasoning and find the therapeutic dose that can optimize its full potential..I have very little experience with the compound but the benefits rank right there with test and even more..just the regeneration properties with joints, lig, cartilage, tendons is enough to seal the deal in my book, but then u have the loss of adipose tissue and retainment and gains of muscle mass or how about the gh sleep that everyone talks about when on gh therapy...how appealing..mixing it with a moderate dose of Test @ 500mg/week sweetens the deal bc now u have optimal levels of Test with the Hgh creates synergy that produces a complete anabolic environment to grow and recover..and running it PCT makes all the sense in the world outside the natty test benefits, let's look at how Hgh improves mood therefore reducing the dreaded PCT.....the more studies that come out related to Hgh and the many benefits of its therapy definitely make it to be tbe acclaimed fountain of youth...great post Master Tread, full of wisdom and understanding as always
tread-mVery well put!!! I just have to get these old dogs to figure this "synergy" as you put it so nicely. Hell Vike still mows his yard by whittling a big stick sharp and whackin that shit down. I'm goling to ship him a lawnmower and a kit of hgh and see if I can get him to come on over to the brighter side!!! I'd call him now but he's probably busy whckin flint together to build their morning fire!!! Lmaaaaooooo, he'll shit when he see's this, hell we're brothers he'll live. Nice stuff always C, yyou're a guy I can learn from through discussion, we're the pioneers brother, we don't do it then who?
cdaddy7Most agreed T, I def believe we are onto something greater than we imagined...after our discussion I went to the books and began to research and the more I find points in one direction , and that is positive....I think the misconceptions fall into the categories of abuse rather than use....it is well said with this as is with testosterone or anything else too much of a good thing can become bad, but the doses and use we are discussing is within reason to produce the described benefits...most fear what they don't understand but that is bc of lack of knowledge not bc of some atrocities related directly to use of gh properly...Sly stallone is another one to consider, he is 66 and in Damn good shape when you compare him to the great Arnold which is a year younger and does not have the musculature of sly....now I'm taking into consideration the abuse factor of Arnold and AAS, but sly himself had some AAS experience but found his way to gh and we know this for sure bc he was busted a few years back for it....we know that he must have not been using ungodly amounts bc he has no acromeglia present....and we cannot avoid the fact that he looks years younger than Arnold and his physique is that of a middle aged man....that speaks for itself....ok I could go on forever but my point is I am considering Hgh therapy for myself with human grade, I spoke earlier this am to Nitti about it...I am convinced with my research and what I know from my short past experience with the hormone that running it to its full potential will behoove me....I plan to do just that and run a log to show my success and progress or failure which I perceive to be none
tread-mThe words all fall in line with my own use and experience/research. The beauty of use other than the obvious benefits will be that you begin to understand gh and also kill all of the hog wash you read about it. Again, most of the propoganda is planted by products thatg would compete with gh. None bigger than the BS put out by many of the companies making the oral "hgh" products. You quickly realize as well the wonderful aspects of even early use that are spken of by ftcpl below. Dead on as always C, thanks for all your input!
I ll jump in on this one.. I told someone earlier today that without discussion there is no advancement of learning .. I m so glad you came out of the closet
tread-mYes and I know who you told that to and agree. I'm glad to see the heavy hitters dicuss this and encourage it, thank you grrrl ! I am not right as I told many others but unless we can talk about anything outside the script we get lost in the past and I'm not about looking backwards tol my good ole days, I'm about some more good ole days and IMO these are the sorts of things that encourage that.
First off I'm glad you made a final draft brother! I've been waiting for this one! I for one have never run HGH at all ever! It is something that I have been studying and been taking into serious consideration. I have a few concerns with this theory or possible new school of thought. For me personally (you and I have discussed this in private) its the possibility of accelerated growth of cancer cells while using growth hormone. I've had a few issues in the recent last and this is a concern for me. People have given me their opinion on that (including tread) but I can never find a clear definitive yes or no! There aren't man studies (that I can find) and while I trust te words of some of the guys around here 100% ,this is simply something I need to be more clear on. Secondly, you touched on the axis and explained it so that a 4 year old would understand. Shovel full of test on one end and Ohh fuck, the body beds to produce more GH to create a balance. My question is, by using GH even at 2iu/day, what else are you throwing out of balance? We all know how the axis works (we all should) but there are smaller branches of that axis correct? T3, T4, insulin, etc. So what else is thrown out of balance? Is it dangerous? Do I now need to supplement t3 or t4? Is the dose of 2iu so low that it will only be beneficial and not interrupt this balance? What about if I decide "you know I'm doing pretty good with 2iu but I want to go harder. I should take full advantage of this while it lasts. I'll bump it to 5iu a day"! Is this going to be a concern as well? I have more questions fellas but I will save them for a little later!
As for the pct, I am in total agreement and it makes perfect sense, assuming that my above questions are answered to my comfort level. Great post and thank you for this! I am in the group who think outside the box. I don't run your prototypical cycle and I know what works and doesn't work for me (for the most part) when it comes to AAS.
