"real reviews"
First thing....
When someone asks questions like "who has the best" the answer should of course be "look at the top voted sources" or in the case of ug labs, the polls are very helpful.
But often times you see shipping reviews rather than products. Does anyone else notice the positive actual product reviews are from low rep profiles that never post anywhere else? Sounds like source profiles to me.
Anyway
I see no problem with "who has best deca" questions, or similar specific compound questions. Top voted doesn't always mean its products that get the vote. Also, just because someones testosterone is great, that doesn't mean their deca/orals are great.To all the newbies, post a poll, post a product to be reviewed. I myself am gonna post a peptide poll. I order from "top" voted peptide source yet hardly see their peptides being reviewed. Its very frustrating, id like to know specific opinions. Example: Ghrp6, who carries the best quality? Specific questions as these get specific answers. You're told "do your work" yet the answers are questionable or false.
Any ideas how we can change things?
- Bookmark
- 0
- 0
Even then, unless the gear is legitimate Human Grade stuff, its still all a gamble. I could purchase some gear from a UGL, then send off a sample of it to a lab, and find out what's really under that flip-top. BUT even then... that only applies to just that vial.
So if that sample came back great, and I posted about it, I'm sure a lot of people would feel confident about buying that stuff. But there's still the chance of that lab cooking up a bad batch.
So in the end, if you're dabbling in the UG world, you're gambling.