posted Mon, 10/17/2016 - 15:58
1577
Peptide results vs Natural Anabolics
ad
I know that peptides really shine the longer you use them like HGH, but I was wondering how an 8 week span of peptides (no specific compounds or dosing) would compare to some of the natural anabolics.
Say I was wanting to do an 8 week recomp, what would yield better results out of the two:
Mod grf and GHRP 2 3x a day at 100mcg/150mcg
vs
Arachidonic Acid (SNS X Gels) and PES Anabeta Elite
I'm not sure how common these products are here, I just see them posted about on a few other forums so I'm looking for people who have ran both peptides and natural anabolics and can compare them. They don't have to be specific to the ones mentioned above, I would just like feedback on your guys' experiences.
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
I don't think you would see much, if any results from either. It sounds like you may have too high of hopes here.
Unless you know your body exceptionally well and know nutrition very well, a recomp will most likely leave you disappointed.
What is your body fat at?
I wouldn't expect much from those either, except a little lighter wallet.
Peptides were pretty much free for helping someone out, so not a total loss. Experimenting money while I stay off AAS lol
If looking to take something other than AAS, stick with tried and true creatine. That is money well spent.
I'm post surgery so I'm mainly hoping for help with increased GH output. I was thinking since I've been out a while that I could get some muscle memory from getting back to it with a good diet and maybe a little it if help from the peptides to help keep fat off.
Bf is probably around 12-15, I'm bad at guessing that. I know peptides won't provide much, I've ran previous cycles before and know nothing really compares to test, Tren, and those things I have ran.
Why not run hgh then and get the real results
Price difference is the only reason to be honest.