Bring it bitches! Fire away
tread-mMy brother, I can't answer the cancer question in full which is the molst concerning question or concern you bring. Let me tell you what I do know about it although not conclusive. As I researched gh my concerns were yours above and cancer running in my family to some degree it concerned me deeply. I went to work, I am that guy that when I want something I seek and destroy. Seek info and destroy myth. The myth part is about 90+% of everything you read on hgh. Why? Because much of the so called "studies" were paid for and protocoled by would be competitors of hgh with "like" products. So some of the would be competitiors actually fund studies in protocol?s they know will fail and then put out the negative results without informing you that the protocols they used were designed for failure. Thats not science its agenda and then propoganda. Such as if I were to have a product I wanted to compete with ibuprofin. I could fund or create a study by where I gave rate 10 times the recommended daily dose of ibuprofin until a percentage of the rats had liver failure and then legally blow up articles all over the net and anywhere else that would have them saying ibuprofin is causing liver failure. Its true, it dxixd c,ause it, just not an honest truth because I did not reveal the protocol in which thatv failure took place.
So this was the case with hgh, I was able to follow a few of the money trails as it were right back to people with agenda. As to one of the real studies I did find and I'd love to be able to relocate that for you if possible, it showed no significant difference in tumor growth. There was a slight increase but within a margin of error meaning it was obvious of 2 groups there would be a fraction of a percent difference and that was the case. Same with enhancing the chance of new cancer only that one found the margin of error swayed slightly the other way. So mega change or overwhelming proof, not even close. One could say "if hgh causes cell growth and timors are cells how could it be possible the tumors would not grow. Two reasons come to my mind. one, the good studies are done with reasonable protocols such as the one I have lined out above for balance. This means the intent of that use was not to cause mass cell growth to begin with such as a Cutler stack with 10 plus iu's ed. The other is, maybe the good cell production if there were to be such a thing, produced enough fighters against the cancer cells that in the end even if there was tumor influence it was a wash in net gain tjumor cells. Understand, this is all just my guess based on the end results of a few legit studies I found and also understand, if there is a 99.999% chance there is no growth and you fall in to that .001 category, its still 100% for you...see what I mean?
I will talk to you in private on the higher use, as to this thread I want to stay on tkpic as it pertains to "balance" so we don't blurr the ?ines. This is a topic I don't even want to consider "hgh use" in the traditional sense because I want the focus to be simple axis balance and no gh affect as it goes.
Now to what might be the most valuable concern you ask about outside of the obvious concern of cancer. Does hgh even in the low dose have a change impact on all other hormone. P below and I have discussed this some and the simple answer is yes. Now while you can debate that being good , bad or no consequence I lean to good/no consequence. For the purpose of this particular thread and the low dose balance, the change is quite insignificant. In fact, at this dose or lower there has shown to be no thyroid suppression at all so I never recommend T-4 use at 2 or below. Keep in mind, with the low dose 2 iu's ed the small changes IMO are easily handled with pos/neg feedback loop through the body and the only real bloodwork change one can expect is higher test and igf-1 levels which in fact is the point of "balance" altogether. Using higher than 2 iu's ed then we need tol step outside thi topic and discuss many things though. You always bring great conversation nitti, as to our convo last night this may just be one of the first.
Fair enough brother! I'm kind of submersed in this entire topic of HGH right now so when I saw the post my mind wandered. But I'll stay the course here! The rest I'll talk to you about later. That being said, I have a very basic understanding of this topic. I understand the axis and the basic principals of its function so this theory of yours sounds 100% legit to me! I am someone without bias on this. I have never used it but am totally open minded to anything logical! This I like! When I finally get to the point when I'm pinning my first dose of GH, I will be following your protocol here and I'll be my own test subject to this theory. Il document everything and use my lab connection to get weekly bloods. Shit I'll even record it for evidence.
Ohh and you answered my one question that did relate to the topic. The suppression of other branch hormones and those branches being thrown out of whack! So the answer is 2iu will NOT disturb this balance correct?
tread-mYes and I encourage the bloods and the documentation thats all awsome but I will say this, if you run a cycle that you know well and know your effects on it etc and you do so with 2 iu's ed, that balance I speak of will be so obvious the bloods will si.mlly be there to confirm what you already know. Let me add, "you have to have good gh or its just a guess" and fromm there you not only don't know more thn before, you may know less! Lol. Use gh you know for a fact is good and aside of pharma I can recommend a couple when ready. One in particular I love and most of that has been the consistancy in a powder market that went to hell 10 months ago! These however have been golden and until they become something else I'm stuck right where I am. As to the 2 iu ed and balance of everything else, your bloods will be just as good as without it. Maybe you have a 1/1000th of 1 percent change but in the grand scheme of what the body knows as "range of norm" it is without significance.
Well after being on eroids close to a year, I know to go for human grade no matter the cost. But I trust your judgment. We'll talk about that.
tread-mAnytime day/night brother, you have my email where I live! Lool
Still not for uncle vike my brother... but that dont mean i dont love you anymore lol... i may give it a whirl when i get old!... until then its "ROIDS only for this young fella... stallones face looks lika crushed arse... fuck that!
AnonYeah but how much of stalones face looks fucked up from hgh, how much from plastic surgery ? Arnold looks so fucking bizzare now too ,and both of them went under the knife together, saw a pic all cutesie like of the two of them in hospital beds after being mutilated.
tread-mIf you think his face is Fed up now you should see what it would look like without hgh use. Hgh regenerates skin cells and collogen, not depreciate them. I never claimed hgh makes you pretty, genes do that.
Anonwell unfortunately you could dip sly in a bottle of hgh and its not going to fix what a surgeon did.
Seriously how many faces have you seen that actually look better after the knife.
Id take HGH any day before letting those butchers make me look like a clown.