What happened within the world they lived in is, in my view, their own business, but that does not give anyone the right to come in, destroy a culture, a population, traditions, and impose their own rules. It’s a simple example, but as relevant as it gets: when you’re sorting things out with your girlfriend in your own home, and neighbors from the next house come in and start teaching you how to live. Such a turn of events is unacceptable for a free person. In the same way, occupations and colonization aimed at conquest and destruction are unacceptable. But unfortunately, the world is set up in such a way that we accept the rules of this dirty game.

Listen, you’re lumping way too many things together right now. There are real problems - poverty, crime, reservations, historical trauma - no one is arguing with that. But when you start saying “they’re all like that,” “they hate,” “they were bred out,” that’s no longer about facts, that’s about emotions and generalizations.
Native identity isn’t about skin color or about whether someone “looks Indian or not.” It’s about culture, community, family history, and the legal status of a tribe. So yes, someone can look white or Black and still be Native - there’s no contradiction there.
As for crime - it exists not because someone is “Indian” or “not Indian,” but because for decades reservations were isolated, poor, and abandoned by the state. In those conditions, crime appears in any group, whether white, Black, or anyone else.

And hatred toward white people isn’t universal either. There are people with hardline views, and there are plenty of perfectly normal people who just live their lives and don’t hate anyone.

Bottom line, reality is much more complicated than racial labels.