+ 2 Something else to look out for when choosing a source.
Vote...........Voter...........Date Voted............. Last access
100%.........Comic00Man...... 2011-12-28 14:45........2012-02-08 17:03
100%.........roid1489........ 2011-12-26 02:53........2011-12-26 02:56
75%..........mattiteppo...... 2011-11-28 14:05 .......2012-01-26 12:03
100%.........drewwcifer...... 2011-10-14 17:22........2011-11-03 21:15
100%.........newbroid1987.... 2011-10-10 13:19........2011-10-11 21:35
100%.........RealSoldier..... 2011-09-29 12:50........2011-09-29 12:50
100%.........Kevin2117....... 2011-09-25 05:54........2011-09-25 05:54
100%.........Shermann........ 2011-09-19 16:07........2011-09-19 16:08
100%.........Getharder....... 2011-09-09 16:15........2011-11-01 14:44
100%.........MasterJohn...... 2011-09-03 19:08........2011-09-03 19:08
100%.........dumblejack...... 2011-08-06 16:23........2011-08-06 16:23
100%.........jamesuk......... 2011-08-04 07:24........2011-08-04 07:34
100%.........Gilbeyjack...... 2011-07-27 01:42 .......2011-08-04 08:03
Everybody see the pattern??
- Bookmark
- 2
- 0
Actually, not a bad observation, KMC. Kudos. Lemme vote and then the hell with this eroids! I'm NEVER coming back on again after I leave my 100% review.
If they are honest 100% vote I wouldn't be as concerned..............:-0.
But if you look at their join date (Not shown), their vote date, and their last access date it would make one think they only came here to artifically vote up/ down a given source for unknown purposes.
ETA: But really,.........how much faith do you have in an internet user name that was here for 5 minutes. Think about, 5 minutes, in 5 minutes, they registered, made their way to that one sources review page, voted 100% for that source and disappeared ........all in 5 minutes, they are either really good at this internet thing, or have been here many times before.
The JOIN date IS a critical piece of info here! And you did the extra lookup via the username to complete the picture. Nice.
YES FOR SURE . . . if you joined, posted a 100% review, then your last post was 5 minutes later, that's a faker who's upvoting the rep. And most folks (self included) WOULD miss that on first inspection.
Good work, detective!
I'm working on my Eroids Private Investigator/Ogre badge..........LOL.
Your brain works as intended!
Also I believe it was originally your idea to display it like that, some months ago?
Guilty ,................sigh............as I recall you got it done in record time.
ETA: For every one else, the above info can be found under the "Who Voted" tab at the top of the source's review page
This is similar to the thing I said before about people claiming first cycles repeatedly across different sources.
AnonGot it.
Makes me all the more grateful for my SRC and not having to sift through and read through all the BS.
I don't need a new source either,...I've got a good one and tend to kick a few asses when someone screws up and tries to trash them.
Just trying to let all the noobs in on one more thing to watch out for.
Mods,
If I need to edit out user names let me know.